Suppr超能文献

“复方药丸”的疗效和耐受性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

The efficacy and tolerability of 'polypills': meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052145. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the blood pressure and lipid-lowering efficacy and tolerability of 'polypills' used in cardiovascular disease prevention trials.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and PubMed databases were searched for eligible trials. Study inclusion criteria: Randomised controlled trials of at least six weeks duration, which compared a 'polypill' (that included at least one anti-hypertensive and one lipid-lowering medication) with a placebo (or one active component).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and total and LDL-cholesterol; discontinuation of study medication and reported adverse effects. Of 44 potentially eligible studies, six trials (including 2,218 patients without previous cardiovascular disease) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, 'polypills' reduced systolic blood pressure by -9.2 mmHg (95% confidence interval (CI): -13.4, -5.0) diastolic blood pressure by -5.0 mmHg (95%CI: -7.4, -2.6), total cholesterol by -1.22 mmol/L (95%CI: -1.60, -0.84) and LDL-cholesterol by -1.02 mmol/L (95%CI: -1.37, -0.67). However, those taking a 'polypill' (vs. placebo or component) were more likely to discontinue medication (20% vs 14%) (Odds ratio: 1.5 (95% CI: 1.2, 1.9)). There was no significant difference in reported adverse effects amongst those on a 'polypill' (36% vs. 28%) (OR: 1.3 (95%CI: 0.7, 2.5)). There was high statistical heterogeneity in comparisons for blood pressure and lipid-lowering but use of random-effects and quality-effects models produced very similar results.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Compared with placebo, the 'polypills' reduced blood pressure and lipids. Tolerability was lower amongst those on 'polypills' than those on placebo or one component, but differences were moderate. Effectiveness trials are needed to help clarify the status of 'polypills' in primary care and prevention strategies.

摘要

背景

评估心血管疾病预防试验中使用的“复方药丸”的降压和降脂疗效及耐受性。

方法/主要发现:系统评价和荟萃分析。

检索策略

对 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、Medline 和 PubMed 数据库进行检索,以查找合格的试验。研究纳入标准:至少持续六周的随机对照试验,比较“复方药丸”(至少包含一种抗高血压药和一种降脂药)与安慰剂(或一种活性成分)。

结局指标

收缩压和舒张压、总胆固醇和 LDL 胆固醇从基线的变化;研究药物的停药和报告的不良反应。在 44 项潜在合格的研究中,有 6 项试验(包括 2218 名无既往心血管疾病的患者)符合纳入标准。与安慰剂相比,“复方药丸”降低了收缩压-9.2mmHg(95%置信区间[CI]:-13.4,-5.0),舒张压-5.0mmHg(95%CI:-7.4,-2.6),总胆固醇-1.22mmol/L(95%CI:-1.60,-0.84)和 LDL 胆固醇-1.02mmol/L(95%CI:-1.37,-0.67)。然而,服用“复方药丸”的患者(与安慰剂或单一成分相比)更有可能停药(20%比 14%)(比值比:1.5[95%CI:1.2,1.9])。服用“复方药丸”的患者报告的不良反应没有显著差异(36%比 28%)(比值比:1.3[95%CI:0.7,2.5])。在血压和降脂方面的比较存在很高的统计学异质性,但使用随机效应和质量效应模型产生了非常相似的结果。

结论/意义:与安慰剂相比,“复方药丸”降低了血压和血脂。服用“复方药丸”的患者的耐受性低于服用安慰剂或单一成分的患者,但差异较小。需要有效性试验来帮助阐明“复方药丸”在初级保健和预防策略中的地位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4315/3526586/f0a59ef5612d/pone.0052145.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验