Suppr超能文献

比较慢性踝关节不稳定患者和无慢性踝关节不稳定患者在两种功能练习中臀中肌和臀大肌肌电图的差异。

A comparison of electromyography of gluteus medius and maximus in subjects with and without chronic ankle instability during two functional exercises.

机构信息

Boston University, Dept. of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, 635 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Phys Ther Sport. 2013 Feb;14(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 May 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine how gluteus medius (Gmed) and maximus (Gmax) activate during closed-chain functional rehabilitative exercises in those with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI).

DESIGN

Cohort study. Subjects performed ten repetitions of a rotational lunge and single-leg rotational squat while surface electromyography was used to collect mean muscle activity of the Gmed and Gmax.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean electromyography activity of the Gmed and Gmax at maximum excursion was compared between Groups and Exercises using a separate 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance design for each muscle.

SETTING

University biomechanics lab.

PARTICIPANTS

Nine healthy (8F, 1M) and nine CAI subjects (8F, 1M) RESULTS: For Gmax activation, there was a statistically significant Group by Exercise interaction (F(3,48) = 4.84, p = 0.043). A Scheffe's post-hoc test revealed that during the rotational squat, the CAI group had significantly lower Gmax activation (51.1 ± 31.0%) than the healthy group (78.6 ± 44.8%). There were no statistically significant findings for the Gmed. In the healthy group, the Gmax produced significantly higher activation during rotational squat (78.6 ± 44.8%) compared to the rotational lunge (57.6 ± 31.9%).

CONCLUSION

Because the CAI group had significantly less Gmax activation than the healthy group during the rotational squat at the point of maximum excursion, and because the rotational squat showed significantly higher Gmax activation compared to the rotational lunge, it may be important for clinicians to implement the rotational squat during rehabilitation for those with CAI. Future prospective and intervention research involving hip musculature in those with CAI is recommended.

摘要

目的

确定在患有和不患有慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)的人群中,进行闭合链功能性康复锻炼时,臀中肌(Gmed)和臀大肌(Gmax)的激活方式。

设计

队列研究。受试者进行了十次旋转弓步和单腿旋转深蹲,同时使用表面肌电图来收集 Gmed 和 Gmax 的平均肌肉活动。

主要观察指标

使用两种不同的 2 路重复测量方差设计,分别对每组和每项运动的 Gmed 和 Gmax 的最大活动幅度时的平均肌电图活动进行比较。

设置

大学生物力学实验室。

参与者

9 名健康(8 名女性,1 名男性)和 9 名 CAI 受试者(8 名女性,1 名男性)。

结果

对于 Gmax 的激活,存在统计学上显著的组间和运动间的交互作用(F(3,48) = 4.84,p = 0.043)。Scheffe 事后检验显示,在旋转深蹲中,CAI 组的 Gmax 激活显著低于健康组(51.1 ± 31.0%比 78.6 ± 44.8%)。对于 Gmed 没有统计学意义的发现。在健康组中,Gmax 在旋转深蹲时的激活显著高于旋转弓步(78.6 ± 44.8%比 57.6 ± 31.9%)。

结论

由于在最大活动幅度时,CAI 组的 Gmax 激活显著低于健康组,并且旋转深蹲时的 Gmax 激活显著高于旋转弓步,因此对于临床医生来说,在 CAI 患者的康复过程中实施旋转深蹲可能很重要。建议对 CAI 患者的髋关节肌肉进行未来的前瞻性和干预性研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验