Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland and Auckland Southern Cross Hospital Group, Auckland, New Zealand.
Anaesthesia. 2013 Apr;68(4):382-90. doi: 10.1111/anae.12119. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
In-plane vs out-of-plane needle-probe alignment for perineural catheter placement remains controversial. Patients presenting for major knee surgery were randomly assigned to out-of-plane (n = 42) or in-plane (n = 39) needle-probe alignment for femoral nerve catheter placement, with both techniques using short-axis nerve imaging. Twenty millilitres of ropivacaine 0.5% was administered via the catheter followed by a ropivacaine elastomeric infusion incorporating on-demand boluses. All patients received pre-operative single-injection sciatic and obturator blocks and general anaesthesia. The primary outcome, numerically rated worst pain on movement (0-10) during the first 24 h, demonstrated equivalence within two points of the scale at a 5% significance level using two one-sided tests (corresponding 90% CI -1.2 to 0.6). There were no differences between groups for all secondary outcomes, including numerically rated worst rest pain, ropivacaine bolus and tramadol consumption. These results suggest that for ultrasound-guided femoral catheter placement using short-axis nerve imaging, operators should use the needle-probe alignment technique with which they are most familiar.
对于神经周围导管放置的平面内与平面外进针-探头校准,目前仍存在争议。本研究将拟行膝关节大手术的患者随机分配至平面外(n = 42)或平面内(n = 39)进针-探头校准组,两组均采用短轴神经成像技术。通过导管给予 0.5%罗哌卡因 20ml,随后使用包含按需推注的罗哌卡因弹性输注。所有患者均接受术前单次坐骨神经和闭孔神经阻滞以及全身麻醉。主要结局为术后 24 小时内运动时(0-10 分)最剧烈疼痛的数字评分,采用双侧单侧检验(90%CI -1.2 至 0.6),在 5%的显著性水平下,两种技术在 2 分的刻度内等效。两组在所有次要结局方面均无差异,包括数字评分的静息时最剧烈疼痛、罗哌卡因推注量和曲马多的消耗量。这些结果表明,对于采用短轴神经成像的超声引导股神经导管放置,操作人员应使用他们最熟悉的进针-探头校准技术。