Radboud University Nijmegen, Behavioural Science Institute, Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2013 May-Jun;48(3):312-21. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/ags133. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a web-based brief alcohol intervention 'What Do You Drink' (WDYD) among heavy drinking students at 1- and 6-month post-intervention. Additionally, it was investigated whether certain subgroups would benefit more than others from the WDYD intervention.
A two-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial was conducted online in the Netherlands in 2010-2011. Inclusion criteria were: (1) being between 18- and 24-year old, (2) reporting heavy drinking in the past 6 months, (3) being motivated to change alcohol consumption, (4) having access to the Internet and (5) giving informed consent. Participants (n = 913) were randomized to the experimental (WDYD intervention) or control condition (no intervention). Measures were heavy drinking, frequency of binge drinking and weekly alcohol consumption.
Analyses according to the intention-to-treat principle revealed no significant main intervention effects in reducing the alcohol measures at the follow-up assessments. Secondary analyses revealed that gender, freshmen and fraternity or sorority membership did not moderate the effect of the WDYD intervention at both follow-ups. Readiness to change, problem drinking and carnival participation moderated intervention effects such that contemplators, those with severe symptoms of alcohol abuse or dependence, and those who participated in carnival benefited more than others from the WDYD intervention regarding weekly alcohol consumption at 1-month follow-up.
The WDYD intervention was not effective in reducing the alcohol measures among heavy drinking students at 1- and 6-month post-intervention. However, there is preliminary evidence that the WDYD intervention is effective in lowering drinking levels for subgroups of heavy drinking students in the short term.
评估基于网络的简短酒精干预“你喝什么”(WDYD)在 1 个月和 6 个月干预后对重度饮酒学生的有效性。此外,还研究了某些亚组是否会比其他亚组从 WDYD 干预中获益更多。
这是一项在荷兰于 2010 年至 2011 年进行的两臂平行组随机对照试验。纳入标准为:(1)年龄在 18 至 24 岁之间,(2)报告过去 6 个月内重度饮酒,(3)有改变饮酒习惯的动机,(4)能够访问互联网,(5)知情同意。参与者(n=913)被随机分配到实验组(WDYD 干预)或对照组(无干预)。测量指标为重度饮酒、 binge 饮酒频率和每周饮酒量。
根据意向治疗原则进行的分析显示,在减少随访评估中的酒精测量值方面,干预没有显著的主要效果。二次分析表明,性别、新生和联谊会或兄弟会成员身份并没有在两次随访中调节 WDYD 干预的效果。改变的准备、饮酒问题和狂欢节参与度调节了干预效果,使得考虑者、有严重酒精滥用或依赖症状的人以及参加狂欢节的人在 1 个月随访时,从 WDYD 干预中获益更多,体现在每周饮酒量上。
在 1 个月和 6 个月的干预后,WDYD 干预对重度饮酒学生的酒精测量值没有效果。然而,有初步证据表明,在短期内,WDYD 干预对重度饮酒学生的某些亚组降低饮酒水平是有效的。