Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜再次手术治疗肝胆管结石的安全性和可行性。

The safety and feasibility of reoperation for the treatment of hepatolithiasis by laparoscopic approach.

机构信息

Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Shapingba District, Gaotanyan Road, Chongqing, 400038, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1315-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2606-8. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatolithiasis removal is associated with high rates of postoperative residual and recurrence, which in some cases may require multiple surgeries. The progress and development of laparoscopic techniques introduced a new way of treating hepatolithiasis. However, the selection criteria for laparoscopic hepatolithiasis surgery, particularly among patients with a history of biliary surgery, remain undetermined. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of reoperation for the treatment of hepatolithiasis via a laparoscopic approach.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the perioperative course and outcomes was performed on 90 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures for hepatolithiasis between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2012. Thirty-eight patients had previous biliary tract operative procedures (PB group) and 52 patients had no previous biliary tract procedures (NPB).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in operative time (342.3 ± 101.0 vs. 334.1 ± 102.7 min), intraoperative blood loss (561.2 ± 458.8 vs. 546.3 ± 570.5 ml), intraoperative transfusion (15.8 vs. 19.2 %), postoperative hospitalization (12.6 ± 4.2 vs. 13.4 % ± 6.3 days), postoperative complications (18.4 vs. 23.1 %), conversion to open laparotomy (10.5 vs. 9.6 %), or intraoperative stone clearance rate (94.7 vs. 90.4 %). There was also no significant difference in stone recurrence (7.9 vs. 11.5 %) and recurrent cholangitis (5.3 vs. 13.5 %) at a mean of 19 months of follow-up (range, 3-51 months) for PB patients compared to NPB patients. The final stone clearance rate was 100 % in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperation for hepatolithiasis by laparoscopic approach is safe and feasible for selected patients who have undergone previous biliary operations.

摘要

背景

肝内胆管结石清除术后残余和复发率较高,某些情况下可能需要多次手术。腹腔镜技术的进步和发展为肝内胆管结石的治疗带来了新的途径。然而,腹腔镜肝内胆管结石手术的选择标准,特别是在有胆道手术史的患者中,仍未确定。本研究旨在评估腹腔镜治疗肝内胆管结石的安全性、可行性和疗效。

方法

回顾性分析 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 12 月 31 日期间 90 例行腹腔镜肝内胆管结石手术患者的围手术期过程和结果。38 例患者有胆道手术史(PB 组),52 例患者无胆道手术史(NPB 组)。

结果

两组患者的手术时间(342.3±101.0 分钟比 334.1±102.7 分钟)、术中出血量(561.2±458.8 毫升比 546.3±570.5 毫升)、术中输血率(15.8%比 19.2%)、术后住院时间(12.6±4.2 天比 13.4%±6.3 天)、术后并发症发生率(18.4%比 23.1%)、中转开腹率(10.5%比 9.6%)、术中结石清除率(94.7%比 90.4%)差异均无统计学意义。在平均 19 个月(3-51 个月)的随访中,PB 组和 NPB 组结石复发率(7.9%比 11.5%)和复发性胆管炎(5.3%比 13.5%)差异均无统计学意义。两组最终结石清除率均为 100%。

结论

对于有胆道手术史的患者,腹腔镜治疗肝内胆管结石是安全可行的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验