• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与下腔静脉滤器使用的地域差异相关的临床、人口统计学和医学法律因素:州际分析。

Clinical, demographic, and medicolegal factors associated with geographic variation in inferior vena cava filter utilization: an interstate analysis.

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Surgery. 2013 May;153(5):683-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.11.005. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2012.11.005
PMID:23305597
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Geographic variability exists in the use of IVC filters (IVCF). We hypothesized that variation in IVCF use is incompletely explained by variation in the prevalence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) and may result from different practice patterns regarding prophylactic IVCF use. We characterize geographic variation in IVCF use at the state level and evaluate its association with clinical factors, patient demographics, and the medicolegal environment.

METHODS

Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database records were accessed to identify 230,445 IVCFs placed from 2006 to 2008 in 33 states. Similar queries were performed for DVT and PE. Additional state data were obtained from public sources. Analyses included descriptive statistics, Spearman Correlation (SC), Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and characterization of variability.

RESULTS

Overall, IVCF use correlated with the prevalence of DVT (SC = 0.89, P < .01). States on the East coast have significantly greater rates of IVCF use per 100K (mean ± SD = 41.2 ± 16.7 vs 27.8 ± 11.1, P < .05) and greater rates of IVCF per DVT (20.2 ± 4.5% vs 15.2 ± 2.9%; P < .005), despite similar rates of DVT per 100K (198.1 ± 51.2 vs 177.7 ± 46.7, P = NS) compared with all other states. Overall, states with the greatest rate of IVCF per DVT were (in descending order): Rhode Island, New Jersey, Florida, New York, and West Virginia. Rates of detected PE per 100K in these states were not significantly different from all other states (95.6 ± 16.6 vs 90.4 ± 16.1, P = NS). In these states, a greater percentage of IVCF recipients were older than 85 (15.3% vs 11.8%; P < .01); fewer were pediatric (0.3% vs 0.7%; P < .05) or aged 45 to 64 (26.1% vs 32.4%; P < .001). There were no differences in patient sex, race, insurance type, hospital size, or teaching status. States with high rates of IVCF per DVT were noted to have significantly greater rates of paid malpractice claims per 100K (4.9 ± 2.51 vs 1.1 ± 0.8; P = .001), and annual general surgeon liability insurance premiums ($78,630 ± 34,822 vs $43,989 ± 17,794; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Variation in IVCF use is incompletely explained by clinical factors. High rates of IVCF per DVT in some states may represent increased use of prophylactic IVCF in states with litigious medicolegal environments.

摘要

目的

静脉滤器(IVCF)的使用存在地域差异。我们假设,IVCF 使用的变化不能完全用深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)的流行率变化来解释,可能是由于预防使用 IVCF 的不同实践模式造成的。我们对州级别的 IVCF 使用情况进行了地域差异描述,并评估了其与临床因素、患者人口统计学特征和法医学环境的关联。

方法

访问医疗保健成本和利用项目州住院患者数据库记录,以确定 2006 年至 2008 年在 33 个州中放置的 230445 个 IVCF。对 DVT 和 PE 进行了类似的查询。从公共资源中获得了额外的州数据。分析包括描述性统计、斯皮尔曼相关系数(SC)、威尔科克森秩和检验和变异性描述。

结果

总体而言,IVCF 使用与 DVT 的流行率相关(SC = 0.89,P <.01)。东海岸各州每 10 万的 IVCF 使用量明显更高(平均值 ± SD = 41.2 ± 16.7 与 27.8 ± 11.1,P <.05),每 DVT 的 IVCF 使用量也更高(20.2 ± 4.5% 与 15.2 ± 2.9%;P <.005),尽管每 10 万 DVT 的 DVT 发生率相似(198.1 ± 51.2 与 177.7 ± 46.7,P = NS)与所有其他州相比。总体而言,每 DVT 的 IVCF 使用量最大的州(按降序排列):罗德岛、新泽西州、佛罗里达州、纽约州和西弗吉尼亚州。这些州的每 10 万检测到的 PE 率与所有其他州没有显著差异(95.6 ± 16.6 与 90.4 ± 16.1,P = NS)。在这些州,接受 IVCF 治疗的患者中,年龄大于 85 岁的比例更高(15.3% 与 11.8%;P <.01);儿科患者比例较低(0.3% 与 0.7%;P <.05)或年龄在 45 至 64 岁的患者比例较低(26.1% 与 32.4%;P <.001)。患者性别、种族、保险类型、医院规模或教学地位没有差异。发现 IVCF 每 DVT 使用量较高的州,每 10 万的支付医疗事故索赔率明显较高(4.9 ± 2.51 与 1.1 ± 0.8;P =.001),每年普外科责任保险费也较高(78630 美元 ± 34822 美元与 43989 美元 ± 17794 美元;P <.05)。

结论

IVCF 使用的变化不能完全用临床因素来解释。一些州中每 DVT 的 IVCF 使用量较高,可能反映了在法医学环境较易引发诉讼的州中预防性使用 IVCF 的增加。

