O'Donnell N, Corcoran D, Lucey B, Barrett A
Department of Medical Microbiology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Br J Biomed Sci. 2012;69(4):164-8.
Many mycobacterial species are pathogenic to humans, with infection occurring worldwide. Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a well-described global phenomenon, but other mycobacterial species are increasingly shown to be the cause of both pulmonary and extrapulmonary infection and are managed differently from M. tuberculosis infection. Rapid and accurate differentiation of mycobacterial species is, therefore, critical to guide timely and appropriate therapeutic and public health management. This study evaluates two commercially available DNA strip assays, the Genotype Common Mycobacteria (CM) assay (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) and the Speed-oligo Mycobacteria assay (Vircell, Spain) for their usefulness in a clinical laboratory setting. Both assays were evaluated on 71 clinical mycobacterial isolates, previously identified using Gen-Probe AccuProbe and through a UK mycobacteriology reference laboratory, as well as 29 non-mycobacterial isolates. Concordant results were obtained for 98% of isolates using both assays. The sensitivity was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 93.3-100%) for the CM assay and 98.6% (95% CI: 95.9-100%) for the Speed-oligo assay. Overall, both assays proved to be useful tools for rapid and sensitive mycobacterial species identification, although interpretation of results was easier with the CM assay. Finally, results were available within one day, compared to current identification times which range between seven days and four weeks.
许多分枝杆菌对人类具有致病性,感染在全球范围内都有发生。结核分枝杆菌感染是一种广为人知的全球现象,但其他分枝杆菌种类越来越多地被证明是肺部和肺外感染的病因,且其治疗方式与结核分枝杆菌感染不同。因此,快速准确地区分分枝杆菌种类对于指导及时、恰当的治疗和公共卫生管理至关重要。本研究评估了两种市售的DNA条带检测方法,即基因型常见分枝杆菌(CM)检测法(德国内伦海因生命科学公司)和快速寡核苷酸分枝杆菌检测法(西班牙维塞尔公司)在临床实验室环境中的实用性。这两种检测方法均在71株临床分枝杆菌分离株上进行了评估,这些分离株先前已通过基因探针AccuProbe并经英国分枝杆菌学参考实验室鉴定,同时还评估了29株非分枝杆菌分离株。两种检测方法对98%的分离株得出了一致结果。CM检测法的灵敏度为97%(95%置信区间[CI]:93.3 - 100%),快速寡核苷酸检测法的灵敏度为98.6%(95% CI:95.9 - 100%)。总体而言,尽管CM检测法的结果解读更简单,但这两种检测方法都被证明是快速、灵敏地鉴定分枝杆菌种类的有用工具。最后,与目前鉴定时间在7天至4周之间相比,一天内即可获得结果。