Institute for Clinical Research and Development (IKFE), Mainz, Germany.
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2013 Jul;10(4):302-14. doi: 10.1177/1479164112465442. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
We conducted a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies to evaluate all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who received sulphonylurea (SU) treatment, when compared to any other diabetes treatment. Only studies reporting raw data on mortality during SU treatment were included. Data were combined using random-effects (RE) models. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) are presented. Of 4991 publication titles and abstracts reviewed, 20 studies (n = 551,912 patients) were included. For cohort studies (n = 276,050), patients receiving SU monotherapy or combination treatment had significantly higher all-cause and CV mortality risks compared to any non-SU treatment [all-cause, 13 studies: OR = 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.48-2.49; CV, 5 studies: OR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.95-3.79]. Validity was limited by the high treatment group heterogeneity (I (2) > 90%) and study-inherent biases/design differences. In conclusion, patients receiving SU treatment had increased all-cause and CV mortality risks. However, the meta-analysis was limited by the high heterogeneity of non-randomized studies.
我们进行了一项荟萃分析,包括队列研究和病例对照研究,以评估接受磺脲类药物(SU)治疗的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的全因和心血管(CV)死亡率,与任何其他糖尿病治疗相比。仅纳入报告 SU 治疗期间死亡率原始数据的研究。使用随机效应(RE)模型合并数据。呈现未经调整的优势比(OR)。在对 4991 篇出版物标题和摘要进行审查后,纳入了 20 项研究(n = 551912 名患者)。对于队列研究(n = 276050 名患者),接受 SU 单药或联合治疗的患者与任何非 SU 治疗相比,全因和 CV 死亡率风险显著增加[全因,13 项研究:OR = 1.92,95%置信区间(CI)= 1.48-2.49;CV,5 项研究:OR = 2.72,95% CI = 1.95-3.79]。有效性受到治疗组高度异质性(I(2)> 90%)和研究内在偏倚/设计差异的限制。总之,接受 SU 治疗的患者全因和 CV 死亡率风险增加。然而,荟萃分析受到非随机研究高度异质性的限制。