Suppr超能文献

在养老院实施老年评估和决策支持:初始阶段和维持阶段的促进和阻碍因素。

Implementation of geriatric assessment and decision support in residential care homes: facilitating and impeding factors during initial and maintenance phase.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jan 5;13:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Successfully introducing and maintaining care innovations may depend on the interplay between care setting, the intervention and specific circumstances. We studied the factors influencing the introduction and maintenance of a Multidisciplinary Integrated Care model in 10 Dutch residential care homes.

METHODS

Facilitating and impeding factors were studied and compared at the time of introduction of the interRAI-LTCF assessment method in residential care homes as well as three years later, by surveys and semi structured interviews among nurse staff, managers, and physicians.

RESULTS

Facilitating factors at introduction were positive opinions of staff and family physicians about the changes of the process of care and the anticipated improvement of quality of care. Staff was positive about the applicability of the software to support the interRAI-LTCF assessments. Impeding factors were time constraints to complete interRAI-LTCF assessments and insufficient computer equipment.In the maintenance phase, the positive attitude of the location manager and the perceived benefits of the care model and the interRAI-LTCF assessment method were most important. Impeding factors after 3 years remained the lack of time to complete the assessments and lack of sufficient computer equipment.

CONCLUSIONS

Impeding and facilitating factors were comparable in the initial and maintenance phase. Adoption of the interRAI-LTCF assessment method depended on positive opinions of staff and management, continuing support of staff and the availability of sufficient computer equipment.

摘要

背景

成功引入和维持护理创新可能取决于护理环境、干预措施和具体情况之间的相互作用。我们研究了 10 家荷兰养老院引入和维持多学科综合护理模式的影响因素。

方法

在养老院引入 interRAI-LTCF 评估方法时以及三年后,通过对护士、经理和医生进行调查和半结构化访谈,研究并比较了促进因素和阻碍因素。

结果

引入时的促进因素是员工和家庭医生对护理流程变化的积极看法以及预期的护理质量提高。员工对软件支持 interRAI-LTCF 评估的适用性持积极态度。阻碍因素是完成 interRAI-LTCF 评估的时间限制和计算机设备不足。在维护阶段,地点经理的积极态度以及对护理模式和 interRAI-LTCF 评估方法的感知益处最为重要。3 年后,阻碍因素仍然是完成评估的时间不足和计算机设备不足。

结论

在初始和维护阶段,促进因素和阻碍因素具有可比性。采用 interRAI-LTCF 评估方法取决于员工和管理层的积极意见、员工的持续支持以及足够的计算机设备的可用性。

相似文献

2
Reliability of the interRAI Long Term Care Facilities (LTCF) and interRAI Home Care (HC).
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Feb;15(2):220-8. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12330. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
3
Staff experiences with implementing a case conferencing care model in nursing homes: a focus group study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 27;19(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4034-0.
8
User experience of interRAI assessment tools in New Zealand.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:744-8.
9
Does using the interRAI Palliative Care instrument reduce the needs and symptoms of nursing home residents receiving palliative care?
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Feb;16(1):32-40. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000153. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
10
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.

引用本文的文献

2
Implementing the interRAI Check-Up Comprehensive Assessment: Facilitating Care Planning and Care Coordination during the Pandemic.
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Apr 10;23(2):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7007. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
4
Instrument development and validation of the comprehensive ability of older people assessment scale.
Nurs Open. 2021 Nov;8(6):3073-3085. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1020. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
5
6
Advancing health information technology roadmaps in long term care.
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Apr;136:104088. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104088. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
7

本文引用的文献

2
Comprehensive care for older adults: case management approach.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jun;58(6):1202-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02884.x.
3
Reforming long-term care in the United States: findings from a national survey of specialists.
Gerontologist. 2010 Apr;50(2):238-52. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp111. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
4
Learning and improving in quality improvement collaboratives: which collaborative features do participants value most?
Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr;44(2 Pt 1):359-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00923.x. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
7
Care management for older people: does integration make a difference?
J Interprof Care. 2006 Aug;20(4):335-48. doi: 10.1080/13561820600727130.
8
Home care before and after the Balanced Budget Act of 1997: shifts in financing and services.
Gerontologist. 2004 Feb;44(1):39-47. doi: 10.1093/geront/44.1.39.
9
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Aug;12(4):298-303. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.4.298.
10
Improving nursing home quality of care through outcomes data: the MDS quality indicators.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;18(3):250-7. doi: 10.1002/gps.820.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验