• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用纸质问卷评估孕妇用药史的回顾性报告:荷兰的验证性研究。

Maternal recall of prescription medication use during pregnancy using a paper-based questionnaire: a validation study in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and HTA, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2013 Jan;36(1):43-54. doi: 10.1007/s40264-012-0004-8.

DOI:10.1007/s40264-012-0004-8
PMID:23315295
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In case-control studies that assess associations between medication use and birth defects, detailed information on type of medication and timing of use is essential to prevent misclassification. However, data on the accuracy of recall of medication use during pregnancy are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to validate a self-administered questionnaire to assess prescription medication use in the 3 months before and during pregnancy.

METHODS

This validation study was embedded in Eurocat Northern Netherlands, a population-based birth defects registry that covers 10% of all births in The Netherlands. The questionnaire was validated among 560 mothers of infants with major birth defects registered from 1 January 2009 through 30 June 2010 by comparing it with a reference standard consisting of pharmacy data which were checked for compliance by maternal interviews. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to quantify validity for any prescription medication use, groups of medications and individual medications. In addition, we determined whether maternal characteristics influenced disagreement between the questionnaire and the reference standard using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The sensitivity for any prescription medication use was 0.57, ranging between 0.07 (dermatological corticosteroids) and 0.83 (antihypertensives) for medication groups, and between 0.00 (naproxen) and 0.73 (salbutamol) for individual medications. Overall, specificity was high (0.93-1.00). Smoking during pregnancy and completing the questionnaire>2 years after delivery were associated with increased disagreement between the questionnaire for prescription medication use and the reference standard.

CONCLUSIONS

The validity of the self-administered questionnaire for prescription medication use during pregnancy was moderate to poor for most medications and disagreement differed by some maternal characteristics. As many epidemiological studies use similar questionnaires to assess medication use these studies may need additional data sources such as pharmacy records or prescription databases for medication use next to self-reported methods. Also, previous knowledge on the effect of questionnaire design should be taken into account.

摘要

背景

在评估药物使用与出生缺陷之间关联的病例对照研究中,详细的药物类型和使用时间信息对于防止分类错误至关重要。然而,关于怀孕期间药物使用回忆准确性的数据却很少。

目的

本研究旨在验证一种自我管理的问卷,以评估怀孕前 3 个月和怀孕期间的处方药使用情况。

方法

这项验证研究嵌入在 Eurocat 荷兰北部,这是一个基于人群的出生缺陷登记处,覆盖荷兰所有出生人口的 10%。该问卷在 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 6 月 30 日期间登记的 560 名患有重大出生缺陷的婴儿的母亲中进行了验证,方法是将其与参考标准进行比较,参考标准包括药房数据,这些数据通过母亲访谈进行了合规性检查。计算了敏感性和特异性,以量化任何处方药使用、药物组和个别药物的有效性。此外,我们还使用逻辑回归分析确定了母亲特征是否会影响问卷与参考标准之间的差异。

结果

任何处方药使用的敏感性为 0.57,药物组的范围为 0.07(皮肤科皮质类固醇)至 0.83(抗高血压药),个别药物的范围为 0.00(萘普生)至 0.73(沙丁胺醇)。总体而言,特异性很高(0.93-1.00)。怀孕期间吸烟和在分娩后>2 年完成问卷与问卷中处方药物使用与参考标准之间的差异增加有关。

结论

对于大多数药物,自我管理的怀孕期间处方药使用问卷的有效性为中等至较差,并且差异因一些母亲特征而异。由于许多流行病学研究使用类似的问卷来评估药物使用情况,因此这些研究可能需要额外的数据来源,例如药房记录或处方数据库,以补充自我报告的方法。此外,还应考虑问卷设计效果的先前知识。

