Tyczkowska-Sieroń Ewa, Bartoszko-Tyczkowska Anna
Zakład Biologii Srodowiskowej, Katedra Nauk Podstawowych i Przedklinicznych, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Łodzi.
Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 2012;64(3):245-53.
In 2011, the Polish Ministry of Health introduced Candida sp. resistant to fluconazole and Aspergillus sp. to the list of Alarm Factors as alert pathogens. The purpose of this paper is to confirm the validity of continuous monitoring of fungal infections caused by the pathogens mentioned above. The role offluconazole therapy in the Candida sp. infections is also discussed. The analysis of the fungal infections is performed based on the results obtained in the University Clinic Hospital (UCH) No. 1 in Lodz in 2009-2011.
The swabs were plated on Sabouraud's agar. Body fluids and blood were incubated in an automated system Bactec 9050. Yeast ID Phoenix BD panels were used to determine the species of fungi. In turn, antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out by E-tests (bioMerieux).
In the analysis of fungal infections occurring among patients in the UCH No. 1 in Lodz in 2009-2011, C. albicans, C. non-albicans and Aspergillus sp. infections are taken into account. This analysis is performed based on relations of the number of infections (per 100 patients) versus six-month periods. As one can see in Fig. 1, a clear, linear and statistically significant increase in the number of C. albicans and C. non-albicans infections is observed throughout the entire time period under discussion. On the other hand, the number of Aspergillus sp. infections remains at an almost constant low level. The more detailed analysis of fungal infections in the different hospital units, which are particularly exposed to this type of infections (Figs. 2-6), shows that there is a clear correlation between the number of C. non-albicans infections and the frequency of therapy with fluconazole.
The results presented in this paper show in the example of the UCH No. 1 in Lodz that the number of infections caused by C. albicans and C. non-albicans resistant to fluconazole is clearly increasing in a hospital environment in recent years, which is a great clinical problem. Although the number of Aspergillus sp. infections is relatively much lower in comparison to that of Candidia sp., these infections also constitute a problem of clinical importance. In light of the presented analysis, it should be assessed positively the fact that Candida sp. resistant to fluconazole and Aspergillus sp. are considered to be alert pathogens that require the continuous monitoring.
2011年,波兰卫生部将对氟康唑耐药的念珠菌属和曲霉属列入警示因素清单,作为警示病原体。本文旨在证实对上述病原体引起的真菌感染进行持续监测的有效性。还讨论了氟康唑治疗在念珠菌属感染中的作用。基于2009 - 2011年在罗兹第一大学临床医院(UCH)获得的结果对真菌感染进行分析。
将拭子接种在沙保弱琼脂上。体液和血液在Bactec 9050自动系统中培养。使用酵母ID Phoenix BD鉴定板来确定真菌种类。依次通过E-test(生物梅里埃公司)进行药敏试验。
在对2009 - 2011年罗兹第一大学临床医院患者中发生的真菌感染进行分析时,考虑了白色念珠菌、非白色念珠菌和曲霉属感染。该分析基于感染数量(每100名患者)与六个月时间段的关系进行。如图1所示,在整个讨论时间段内,观察到白色念珠菌和非白色念珠菌感染数量呈明显、线性且具有统计学意义 的增加。另一方面,曲霉属感染数量几乎保持在较低的恒定水平。对不同医院科室中特别容易发生此类感染的真菌感染进行更详细分析(图2 - 6)表明,非白色念珠菌感染数量与氟康唑治疗频率之间存在明显相关性。
本文以罗兹第一大学临床医院为例呈现的结果表明,近年来在医院环境中,对氟康唑耐药的白色念珠菌和非白色念珠菌引起的感染数量明显增加,这是一个重大的临床问题。尽管曲霉属感染数量与念珠菌属相比相对低得多,但这些感染也构成具有临床重要性的问题。根据所呈现的分析,应积极评估将对氟康唑耐药的念珠菌属和曲霉属视为需要持续监测的警示病原体这一事实。