Bruce and Ruth Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):410-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.025. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
Data on the role of colonoscopy in hematochezia are almost exclusively derived from clinical experience in tertiary care practice.
To characterize the patient population who received colonoscopy for hematochezia in a consortium of diverse gastroenterology practices.
Retrospective analysis.
Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative Database, 2002 to 2008.
Adults undergoing colonoscopy for the indication of hematochezia.
Demographics, comorbidity, practice setting, adverse events, and colonoscopy procedure characteristics and findings. Age-stratified analyses and analyses of inpatient- versus outpatient-performed colonoscopies were also performed.
A total of 966,536 colonoscopies were performed during the study period, 76,186 (7.9%) were performed for evaluation of hematochezia. The majority of patients were white non-Hispanic men younger than 60 years old who underwent colonoscopy at a community practice site (79.1%) and had a low-risk American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (81.5%), in whom colonoscopy reached the cecum (94.8%), and serious adverse events were rare. Colonoscopy findings were hemorrhoids (64.4%), diverticulosis (38.6%), and polyp or multiple polyps (38.8%). From the overall cohort, 38.3% were 60 years of age and older. The older age cohort had significantly more white non-Hispanic females, high-risk ASA scores, incomplete colonoscopies, and unplanned events. Colonoscopy findings demonstrated significantly higher rates of diverticulosis, polyp or multiple polyps, mucosal abnormality/colitis, tumor, and solitary ulcer (P < .0001). There were 3941 (5.2%) who underwent inpatient-performed colonoscopy. One third of this cohort (32.6%) was defined as having a high ASA score.
Retrospective database review.
These results describe patient populations and characterize colonoscopy findings in individuals presenting with hematochezia primarily in a community practice setting.
有关结肠镜检查在血便中的作用的数据几乎完全来自三级保健实践中的临床经验。
描述在不同的胃肠病学实践联合体中因血便而行结肠镜检查的患者人群特征。
回顾性分析。
临床结果研究倡议数据库,2002 年至 2008 年。
因血便而行结肠镜检查的成年人。
人口统计学、合并症、实践环境、不良事件以及结肠镜检查程序的特征和结果。还进行了年龄分层分析和住院与门诊进行的结肠镜检查的分析。
在研究期间共进行了 966536 例结肠镜检查,其中 76186 例(7.9%)用于评估血便。大多数患者为 60 岁以下的白人非西班牙裔男性,他们在社区实践场所接受结肠镜检查(79.1%),美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分低危(81.5%),结肠镜检查到达盲肠(94.8%),且严重不良事件罕见。结肠镜检查结果为痔疮(64.4%)、憩室病(38.6%)和息肉或多发性息肉(38.8%)。在整个队列中,38.3%的患者年龄在 60 岁及以上。年龄较大的队列中,白人非西班牙裔女性、高危 ASA 评分、不完全结肠镜检查和非计划事件的比例显著更高。结肠镜检查结果显示,憩室病、息肉或多发性息肉、黏膜异常/结肠炎、肿瘤和单发溃疡的发生率显著更高(P<.0001)。有 3941 例(5.2%)患者接受住院患者行结肠镜检查。该队列的三分之一(32.6%)被定义为具有高危 ASA 评分。
回顾性数据库审查。
这些结果描述了主要在社区实践环境中出现血便的患者人群特征,并描述了结肠镜检查结果。