Suppr超能文献

骑行时鞍座前后移动对膝关节力的影响。

Effects of moving forward or backward on the saddle on knee joint forces during cycling.

机构信息

Sport Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Phys Ther Sport. 2013 Feb;14(1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Apr 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of cycling at preferred, forward and backward saddle positions on patellofemoral compressive and tibiofemoral compressive and shear forces.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

An incremental cycling test to exhaustion determined cyclists' maximal aerobic workload and second ventilatory threshold. In a second session, 1-min cycling trial at maximal aerobic workload then three 2-min trials at second ventilatory threshold workload at preferred, forward and backward saddle positions. Right pedal force via instrumented pedals, lower limb joint kinematics via video and inverse dynamics were used to calculate knee joint forces.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-one competitive cyclists (28 ± 7 years).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patellofemoral compressive, tibiofemoral compressive and shear forces, and knee flexion angle.

RESULTS

Changes to forward/backward saddle positions did not substantially affect compressive forces for patellofemoral (1-4%) or tibiofemoral (1-3%) joints. Tibiofemoral shear force increased in backward compared with preferred (19%) or forward (26%) saddle positions. Knee flexion angle at 3 o'clock (22%) and 6 o'clock crank positions (36%) increased at the forward compared to the backward saddle position.

CONCLUSIONS

Small increases in knee flexion angle (5-6°) explained trivial differences in patellofemoral and tibiofemoral compressive forces. Tibiofemoral shear force may be more sensitive to changes in knee joint angle compared to other knee force components.

摘要

目的

研究在 Preferred(理想)、Forward(前向)和 Backward(后向)鞍座位置骑行时,对髌股关节压缩力、胫股关节压缩力和剪切力的影响。

设计

横断面研究。

设置

递增至力竭的踏车测试确定了自行车运动员的最大有氧工作负荷和第二呼吸阈。在第二个测试会话中,以最大有氧工作负荷进行 1 分钟的踏车试验,然后在 Preferred(理想)、Forward(前向)和 Backward(后向)鞍座位置的第二呼吸阈工作负荷下进行三次 2 分钟的试验。通过带仪器的脚踏板测量右踏板力,通过视频和反向动力学测量下肢关节运动学,以计算膝关节力。

参与者

21 名竞技自行车运动员(28±7 岁)。

主要观察指标

髌股关节压缩力、胫股关节压缩力和剪切力,以及膝关节屈曲角度。

结果

鞍座前后位置的改变对髌股关节(1-4%)或胫股关节(1-3%)的压缩力没有显著影响。与 Preferred(理想)或 Forward(前向)鞍座位置相比,Backward(后向)鞍座位置时胫股关节剪切力增加。与后向鞍座位置相比,前向鞍座位置时 3 点钟(22%)和 6 点钟曲柄位置(36%)的膝关节屈曲角度增加。

结论

膝关节屈曲角度增加 5-6°,可解释髌股和胫股压缩力的微小差异。与其他膝关节力分量相比,胫股关节剪切力可能对膝关节角度的变化更敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验