• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Applied science. Introduction.

作者信息

Bud Robert

机构信息

Science museum, exhibition road, London SW7 2DD, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Isis. 2012 Sep;103(3):515-7. doi: 10.1086/667971.

DOI:10.1086/667971
PMID:23286189
Abstract

Such categories as applied science and pure science can be thought of as "ideological." They have been contested in the public sphere, exposing long-term intellectual commitments, assumptions, balances of power, and material interests. This group of essays explores the contest over applied science in Britain and the United States during the nineteenth century. The essays look at the concept in the context of a variety of neighbors, including pure science, technology, and art. They are closely related and connected to contemporary historiographic debate. Jennifer Alexander links the issues raised to a recent paper by Paul Forman. Paul Lucier and Graeme Gooday deal with the debates in the last quarter of the century in the United States and Britain, respectively. Robert Bud deals with the earlier part of the nineteenth century, with an eye specifically on the variety of concepts hybridized under the heading of "applied science." Eric Schatzberg looks at the erosion of the earlier concept of art. As a whole, the essays illuminate both long-term changes and nuanced debate and are themselves intended to provoke further reflection on science in the public sphere.

摘要

相似文献

1
Applied science. Introduction.
Isis. 2012 Sep;103(3):515-7. doi: 10.1086/667971.
2
From art to applied science.从艺术到应用科学。
Isis. 2012 Sep;103(3):555-63. doi: 10.1086/667979.
3
The origins of pure and applied science in Gilded Age America.镀金时代美国纯科学与应用科学的起源。
Isis. 2012 Sep;103(3):527-36. doi: 10.1086/667976.
4
[Science, technology or art? Different concepts of medicine in the "Corpus Hippocraticum"].[科学、技术还是艺术?《希波克拉底文集》中不同的医学概念]
Sudhoffs Arch Z Wissenschaftsgesch Beih. 2004(54):67-89.
5
"Applied science": a phrase in search of a meaning.“应用科学”:一个在探寻意义的短语。
Isis. 2012 Sep;103(3):537-45. doi: 10.1086/667977.
6
Thinking again about science in technology.再次思考技术中的科学。
Isis. 2012 Sep;103(3):518-26. doi: 10.1086/667975.
7
The great contrarian: John Ruskin.伟大的反传统者:约翰·罗斯金。
Clin Chem. 2012 Oct;58(10):1502-3. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.182030.
8
"Vague and artificial": the historically elusive distinction between pure and applied science.“模糊且人为的”:纯科学与应用科学之间历史上难以捉摸的区别。
Isis. 2012 Sep;103(3):546-54. doi: 10.1086/667978.
9
[Integration of the natural sciences, arts and technics in the light of Jedrzej Sniadecki's views].
Przegl Lek. 1968;24(11):802-5.
10
Essay review: the instrument trade in Britain.
Ann Sci. 1997 Mar;54(2):197-206. doi: 10.1080/00033799700200521.

引用本文的文献

1
Can marketplace science be trusted?市场科学可信吗?
Nature. 2019 Oct;574(7779):481-485. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03172-5.
2
What is Basic Research? Insights from Historical Semantics.什么是基础研究?来自历史语义学的见解。
Minerva. 2014;52(3):273-328. doi: 10.1007/s11024-014-9255-0.