• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双重认知灵活性途径:维度变化卡片分类任务中的学习和反应冲突解决。

Dual routes to cognitive flexibility: learning and response-conflict resolution in the dimensional change card sort task.

机构信息

University of Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2013 Jul-Aug;84(4):1308-23. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12044. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1111/cdev.12044
PMID:23311677
Abstract

Cognitive control, the ability to align our actions with goals or context, is largely absent in children under four. How then are preschoolers able to tailor their behavior to best match the situation? Learning may provide an alternative route to context-sensitive responding. This study investigated this hypothesis in the Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS), a classic test of cognitive control that most under-fours fail. A training intervention based on learning theoretic principles proved highly effective: Three-year-olds who learned about DCCS rules and game contexts in a card-labeling task, subsequently transferred this knowledge to sorting in the DCCS, passing at more than 3 times the rate of controls (N = 47). This surprising finding reveals much about the nature of the developing mind.

摘要

认知控制,即根据目标或情境调整行为的能力,在四岁以下的儿童中基本缺失。那么,学龄前儿童是如何调整自己的行为以最好地适应环境的呢?学习可能提供了一种对情境敏感反应的替代途径。本研究在维度变化卡片分类任务(DCCS)中验证了这一假设,这是一个经典的认知控制测试,大多数四岁以下的儿童都无法通过。一项基于学习理论原则的训练干预措施被证明非常有效:在卡片标记任务中学习 DCCS 规则和游戏情境的三岁儿童,随后将这种知识转移到 DCCS 的分类中,通过率超过对照组的三倍(N=47)。这一令人惊讶的发现揭示了很多关于发展中思维的本质。

相似文献

1
Dual routes to cognitive flexibility: learning and response-conflict resolution in the dimensional change card sort task.双重认知灵活性途径:维度变化卡片分类任务中的学习和反应冲突解决。
Child Dev. 2013 Jul-Aug;84(4):1308-23. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12044. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
2
Improving postswitch performance in the dimensional change card-sorting task: the importance of the switch and of pretraining by redescribing the test cards.提高维度变化卡片分类任务中的切换后表现:通过重新描述测试卡片进行切换及预训练的重要性。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Dec;98(4):243-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
3
Perseveration and the status of 3-year-olds' knowledge in a card-sorting task: evidence from studies involving congruent flankers.持续注意与 3 岁儿童在卡片分类任务中的知识状态:来自涉及一致侧翼的研究的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Jan;111(1):52-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Aug 20.
4
Relations as rules: the role of attention in the Dimensional Change Card Sort task.关系即规则:注意在维度变化卡片分类任务中的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2011 Jan;47(1):50-60. doi: 10.1037/a0021025.
5
The dynamics of development on the Dimensional Change Card Sorting task.维度变化卡片分类任务的发展动态。
Dev Sci. 2011 Sep;14(5):960-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01045.x. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
6
The development of executive function in early childhood.幼儿期执行功能的发展。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2003;68(3):vii-137. doi: 10.1111/j.0037-976x.2003.00260.x.
7
Preschoolers can form abstract rule representations regardless of cognitive flexibility.学龄前儿童无论认知灵活性如何,都能形成抽象规则表征。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Aug;124:50-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.017. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
8
What visual information do children and adults consider while switching between tasks? Eye-tracking investigation of cognitive flexibility development.儿童和成人在任务切换时会考虑哪些视觉信息?认知灵活性发展的眼动追踪研究。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Jul;46(4):955-72. doi: 10.1037/a0019674.
9
Automatic shifts of attention in the Dimensional Change Card Sort task: subtle changes in task materials lead to flexible switching.维度变化卡片分类任务中的自动注意转移:任务材料的细微变化导致灵活切换。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Jan;108(1):211-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
10
Setting goals to switch between tasks: effect of cue transparency on children's cognitive flexibility.设定任务切换目标:线索透明度对儿童认知灵活性的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2009 May;45(3):782-97. doi: 10.1037/a0015409.

引用本文的文献

1
Vocabulary and Executive Functioning: A Scoping Review of the Unidirectional and Bidirectional Associations across Early Childhood.词汇与执行功能:对幼儿期单向和双向关联的范围综述
Hum Dev. 2022 Aug;66(3):167-187. doi: 10.1159/000524964. Epub 2022 May 11.
2
An exploration of error-driven learning in simple two-layer networks from a discriminative learning perspective.从判别式学习的角度探究简单两层网络中的错误驱动学习。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Oct;54(5):2221-2251. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01711-5. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
3
Order Matters! Influences of Linear Order on Linguistic Category Learning.
语序很重要!线性语序对语言范畴学习的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Nov;44(11):e12910. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12910.
4
Executive functions and components of oral reading fluency through the lens of text complexity.从文本复杂度的角度看执行功能与口语阅读流畅性的组成部分。
Read Writ. 2020 Apr;33(4):1037-1073. doi: 10.1007/s11145-020-10020-w. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
5
Of mice and men: Speech sound acquisition as discriminative learning from prediction error, not just statistical tracking.从鼠到人:语音习得是基于预测误差的辨别性学习,而非仅仅是统计追踪。
Cognition. 2020 Apr;197:104081. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104081. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
6
NDRA: A single route model of response times in the reading aloud task based on discriminative learning.NDRA:基于判别式学习的朗读任务中反应时的单一途径模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0218802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218802. eCollection 2019.
7
Are baboons learning "orthographic" representations? Probably not.狒狒正在学习“正字法”表征吗?可能并非如此。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 31;12(8):e0183876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183876. eCollection 2017.
8
Empirical Tests of a Brain-Based Model of Executive Function Development.基于大脑的执行功能发展模型的实证检验。
Child Dev. 2019 Jan;90(1):210-226. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12885. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
9
Words from spontaneous conversational speech can be recognized with human-like accuracy by an error-driven learning algorithm that discriminates between meanings straight from smart acoustic features, bypassing the phoneme as recognition unit.一种基于错误驱动的学习算法能够以类人的准确率识别出自发性对话语音中的词汇。该算法直接从智能声学特征中区分意义,绕过音素作为识别单元。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 10;12(4):e0174623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174623. eCollection 2017.
10
Discrimination in lexical decision.词汇判断中的辨别
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0171935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171935. eCollection 2017.