相似文献

1
Maternal recall of prescription medication use during pregnancy using a paper-based questionnaire: a validation study in the Netherlands.使用纸质问卷评估孕妇用药史的回顾性报告:荷兰的验证性研究。
Drug Saf. 2013 Jan;36(1):43-54. doi: 10.1007/s40264-012-0004-8.
2
Agreement between maternal report and medical records on use of medications during early pregnancy in New York.纽约孕妇在孕早期用药的母亲报告与医疗记录之间的一致性。
Birth Defects Res. 2023 Mar 1;115(4):498-509. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2151. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
3
Actual Use of Medications Prescribed During Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Data from a Population-Based Congenital Anomaly Registry.孕期开具药物的实际使用情况:一项基于人群的先天性异常登记处数据的横断面研究
Drug Saf. 2015 Aug;38(8):737-47. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0302-z.
4
Agreement between paternal self-reported medication use and records from a national prescription database.父亲自我报告的用药情况与国家处方数据库记录之间的一致性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):413-421. doi: 10.1002/pds.4411. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
5
Validation of maternal recall of early pregnancy medication exposure using prospective diary data.使用前瞻性日记数据验证母亲对孕早期药物暴露的回忆。
Ann Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;27(2):135-139.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
6
Predictors of recall certainty of dates of analgesic medication use in pregnancy.预测妊娠期间镇痛药使用日期的回忆准确性的因素。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Jan;22(1):25-32. doi: 10.1002/pds.3300. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
7
Agreement between self-report and prescription data in medical records for pregnant women.孕妇医疗记录中自我报告与处方数据之间的一致性。
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012 Mar;94(3):153-61. doi: 10.1002/bdra.22888. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
8
Predictors of the use of medications before and during pregnancy.预测妊娠前后用药的因素。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Jun;35(3):408-16. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9750-7. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
9
Self-reported medication use validated through record linkage to national prescribing data.通过与国家处方数据的记录链接验证自我报告的药物使用情况。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;94:132-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
10
Agreement between self-reported and registry-based use of sleep medications and tranquilizers.自我报告和基于登记的睡眠药物和镇静剂使用情况之间的一致性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Oct;28(10):1336-1343. doi: 10.1002/pds.4854. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Impact of Exposure Misclassification in Case-Control Studies of Self-Reported Medication Use.评估自我报告用药情况的病例对照研究中暴露错误分类的影响。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 16. doi: 10.1111/ppe.13161.
2
Social determinants of antidepressant continuation during pregnancy in the USA: findings from the ABCD cohort study.美国孕期抗抑郁药持续使用的社会决定因素:ABCD队列研究的结果
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2024 Dec;27(6):1011-1018. doi: 10.1007/s00737-024-01470-0. Epub 2024 May 14.
3
Patterns of Prescription Medication Use during the First Trimester of Pregnancy in the United States, 1997-2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolving knowledge of the teratogenicity of medications in human pregnancy.在人类妊娠中药物致畸性的知识不断发展。
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011 Aug 15;157C(3):175-82. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30313. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
2
How do we know if an exposure is actually teratogenic in humans?我们如何知道某种暴露在人类身上是否真的具有致畸性?
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011 Aug 15;157C(3):170-4. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30302. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
3
Accurate reporting of expected delivery date by mothers 9 months after birth.产妇产后 9 个月准确报告预期分娩日期。
美国 1997-2018 年妊娠早期处方药使用模式。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Oct;114(4):836-844. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2981. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
4
Prenatal Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Exposure, Depression, and Brain Morphology in Middle Childhood: Results From the ABCD Study.儿童中期的产前血清素再摄取抑制剂暴露、抑郁与脑形态:青少年大脑认知发展研究(ABCD研究)的结果
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2022 Feb 26;3(2):243-254. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.02.005. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Maternal infections and medications in pregnancy: how does self-report compare to medical records in childhood cancer case-control studies?孕妇感染和用药:在儿童癌症病例对照研究中,自我报告与医疗记录相比如何?
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Aug 2;52(4):1187-1196. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyad019.
6
Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors - Validity of Self-Report versus Plasma Concentrations and Pharmacy Dispensations - A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的使用——自我报告与血浆浓度及药房配药情况的有效性——挪威女性与癌症研究的横断面分析
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jun 30;14:815-826. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S366760. eCollection 2022.
7
Prescribed opioid analgesics in early pregnancy and the risk of congenital anomalies: a population-based cohort study.早孕期处方类阿片类镇痛药与先天畸形风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
CMAJ. 2022 Feb 7;194(5):E152-E162. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.211215.
8
Longitudinal Methods for Modeling Exposures in Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies in Pregnancy.孕期药物流行病学研究中暴露建模的纵向方法。
Epidemiol Rev. 2022 Jan 14;43(1):130-146. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxab002.
9
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Prenatal Supplement and Medication Use in Low-Risk Pregnant Women.低危孕妇产前补充剂和药物使用的种族/民族差异。
Am J Perinatol. 2022 Apr;39(6):623-632. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1717097. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
10
Maternal hypertensive disorders and subtypes of hypospadias: A Dutch case-control study.母亲高血压疾病与尿道下裂亚型:荷兰病例对照研究。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;34(6):687-695. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12683. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
4
Prenatal or early-life exposure to antibiotics and risk of childhood asthma: a systematic review.产前或生命早期接触抗生素与儿童哮喘风险:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2011 Jun;127(6):1125-38. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2092. Epub 2011 May 23.
5
Internet use in pregnancy informs women's decision making: a web-based survey.孕期上网会影响女性的决策:一项基于网络的调查。
Birth. 2010 Jun;37(2):106-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00390.x.
6
Antihypertensive treatment during pregnancy and functional development at primary school age in a historical cohort study.妊娠期间的降压治疗与历史队列研究中儿童小学年龄时的功能发育。
BJOG. 2010 Aug;117(9):1080-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02568.x. Epub 2010 May 19.
7
Medical record validation of maternally reported history of preeclampsia.产妇报告的子痫前期病史的病历验证。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):932-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.10.010. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
8
Teratogenic mechanisms of medical drugs.药物的致畸机制。
Hum Reprod Update. 2010 Jul-Aug;16(4):378-94. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp052. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
9
Questionnaire design and the recall of pharmacological treatments: a systematic review.问卷设计与药物治疗的回顾:一项系统综述
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Mar;18(3):175-87. doi: 10.1002/pds.1703.
10
Perinatal factors reported by mothers: do they agree with medical records?母亲报告的围产期因素:与病历记录是否一致?
Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(8):557-64. doi: 10.1007/s10654-008-9268-9. Epub 2008 Jun 17.