• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

NDRA:基于判别式学习的朗读任务中反应时的单一途径模型。

NDRA: A single route model of response times in the reading aloud task based on discriminative learning.

机构信息

Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0218802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218802. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0218802
PMID:31365531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6668775/
Abstract

We present the Naive Discriminative Reading Aloud (ndra) model. The ndra differs from existing models of response times in the reading aloud task in two ways. First, a single lexical architecture is responsible for both word and non-word naming. As such, the model differs from dual-route models, which consist of both a lexical route and a sub-lexical route that directly maps orthographic units onto phonological units. Second, the linguistic core of the ndra exclusively operates on the basis of the equilibrium equations for the well-established general human learning algorithm provided by the Rescorla-Wagner model. The model therefore does not posit language-specific processing mechanisms and avoids the problems of psychological and neurobiological implausibility associated with alternative computational implementations. We demonstrate that the single-route discriminative learning architecture of the ndra captures a wide range of effects documented in the experimental reading aloud literature and that the overall fit of the model is at least as good as that of state-of-the-art dual-route models.

摘要

我们提出了朴素判别式朗读(ndra)模型。该模型与朗读任务中现有的反应时模型在两个方面存在差异。首先,单一的词汇架构负责单词和非单词命名。因此,该模型与双通路模型不同,后者由词汇通路和直接将正字法单位映射到语音单位的亚词汇通路组成。其次,ndra 的语言核心完全基于由 Rescorla-Wagner 模型提供的经过充分验证的通用人类学习算法的平衡方程运行。因此,该模型不假设语言特有的处理机制,并避免了与替代计算实现相关的心理和神经生物学不可信的问题。我们证明,ndra 的单一通路判别式学习架构可以捕捉到实验朗读文献中记录的广泛的效应,并且该模型的整体拟合度至少与最先进的双通路模型一样好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/655b4968d153/pone.0218802.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/e6be13124104/pone.0218802.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/13a1cdd968de/pone.0218802.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/d1fdae26d91c/pone.0218802.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/070d6d829460/pone.0218802.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/313302d18c88/pone.0218802.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/85a98c3cae17/pone.0218802.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/8168d2a05e93/pone.0218802.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/42b4fff62890/pone.0218802.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/801306596ac0/pone.0218802.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/9b8087680231/pone.0218802.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/f95c36c7f243/pone.0218802.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/545d9e87b719/pone.0218802.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/a46939a79a56/pone.0218802.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/655b4968d153/pone.0218802.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/e6be13124104/pone.0218802.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/13a1cdd968de/pone.0218802.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/d1fdae26d91c/pone.0218802.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/070d6d829460/pone.0218802.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/313302d18c88/pone.0218802.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/85a98c3cae17/pone.0218802.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/8168d2a05e93/pone.0218802.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/42b4fff62890/pone.0218802.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/801306596ac0/pone.0218802.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/9b8087680231/pone.0218802.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/f95c36c7f243/pone.0218802.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/545d9e87b719/pone.0218802.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/a46939a79a56/pone.0218802.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c119/6668775/655b4968d153/pone.0218802.g014.jpg

