Zeng Xintao, Yang Pei, Wang Wentao
Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu.
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital, Sichuan, Mianyang, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(46):e13080. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013080.
Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (LLH) followed by biliary tract exploration is used to treat left-sided hepatolithiasis (LSH). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 2 methods of biliary tract exploration in LLH:biliary tract exploration through a common bile duct (CBD) incision (with T-tube drainage) or through the left hepatic duct (LHD) stump (without T-tube drainage).LSH patients (113 patients) were recruited retrospectively in our hospital from December 2008 to January 2016. To compare different methods of biliary tract exploration during LLH, the patients were divided into 2 groups: 41 patients underwent biliary tract exploration through the LHD stump (LHD group), and 72 patients underwent biliary tract exploration through a CBD incision (CBD group). Baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes, surgery-related complications, postoperative hospital stay (PHS) and long-term results were compared between the 2 groups.There was no unplanned reoperation in the 2 groups. One patient in the CBD group had a residual stone, which was removed by choledochoscopy 2 months postoperation. Two patients in the LHD group and 3 patients in the CBD group had bile leakage and were cured with abdominal drainage. There were no significant differences in the total operation time, incidence of residual stones and bile leakage between the 2 groups (P > .05). The PHS and the incidence of hypokalemia or hyponatremia in the LHD group were significantly lower than those in the CBD group (P < .05). T-tube-related complications occurred in 13.9% (10/72) of the CBD patients. The mean follow-up period was 37.2 ± 13.8 months. There were no significant differences in the incidence of recurrence stones or cholangitis (P > .05) between the 2 groups.Exploration of the biliary tract through the LHD stump without T-tube drainage is safe with satisfactory short- and long-term results for selected LSH patients.
腹腔镜左半肝切除术(LLH)联合胆道探查术用于治疗左侧肝内胆管结石(LSH)。本研究旨在比较LLH中两种胆道探查方法的疗效:经胆总管(CBD)切口进行胆道探查(行T管引流)或经左肝管(LHD)残端进行胆道探查(不行T管引流)。2008年12月至2016年1月,我院对113例LSH患者进行回顾性招募。为比较LLH期间不同的胆道探查方法,将患者分为两组:41例患者经LHD残端进行胆道探查(LHD组),72例患者经CBD切口进行胆道探查(CBD组)。比较两组患者的基线特征、手术结果、手术相关并发症、术后住院时间(PHS)及长期结果。两组均无计划外再次手术。CBD组有1例患者残留结石,术后2个月经胆道镜取出。LHD组有2例患者、CBD组有3例患者发生胆漏,经腹腔引流治愈。两组患者的总手术时间、残留结石发生率及胆漏发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。LHD组的PHS及低钾血症或低钠血症发生率均显著低于CBD组(P<0.05)。CBD组13.9%(10/72)的患者发生T管相关并发症。平均随访时间为37.2±13.8个月。两组患者复发结石或胆管炎的发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对于部分LSH患者,经LHD残端进行无T管引流的胆道探查术是安全的,短期和长期效果均令人满意。