Zairi F, Arikat A, Allaoui M, Assaker R
Department of Neurosurgery, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2013 May;74(3):131-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1330956. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is an efficient technique which can achieve a fusion rate of up to 90%. Minimally invasive approaches have become increasingly popular because they appear to minimize iatrogenic soft tissue and muscle injury. As minimally invasive TLIF gains popularity, its effectiveness compared with open TLIF has yet to be established.
A retrospective study was performed with the aim to compare long-term outcomes of patients who underwent mini-open TLIF with those who underwent open TLIF.
This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Between 2005 and 2008, 100 patients underwent TLIF for low-grade spondylolisthesis or degenerative disc disease; 60 underwent open TLIF and 40 underwent mini-open TLIF. The mean age in each group was 48 years, and there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. Data were collected perioperatively. Pain and functional disability were measured using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. In addition, the fusion was evaluated at 1 year on a computerized tomography (CT) scan.
The mean VAS improved from 7.3 to 3.8 for back pain and from 7 to 2.7 for leg pain and the ODI decreased from 60 to 30% at 2 years postoperatively. The fusion rate at 1 year was 98%. There were no statistical differences for the clinical and radiological outcomes between the groups. The mean operative time was 186 minutes in the open group and 170 minutes in the mini-open group (p < 0.05) and the mean blood loss was 486 mL in the open group and 148 mL in the mini-open group (p < 0.01).
The mini-open TLIF for symptomatic low-grade spondylolisthesis and degenerative disc disease is an effective option that achieves the same clinical and radiological outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up and reduces perioperative morbidity.
经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)是一种有效的技术,融合率可达90%。微创方法越来越受欢迎,因为它们似乎能将医源性软组织和肌肉损伤降至最低。随着微创TLIF越来越普及,其与开放TLIF相比的有效性尚未得到证实。
进行一项回顾性研究,旨在比较接受微创开放TLIF的患者与接受开放TLIF的患者的长期疗效。
这是一项对前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。2005年至2008年期间,100例患者因低度腰椎滑脱或退行性椎间盘疾病接受了TLIF;60例接受开放TLIF,40例接受微创开放TLIF。每组的平均年龄为48岁,两组之间无统计学显著差异。在围手术期收集数据。在术后3个月、6个月、1年和2年时,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)测量疼痛和功能障碍。此外,在术后1年通过计算机断层扫描(CT)评估融合情况。
术后2年,背痛的平均VAS评分从7.3改善至3.8,腿痛从7改善至2.7,ODI从60%降至30%。1年时的融合率为98%。两组之间的临床和影像学结果无统计学差异。开放组的平均手术时间为186分钟,微创开放组为170分钟(p < 0.05);开放组的平均失血量为486 mL,微创开放组为148 mL(p < 0.01)。
对于有症状的低度腰椎滑脱和退行性椎间盘疾病,微创开放TLIF是一种有效的选择,在至少2年的随访中能达到相同的临床和影像学结果,并降低围手术期发病率。