相似文献

1
NDRA: A single route model of response times in the reading aloud task based on discriminative learning.NDRA:基于判别式学习的朗读任务中反应时的单一途径模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0218802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218802. eCollection 2019.
2
Neighborhood effects in reading aloud: new findings and new challenges for computational models.大声朗读中的邻里效应:计算模型的新发现与新挑战
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Aug;32(4):799-810. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.799.
3
Tracking the transition from sublexical to lexical processing: on the creation of orthographic and phonological lexical representations.追踪从次词汇加工到词汇加工的转变:论正字法和语音词汇表征的创建。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 May;62(5):858-67. doi: 10.1080/17470210802578385. Epub 2008 Dec 20.
4
The use and nature of grapheme coding during sub-lexical processing and lexical access.在次词汇加工和词汇通达过程中字形编码的使用与本质。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jun;71(6):1324-1339. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1318294. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
5
Developmental surface dyslexias.发育性表层失读症
Cortex. 2008 Oct;44(9):1146-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.09.005. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
6
Examining the interactivity of lexical orthographic and phonological processing.考察词汇正字法和语音处理的交互性。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2003 Dec;57(4):290-303. doi: 10.1037/h0087432.
7
Sequential effects of phonological priming in visual word recognition.语音启动在视觉单词识别中的序列效应。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Aug;16(8):585-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01579.x.
8
The use of the orthographic lexicon in reading kana words.在阅读假名单词时正字法词典的使用。
J Gen Psychol. 1990 Jul;117(3):311-23.
9
Phonological processes in reading: new evidence from acquired dyslexia.阅读中的语音加工:来自获得性阅读障碍的新证据。
Br J Psychol. 1983 May;74(Pt 2):159-80. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1983.tb01851.x.
10
DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.DRC:视觉单词识别与大声朗读的双路径级联模型。
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):204-56. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204.

引用本文的文献

1
LDL-AURIS: a computational model, grounded in error-driven learning, for the comprehension of single spoken words.LDL-AURIS:一种基于错误驱动学习的用于理解单个口语单词的计算模型。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Jul 21;38(4):509-536. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2021.1954207. eCollection 2023.
2
Jiwar: A database and calculator for word neighborhood measures in 40 languages.吉瓦尔:一个包含40种语言的词邻域度量的数据库和计算器。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Feb 19;57(3):98. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02612-7.

本文引用的文献

1
A Computational Model of the Self-Teaching Hypothesis Based on the Dual-Route Cascaded Model of Reading.基于阅读双路径级联模型的自我教学假设计算模型。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;42(3):722-770. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12571. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
2
Sidestepping the combinatorial explosion: an explanation of n-gram frequency effects based on naive discriminative learning .避开组合爆炸:基于朴素判别学习的n元语法频率效应解释
Lang Speech. 2013 Sep;56(Pt 3):329-47. doi: 10.1177/0023830913484896.
3
The widespread influence of the Rescorla-Wagner model.
广泛影响的雷斯考拉-瓦格纳模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Sep;3(3):314-21. doi: 10.3758/BF03210755.
4
Dual routes to cognitive flexibility: learning and response-conflict resolution in the dimensional change card sort task.双重认知灵活性途径:维度变化卡片分类任务中的学习和反应冲突解决。
Child Dev. 2013 Jul-Aug;84(4):1308-23. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12044. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
5
Can cognitive models explain brain activation during word and pseudoword reading? A meta-analysis of 36 neuroimaging studies.认知模型能否解释单词和伪词阅读时大脑的激活?36 项神经影像学研究的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;139(4):766-91. doi: 10.1037/a0030266. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
6
Nonword reading: comparing dual-route cascaded and connectionist dual-process models with human data.非词阅读:与人脑数据比较双重通路级联模型和联结主义双加工模型。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Oct;38(5):1268-88. doi: 10.1037/a0026703. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
7
Direct evidence for two different neural mechanisms for reading familiar and unfamiliar words: an intra-cerebral EEG study.直接证据表明阅读熟悉和不熟悉单词涉及两种不同的神经机制:一项脑内 EEG 研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Sep 20;5:101. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00101. eCollection 2011.
8
An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning.基于朴素判别学习的视觉理解中形态处理的无定形模型。
Psychol Rev. 2011 Jul;118(3):438-481. doi: 10.1037/a0023851.
9
The effects of feature-label-order and their implications for symbolic learning.特征-标签顺序的影响及其对符号学习的意义。
Cogn Sci. 2010 Aug;34(6):909-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01092.x. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
10
The probabilistic analysis of language acquisition: theoretical, computational, and experimental analysis.语言习得的概率分析:理论、计算和实验分析。
Cognition. 2011 Sep;120(3):380-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.013. Epub 2011 Mar 26.