• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

α-粒子与γ射线联合辐射诱导人淋巴母细胞微核的剂量反应。

Dose response of micronuclei induced by combination radiation of α-particles and γ-rays in human lymphoblast cells.

机构信息

Institute of Radiation Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Mutat Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;741-742:51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2012.12.007
PMID:23313503
Abstract

Combination radiation is a real situation of both nuclear accident exposure and space radiation environment, but its biological dosimetry is still not established. This study investigated the dose-response of micronuclei (MN) induction in lymphocyte by irradiating HMy2.CIR lymphoblast cells with α-particles, γ-rays, and their combinations. Results showed that the dose-response of MN induced by γ-rays was well-fitted with the linear-quadratic model. But for α-particle irradiation, the MN induction had a biphasic phenomenon containing a low dose hypersensitivity characteristic and its dose response could be well-stimulated with a state vector model where radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE) was involved. For the combination exposure, the dose response of MN was similar to that of α-irradiation. However, the yield of MN was closely related to the sequence of irradiations. When the cells were irradiated with α-particles at first and then γ-rays, a synergistic effect of MN induction was observed. But when the cells were irradiated with γ-rays followed by α-particles, an antagonistic effect of MN was observed in the low dose range although this combination radiation also yielded a synergistic effect at high doses. When the interval between two irradiations was extended to 4h, a cross-adaptive response against the other irradiation was induced by a low dose of γ-rays but not α-particles.

摘要

联合辐射是核事故照射和空间辐射环境的真实情况,但目前其生物剂量测定尚未建立。本研究通过用α-粒子、γ射线及其组合照射 HMy2.CIR 淋巴母细胞,研究了淋巴细胞微核(MN)诱导的剂量反应。结果表明,γ射线诱导的 MN 剂量反应与线性二次模型拟合良好。但对于α粒子照射,MN 诱导具有双相现象,包含低剂量超敏特征,其剂量反应可以通过涉及辐射诱导旁观者效应(RIBE)的状态向量模型很好地刺激。对于联合暴露,MN 的剂量反应与α-照射相似。然而,MN 的产量与照射的顺序密切相关。当细胞首先用α-粒子照射,然后用γ射线照射时,观察到 MN 诱导的协同效应。但是,当细胞先用γ射线照射,然后用α-粒子照射时,在低剂量范围内观察到 MN 的拮抗效应,尽管这种组合辐射在高剂量下也产生协同效应。当两次照射之间的间隔延长至 4 小时时,低剂量γ射线诱导对另一次照射的交叉适应性反应,但α-粒子则没有。

相似文献

1
Dose response of micronuclei induced by combination radiation of α-particles and γ-rays in human lymphoblast cells.α-粒子与γ射线联合辐射诱导人淋巴母细胞微核的剂量反应。
Mutat Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;741-742:51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
2
Role of the MAPK pathway in the observed bystander effect in lymphocytes co-cultured with macrophages irradiated with γ-rays or carbon ions.丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)信号通路在与经γ射线或碳离子辐照的巨噬细胞共培养的淋巴细胞中所观察到的旁观者效应中的作用。
Life Sci. 2015 Apr 15;127:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2015.02.017. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
3
Measurement of micronuclei by cytokinesis-block method in human, cattle, goat, pig, rabbit, chicken and fish peripheral blood lymphocytes irradiated in vitro with gamma radiation.采用胞质分裂阻滞法对经体外γ射线照射的人、牛、山羊、猪、兔、鸡和鱼外周血淋巴细胞中的微核进行测量。
In Vivo. 2003 Sep-Oct;17(5):433-8.
4
[A dose-effect relationship study for the frequency of binuclear cells with micronuclei in a human lymphocyte culture after gamma irradiation].[γ射线照射后人淋巴细胞培养中双核微核细胞频率的剂量效应关系研究]
Radiobiologiia. 1991 Jan-Feb;31(1):71-6.
5
Elevated sodium chloride concentrations enhance the bystander effects induced by low dose alpha-particle irradiation.升高的氯化钠浓度会增强低剂量α粒子辐射诱导的旁观者效应。
Mutat Res. 2007 Nov 1;624(1-2):124-31. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.04.010. Epub 2007 May 5.
6
Transcriptional responses in irradiated and bystander fibroblasts after low dose α-particle radiation.低剂量 α 粒子辐射后照射和旁观者成纤维细胞中的转录反应。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2012 Oct;88(10):713-9. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2012.704657. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
7
Clastogenic effects of defined numbers of 3.2 MeV alpha particles on individual CHO-K1 cells.特定数量的3.2兆电子伏特α粒子对单个中国仓鼠卵巢细胞(CHO-K1)的致断裂效应。
Radiat Res. 1996 May;145(5):568-74.
8
Micronucleus induction in human lymphocytes: comparative effects of X rays, alpha particles, beta particles and neutrons and implications for biological dosimetry.人淋巴细胞中的微核诱导:X射线、α粒子、β粒子和中子的比较效应及其对生物剂量测定的意义。
Radiat Res. 1996 May;145(5):575-85.
9
mBAND analysis of chromosome aberrations in lymphocytes exposed in vitro to alpha-particles and gamma-rays.体外暴露于α粒子和γ射线的淋巴细胞染色体畸变的mBAND分析。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2008 Jun;84(6):447-53. doi: 10.1080/09553000802078412.
10
Micronuclei in human peripheral blood lymphocytes exposed to mixed beams of X-rays and alpha particles.暴露于X射线和α粒子混合束下的人类外周血淋巴细胞中的微核。
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2012 Aug;51(3):283-93. doi: 10.1007/s00411-012-0417-x. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
DNA Damage by Radiopharmaceuticals and Mechanisms of Cellular Repair.放射性药物所致DNA损伤及细胞修复机制
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Dec 12;15(12):2761. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15122761.
2
The Radiobiology of Radiopharmaceuticals.放射性药物的放射生物学。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jan;31(1):20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.07.002.
3
CLIC4 regulates radioresistance of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by iNOS after γ-rays but not carbon ions irradiation.CLIC4通过诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)调节鼻咽癌在γ射线照射后的辐射抗性,但对碳离子照射无此作用。
Am J Cancer Res. 2020 May 1;10(5):1400-1415. eCollection 2020.
4
Bystander autophagy mediated by radiation-induced exosomal miR-7-5p in non-targeted human bronchial epithelial cells.辐射诱导的外泌体miR-7-5p在非靶向人支气管上皮细胞中介导的旁观者自噬。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 15;6:30165. doi: 10.1038/srep30165.
5
New models for prediction of micronuclei formation in nuclear medicine department workers.核医学科工作人员微核形成预测的新模型
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015 Jul 25;10:25. doi: 10.1186/s12995-015-0066-5. eCollection 2015.
6
Up-regulation of Bcl-2 expression in cultured human lymphocytes after exposure to low doses of gamma radiation.低剂量γ射线照射后培养的人淋巴细胞中Bcl-2表达上调。
J Med Phys. 2015 Jan-Mar;40(1):38-44. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.152249.