相似文献

1
Clinical, demographic, and medicolegal factors associated with geographic variation in inferior vena cava filter utilization: an interstate analysis.与下腔静脉滤器使用的地域差异相关的临床、人口统计学和医学法律因素:州际分析。
Surgery. 2013 May;153(5):683-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.11.005. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
2
Practice patterns in the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in a trauma population: a single-center experience.创伤人群中可回收下腔静脉滤器的使用模式:单中心经验
J Trauma. 2009 Dec;67(6):1293-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b0637a.
3
Comprehensive assessment of prophylactic preoperative inferior vena cava filters for major spinal reconstruction in adults.成人大型脊柱重建术预防性术前下腔静脉滤器的综合评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 1;37(13):1122-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824abde2.
4
Practice patterns and outcomes of retrievable vena cava filters in trauma patients: an AAST multicenter study.创伤患者中可取出下腔静脉滤器的应用模式及结果:美国创伤外科学会多中心研究
J Trauma. 2007 Jan;62(1):17-24; discussion 24-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31802dd72a.
5
Cost-effectiveness of guidelines for insertion of inferior vena cava filters in high-risk trauma patients.低危创伤患者下腔静脉滤器置入指南的成本效益。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Dec;52(6):1537-45.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.152. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
6
[A single-center retrospective study on the intraluminal implantation of inferior vena cava filter for the lower extremity trauma patients with deep venous thrombosis].[下肢创伤合并深静脉血栓患者下腔静脉滤器腔内植入的单中心回顾性研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Apr;52(4):254-7.
7
Hospitalization metrics associated with hospital-level variation in inferior vena cava filter utilization for patients with venous thromboembolism in the United States: Implications for quality of care.美国静脉血栓栓塞症患者下腔静脉滤器应用中与医院水平变异相关的住院指标:对护理质量的影响。
Vasc Med. 2018 Aug;23(4):365-371. doi: 10.1177/1358863X18768685. Epub 2018 May 20.
8
Racial and ethnic disparities in inferior vena cava filter placement for deep vein thrombosis in the United States.美国深静脉血栓形成患者下腔静脉滤器置入的种族和民族差异。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jan;12(1):101683. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.022. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
9
Trends in vena caval interruption.腔静脉阻断趋势。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jul;52(1):118-125.e3; discussion 125-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.09.067. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
10
[Application of inferior vena cava filters in prevention of peri-operative pulmonary embolism in patients with bone fracture combined with deep venous thrombosis: a report of 572 cases].下腔静脉滤器在预防骨折合并深静脉血栓形成患者围手术期肺栓塞中的应用:附572例报告
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 May;50(5):418-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Use and Removal of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Patients With Acute Brain Injury.急性脑损伤患者下腔静脉滤器的使用与取出
Neurohospitalist. 2020 Jul;10(3):188-192. doi: 10.1177/1941874420907531. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
2
The use of inferior vena cava filters in spine trauma: A nationwide study using the National Trauma Data Bank.下腔静脉滤器在脊柱创伤中的应用:一项使用国家创伤数据库的全国性研究。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Mar;42(2):228-235. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1465284. Epub 2018 May 7.
3
Inferior vena cava filter use and patient safety: legacy or science?
下腔静脉滤器的使用与患者安全:是传统还是科学?
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017 Dec 8;2017(1):686-692. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.686.
4
Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Rates and Factors Associated With Retrieval in a Large US Cohort.腔静脉滤器取出率及与在美国大样本中取出相关的因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Sep 4;6(9):e006708. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006708.
5
Retrospective analysis of outcomes following inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement in a managed care population.对管理式医疗人群中植入下腔静脉(IVC)滤器后的结果进行回顾性分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017 Aug;44(2):179-189. doi: 10.1007/s11239-017-1507-z.
6
IVC filters-Trends in placement and indications, a study of 2 populations.下腔静脉滤器——置入情况及适应证的趋势,一项对两组人群的研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(12):e6449. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006449.
7
Local Multi-Channel RF Surface Coil versus Body RF Coil Transmission for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance at 3 Tesla: Which Configuration Is Winning the Game?3特斯拉下用于心脏磁共振成像的局部多通道射频表面线圈与体部射频线圈传输:哪种配置更具优势?
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 6;11(9):e0161863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161863. eCollection 2016.
8
Vena Caval Filter Utilization and Outcomes in Pulmonary Embolism: Medicare Hospitalizations From 1999 to 2010.腔静脉滤器在肺栓塞中的应用及转归:1999年至2010年医疗保险住院病例分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 8;67(9):1027-1035. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.028.
9
Procedural and indwelling complications with inferior vena cava filters: frequency, etiology, and management.下腔静脉滤器的操作及留置并发症:发生率、病因及处理
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015 Mar;32(1):34-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396962.
10
Inferior vena cava filters: current best practices.下腔静脉滤器:当前最佳实践
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015 Apr;39(3):315-27. doi: 10.1007/s11239-015-1187-5.