Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J Pediatr. 2013 Jul;163(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
To determine if low-flow nasal prongs therapy with room air, compared with no treatment, facilitates weaning from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in very low birth weight (VLBW, birth weight <1500 g) infants.
VLBW infants who received respiratory support for ≥ 48 hours and who were stable on NCPAP for 24 hours were eligible for inclusion in this multicenter, randomized controlled trial. On stopping NCPAP, infants were randomized to receive 1 L/min air via nasal prongs or to spontaneous breathing in room air. The primary outcome measure was failure to wean. Secondary outcome measures included length of time to failure and change in heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and respiratory distress score.
Seventy-eight infants were randomized: 39 to nasal prongs and 39 to spontaneous breathing. The groups were similar at birth and at randomization. Sixteen infants (41%) in the nasal prongs group failed the weaning process compared with 12 infants (31%) in the spontaneous breathing group (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.56 to 4.43, P = .48). There were no significant differences between the groups in secondary outcomes.
In this study, we did not demonstrate a benefit of low-flow room air via nasal prongs to wean VLBW infants from NCPAP.
确定与不治疗相比,低流量鼻塞持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)治疗是否有助于极低出生体重(VLBW,出生体重<1500 克)婴儿从 NCPAP 撤机。
接受呼吸支持≥48 小时且 NCPAP 稳定 24 小时的 VLBW 婴儿有资格参加这项多中心随机对照试验。停止 NCPAP 后,婴儿被随机分配接受 1 L/min 空气通过鼻塞或在室内空气中自主呼吸。主要结局指标是撤机失败。次要结局指标包括撤机失败的时间、心率、呼吸频率、氧饱和度和呼吸窘迫评分的变化。
78 名婴儿被随机分配:39 名接受鼻塞,39 名接受自主呼吸。两组在出生和随机分组时相似。鼻塞组有 16 名婴儿(41%)撤机失败,而自主呼吸组有 12 名婴儿(31%)(OR 1.57,95%CI 0.56 至 4.43,P=0.48)。两组在次要结局方面无显著差异。
在这项研究中,我们没有证明通过鼻塞给予低流量室内空气对 VLBW 婴儿从 NCPAP 撤机有好处。