Suppr超能文献

诊断性胃镜操作技能的直接观察评估(DOPS):全国范围内培训期间有效性和能力发展的证据。

Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessment in diagnostic gastroscopy: nationwide evidence of validity and competency development during training.

机构信息

Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.

Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):105-114. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06737-7. Epub 2019 Mar 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Validated competency assessment tools and the data supporting milestone development during gastroscopy training are lacking. We aimed to assess the validity of the formative direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessment tool in diagnostic gastroscopy and study competency development using DOPS.

METHODS

This was a prospective multicentre (N = 275) analysis of formative gastroscopy DOPS assessments. Internal structure validity was tested using exploratory factor analysis and reliability estimated using generalisability theory. Item and global DOPS scores were stratified by lifetime procedure count to define learning curves, using a threshold determined from receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of DOPS competence.

RESULTS

In total, 10086 DOPS were submitted for 987 trainees. Exploratory factor analysis identified three distinct item groupings, representing 'pre-procedure', 'technical', and 'post-procedure non-technical' skills. From generalisability analyses, sources of variance in overall DOPS scores included trainee ability (31%), assessor stringency (8%), assessor subjectivity (18%), and trainee case-to-case variation (43%). The combination of three assessments from three assessors was sufficient to achieve the reliability threshold of 0.70. On ROC analysis, a mean score of 3.9 provided optimal sensitivity and specificity for determining competency. This threshold was attained in the order of 'pre-procedure' (100-124 procedures), 'technical' (150-174 procedures), 'post-procedure non-technical' skills (200-224 procedures), and global competency (225-249 procedures). Higher lifetime procedure count, DOPS count, surgical trainees and assessors, higher trainee seniority, and lower case difficulty were significant multivariable predictors of DOPS competence.

CONCLUSION

This study establishes milestones for competency acquisition during gastroscopy training and provides validity and reliability evidence to support gastroscopy DOPS as a competency assessment tool.

摘要

背景

缺乏经过验证的能力评估工具以及支持内窥镜培训中里程碑发展的数据。我们旨在评估诊断性内窥镜检查中形成性直接观察程序技能(DOPS)评估工具的有效性,并使用 DOPS 研究能力发展。

方法

这是一项针对形成性内窥镜 DOPS 评估的前瞻性多中心(N=275)分析。使用探索性因素分析测试内部结构有效性,并使用概化理论估计可靠性。根据接收器操作特征(ROC)分析确定的阈值,通过对总 DOPS 评分和项目 DOPS 评分进行分层,来定义学习曲线,根据终生手术次数来定义。使用多变量二项逻辑回归分析确定 DOPS 能力的独立预测因素。

结果

共提交了 10086 次 DOPS 评估,涉及 987 名学员。探索性因素分析确定了三个不同的项目分组,分别代表“术前”、“技术”和“术后非技术”技能。从概化分析来看,总 DOPS 评分的方差来源包括学员能力(31%)、评估者严格程度(8%)、评估者主观性(18%)和学员病例间差异(43%)。三位评估者的三次评估组合足以达到 0.70 的可靠性阈值。在 ROC 分析中,平均得分为 3.9 时,可实现最佳的敏感性和特异性,以确定能力。该阈值是按“术前”(100-124 次手术)、“技术”(150-174 次手术)、“术后非技术”技能(200-224 次手术)和总体能力(225-249 次手术)的顺序达到的。较高的终生手术次数、DOPS 次数、外科学员和评估者、较高的学员资历和较低的病例难度是 DOPS 能力的重要多变量预测因素。

结论

本研究确定了在内窥镜培训中获得能力的里程碑,并提供了有效性和可靠性证据,支持 DOPS 作为内窥镜检查的能力评估工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee61/6946748/fb6c1664b27b/464_2019_6737_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Training and assessment in flexible sigmoidoscopy: using a novel direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessment tool.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2019 Mar;28(1):33-40. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.281.nov.
3
Validity Evidence for Direct Observation of Procedural Skills in Paediatric Gastroscopy.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018 Dec;67(6):e111-e116. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002089.
5
Paediatric Colonoscopy Direct Observation of Procedural Skills: Evidence of Validity and Competency Development.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019 Jul;69(1):18-23. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002321.
6
ERCP assessment tool: evidence of validity and competency development during training.
Endoscopy. 2019 Nov;51(11):1017-1026. doi: 10.1055/a-0991-0044. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
7
Changes in scoring of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) forms and the impact on competence assessment.
Endoscopy. 2018 Aug;50(8):770-778. doi: 10.1055/a-0576-6667. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
10
DOPS assessment: a study to evaluate the experience and opinions of trainees and assessors.
Med Teach. 2013 Jun;35(6):e1230-4. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.746447. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills on Learning and Satisfaction of Students in Community Dentistry Course.
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2024 Apr 1;12(2):111-117. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2023.100431.1890. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
A journey towards pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy and its training: a narrative review.
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jul 28;11:1201593. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1201593. eCollection 2023.
7
Simulator-based training method in gastrointestinal endoscopy training and currently available simulators.
Clin Endosc. 2023 Jan;56(1):1-13. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.191. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
8
Review of the validity of DOPS as an assessment tool for the procedural skills of surgical trainees.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Sep;105(7):599-606. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0052. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
9
Face validity of a virtual reality simulation platform to improve competency in endoscopy: a prospective observational cohort study.
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Sep 14;10(9):E1218-E1224. doi: 10.1055/a-1882-4246. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
JAG consensus statements for training and certification in oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 24;13(3):193-205. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101907. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) on endoscopy services in the UK and beyond.
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;10(2):93-106. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-100969. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
3
Training in Endoscopy.
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep;16(3):345-361. doi: 10.1007/s11938-018-0191-1.
4
Changes in scoring of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) forms and the impact on competence assessment.
Endoscopy. 2018 Aug;50(8):770-778. doi: 10.1055/a-0576-6667. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
5
Validation of educational assessments: a primer for simulation and beyond.
Adv Simul (Lond). 2016 Dec 7;1:31. doi: 10.1186/s41077-016-0033-y. eCollection 2016.
6
Intubation failure during gastroscopy: incidence, predictors and follow-up findings.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2017 Dec;26(4):339-344. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.264.isq.
7
Assessment of trainees' performance in colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):270-271. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.018.
8
SAGES rebuttal.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Oct;86(4):751-754. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.007.
9
Development and roll out of the JETS e-portfolio: a web based electronic portfolio for endoscopists.
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;2(1):35-42. doi: 10.1136/fg.2010.003269. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
10
Dedicated Barrett's surveillance sessions managed by trained endoscopists improve dysplasia detection rate.
Endoscopy. 2017 Jun;49(6):524-528. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-103410. Epub 2017 Apr 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验