• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实验室环境中基于分子的分枝杆菌鉴定:两种方法的比较

Molecular-based mycobacterial identification in a clinical laboratory setting: a comparison of two methods.

作者信息

O'Donnell N, Corcoran D, Lucey B, Barrett A

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Br J Biomed Sci. 2012;69(4):164-8.

PMID:23304792
Abstract

Many mycobacterial species are pathogenic to humans, with infection occurring worldwide. Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a well-described global phenomenon, but other mycobacterial species are increasingly shown to be the cause of both pulmonary and extrapulmonary infection and are managed differently from M. tuberculosis infection. Rapid and accurate differentiation of mycobacterial species is, therefore, critical to guide timely and appropriate therapeutic and public health management. This study evaluates two commercially available DNA strip assays, the Genotype Common Mycobacteria (CM) assay (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) and the Speed-oligo Mycobacteria assay (Vircell, Spain) for their usefulness in a clinical laboratory setting. Both assays were evaluated on 71 clinical mycobacterial isolates, previously identified using Gen-Probe AccuProbe and through a UK mycobacteriology reference laboratory, as well as 29 non-mycobacterial isolates. Concordant results were obtained for 98% of isolates using both assays. The sensitivity was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 93.3-100%) for the CM assay and 98.6% (95% CI: 95.9-100%) for the Speed-oligo assay. Overall, both assays proved to be useful tools for rapid and sensitive mycobacterial species identification, although interpretation of results was easier with the CM assay. Finally, results were available within one day, compared to current identification times which range between seven days and four weeks.

摘要

许多分枝杆菌对人类具有致病性,感染在全球范围内都有发生。结核分枝杆菌感染是一种广为人知的全球现象,但其他分枝杆菌种类越来越多地被证明是肺部和肺外感染的病因,且其治疗方式与结核分枝杆菌感染不同。因此,快速准确地区分分枝杆菌种类对于指导及时、恰当的治疗和公共卫生管理至关重要。本研究评估了两种市售的DNA条带检测方法,即基因型常见分枝杆菌(CM)检测法(德国内伦海因生命科学公司)和快速寡核苷酸分枝杆菌检测法(西班牙维塞尔公司)在临床实验室环境中的实用性。这两种检测方法均在71株临床分枝杆菌分离株上进行了评估,这些分离株先前已通过基因探针AccuProbe并经英国分枝杆菌学参考实验室鉴定,同时还评估了29株非分枝杆菌分离株。两种检测方法对98%的分离株得出了一致结果。CM检测法的灵敏度为97%(95%置信区间[CI]:93.3 - 100%),快速寡核苷酸检测法的灵敏度为98.6%(95% CI:95.9 - 100%)。总体而言,尽管CM检测法的结果解读更简单,但这两种检测方法都被证明是快速、灵敏地鉴定分枝杆菌种类的有用工具。最后,与目前鉴定时间在7天至4周之间相比,一天内即可获得结果。

相似文献

1
Molecular-based mycobacterial identification in a clinical laboratory setting: a comparison of two methods.临床实验室环境中基于分子的分枝杆菌鉴定:两种方法的比较
Br J Biomed Sci. 2012;69(4):164-8.
2
[Evaluation of the distribution of non-tuberculous mycobacteria strains isolated in National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory in 2009-2010, Turkey].[2009 - 2010年土耳其国家结核病参考实验室分离的非结核分枝杆菌菌株分布评估]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2012 Oct;46(4):560-7.
3
Evaluation of the GenoType Mycobacteria Direct assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and four atypical mycobacterial species in clinical samples.评估用于检测临床样本中结核分枝杆菌复合群和四种非结核分枝杆菌的GenoType分枝杆菌直接检测法。
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Aug;44(8):3025-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00068-06.
4
Evaluation of the GenoType Mycobacteria Direct assay for the simultaneous detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and four atypical mycobacterial species in smear-positive respiratory specimens.评估GenoType分枝杆菌直接检测法在涂片阳性呼吸道标本中同时检测结核分枝杆菌复合群和四种非结核分枝杆菌的性能。
J Med Microbiol. 2008 May;57(Pt 5):605-611. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47484-0.
5
Evaluation of a membrane array for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and nontuberculous mycobacteria in positive liquid cultures.膜阵列检测阳性液体培养物中的结核分枝杆菌复合群和非结核分枝杆菌的评估。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;75(4):337-41. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.01.009.
6
[Mycobacterial tests].[分枝杆菌检测]
Kekkaku. 2008 Jan;83(1):43-59.
7
[The comparison between two methods for typing of nontuberculous mycobacteria: high pressure liquid chromatography and molecular assay GenoType Mycobacterium CM/AS].[两种非结核分枝杆菌分型方法的比较:高压液相色谱法和GenoType分枝杆菌CM/AS分子检测法]
Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2010;78(5):363-8.
8
[Identification of atypical mycobacteria isolated from clinical specimens by line probe assay (LIPA)].[通过线性探针分析(LIPA)鉴定从临床标本中分离出的非典型分枝杆菌]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2007 Oct;41(4):503-10.
9
[Atypical mycobacteria and pulmonary involvement in infectious diseases].[非典型分枝杆菌与传染病中的肺部受累]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2011 Dec;29 Suppl 5:66-75. doi: 10.1016/S0213-005X(11)70046-5.
10
Rapid Identification of Clinically Relevant Species by Multicolor Melting Curve Analysis.采用多色熔解曲线分析快速鉴定临床相关种属。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jan 2;57(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01096-18. Print 2019 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of a molecular assay to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA in clinical specimens: multicenter study in Brazil.用于检测临床标本中结核分枝杆菌复合群DNA的分子检测方法的性能:巴西的多中心研究
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2017 Feb;112(2):94-99. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760160196.
2
Evaluation of four molecular methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patients.对四种分子方法在免疫功能低下患者的肺部和血液样本中诊断结核病的评估。
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014 Sep;109(6):805-13. doi: 10.1590/0074-0276130542. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
3
A multicenter clinical evaluation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis IgG/IgM antibody detection using the colloidal gold method.
采用胶体金法检测结核分枝杆菌IgG/IgM抗体的多中心临床评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Nov;33(11):1989-94. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2150-7. Epub 2014 Jun 10.