Suppr超能文献

操作技能直接观察法(DOPS)的有效性、可靠性、可行性、可接受性及教育影响。

Validity, reliability, feasibility, acceptability and educational impact of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS).

作者信息

Naeem Naghma

机构信息

King Saud University Chair for Medical Education Research and Development, Riyadh, KSA.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Jan;23(1):77-82.

Abstract

Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) is a new workplace assessment tool. The aim of this narrative review of literature is to summarize the available evidence about the validity, reliability, feasibility, acceptability and educational impact of DOPS. A PubMed database and Google search of the literature on DOPS published from January 2000 to January 2012 was conducted which yielded 30 articles. Thirteen articles were selected for full text reading and review. In the reviewed literature, DOPS was found to be a useful tool for assessment of procedural skills, but further research is required to prove its utility as a workplace based assessment instrument.

摘要

操作技能直接观察法(DOPS)是一种新型的工作场所评估工具。本叙述性文献综述的目的是总结关于DOPS的有效性、可靠性、可行性、可接受性及教育影响的现有证据。对2000年1月至2012年1月期间发表的关于DOPS的文献进行了PubMed数据库和谷歌搜索,共获得30篇文章。选取了13篇文章进行全文阅读和综述。在所综述的文献中,发现DOPS是评估操作技能的有用工具,但需要进一步研究以证明其作为基于工作场所的评估工具的效用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验