Laboratoire de Pharmacie Galénique Industrielle, EA 4169 Fonctions Physiologiques et Pathologiques de Barrière Cutanée, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, F-69373 Lyon Cedex 08, France.
Int J Pharm. 2013 Feb 25;443(1-2):146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.12.038. Epub 2013 Jan 6.
Medication in patients undergoing enteral intubation addresses various challenging issues considering safety and treatment efficiency. Ideally, other routes of administration (i.e. intravenous or intramuscular routes) or especially dedicated formulations should be used. However, in absence of liquid dosage form, tablets or pills must be crushed and suspended in a vehicle before administration. The administration of oral dosage forms by enteral tube is usually performed by the nursing staff facing (i) pharmaceutical relevance of crushing, (ii) loss and concomitant aero-contamination of drug substance, (iii) drug-nutriment interactions and (iv) enteral feeding tube clogging. In the present study, different combinations of either open or confined crushing and suspending protocols were compared by taking into account the crushing yield, the stability and granulometry of the solid oral form suspension and finally the extend of aerosol contamination during crushing and suspending. All protocols exhibited comparable crushing efficiency and suspending properties, but significantly higher aerosolisation of tablet particles was observed in both open crushing and suspending protocol. Therefore, both confined crushing and suspending protocol constitutes an efficient, time saving and safe alternative to the absence of available liquid dosage form for intubated patients.
在进行肠内插管的患者中,药物治疗涉及到许多安全和治疗效率方面的挑战问题。理想情况下,应使用其他给药途径(即静脉或肌肉途径)或专门的制剂。然而,在没有液体剂型的情况下,片剂或胶囊必须被粉碎并混悬于载体中再给药。护理人员通过肠内管给予口服剂型时通常会面临以下问题:(i)粉碎的药物相关性,(ii)药物损失和伴随的空气药物污染,(iii)药物-营养物相互作用,以及(iv)肠内喂养管堵塞。在本研究中,通过考虑粉碎产率、固体口服剂型混悬液的稳定性和粒度以及粉碎和混悬过程中的气溶胶污染程度,比较了开放粉碎和封闭粉碎及混悬方案的不同组合。所有方案均表现出相似的粉碎效率和混悬特性,但在开放粉碎和混悬方案中观察到更高的片剂颗粒气溶胶化程度。因此,对于无法使用现有液体制剂的插管患者,封闭粉碎和混悬方案是一种高效、省时且安全的替代方案。