Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-8830, USA.
Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-8830, USA.
Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Jul 14;18(9):64. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-1035-z.
With recent cardiovascular outcome trial (CVOT) results for antihyperglycemic medications, the treatment algorithm for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASCVD) requires revision.
All completed CVOTs have demonstrated CV safety of the tested medications, with some trials demonstrating CV efficacy. While metformin remains the first-line recommended medication for T2DM, 18-37% of the patients enrolled in the completed CVOTs were not treated with metformin, providing substantial power to assess CV outcomes independent of metformin. The safety and tolerability of metformin are indisputable, but there are no robust data proving its efficacy for either macro or microvascular disease outcomes. We should reconsider the primacy of metformin in the management of T2DM in patients with ASCVD. This article will review the evidence for CV effects of antihyperglycemic agents (AHAs), and propose an evidence-based treatment algorithm for patients with T2DM and ASCVD.
随着近期抗高血糖药物心血管结局试验(CVOT)结果的公布,患有 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)和动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病(ASCVD)患者的治疗方案需要修改。
所有已完成的 CVOT 均证明了所测试药物的心血管安全性,一些试验还证明了其心血管疗效。虽然二甲双胍仍然是 T2DM 的一线推荐药物,但在已完成的 CVOT 中,有 18%-37%的患者未接受二甲双胍治疗,这为独立于二甲双胍评估心血管结局提供了充分的依据。二甲双胍的安全性和耐受性不容置疑,但没有确凿的数据证明其对大血管或微血管疾病结局有效。我们应该重新考虑在 ASCVD 患者的 T2DM 管理中二甲双胍的首要地位。本文将回顾抗高血糖药物(AHA)对心血管影响的证据,并为患有 T2DM 和 ASCVD 的患者提出一个基于证据的治疗方案。