Boston University, Dept. of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, 635 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Phys Ther Sport. 2013 Feb;14(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 May 1.
To determine how gluteus medius (Gmed) and maximus (Gmax) activate during closed-chain functional rehabilitative exercises in those with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI).
Cohort study. Subjects performed ten repetitions of a rotational lunge and single-leg rotational squat while surface electromyography was used to collect mean muscle activity of the Gmed and Gmax.
Mean electromyography activity of the Gmed and Gmax at maximum excursion was compared between Groups and Exercises using a separate 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance design for each muscle.
University biomechanics lab.
Nine healthy (8F, 1M) and nine CAI subjects (8F, 1M) RESULTS: For Gmax activation, there was a statistically significant Group by Exercise interaction (F(3,48) = 4.84, p = 0.043). A Scheffe's post-hoc test revealed that during the rotational squat, the CAI group had significantly lower Gmax activation (51.1 ± 31.0%) than the healthy group (78.6 ± 44.8%). There were no statistically significant findings for the Gmed. In the healthy group, the Gmax produced significantly higher activation during rotational squat (78.6 ± 44.8%) compared to the rotational lunge (57.6 ± 31.9%).
Because the CAI group had significantly less Gmax activation than the healthy group during the rotational squat at the point of maximum excursion, and because the rotational squat showed significantly higher Gmax activation compared to the rotational lunge, it may be important for clinicians to implement the rotational squat during rehabilitation for those with CAI. Future prospective and intervention research involving hip musculature in those with CAI is recommended.
确定在患有和不患有慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)的人群中,进行闭合链功能性康复锻炼时,臀中肌(Gmed)和臀大肌(Gmax)的激活方式。
队列研究。受试者进行了十次旋转弓步和单腿旋转深蹲,同时使用表面肌电图来收集 Gmed 和 Gmax 的平均肌肉活动。
使用两种不同的 2 路重复测量方差设计,分别对每组和每项运动的 Gmed 和 Gmax 的最大活动幅度时的平均肌电图活动进行比较。
大学生物力学实验室。
9 名健康(8 名女性,1 名男性)和 9 名 CAI 受试者(8 名女性,1 名男性)。
对于 Gmax 的激活,存在统计学上显著的组间和运动间的交互作用(F(3,48) = 4.84,p = 0.043)。Scheffe 事后检验显示,在旋转深蹲中,CAI 组的 Gmax 激活显著低于健康组(51.1 ± 31.0%比 78.6 ± 44.8%)。对于 Gmed 没有统计学意义的发现。在健康组中,Gmax 在旋转深蹲时的激活显著高于旋转弓步(78.6 ± 44.8%比 57.6 ± 31.9%)。
由于在最大活动幅度时,CAI 组的 Gmax 激活显著低于健康组,并且旋转深蹲时的 Gmax 激活显著高于旋转弓步,因此对于临床医生来说,在 CAI 患者的康复过程中实施旋转深蹲可能很重要。建议对 CAI 患者的髋关节肌肉进行未来的前瞻性和干预性研究。