Suppr超能文献

兰索拉唑 30mg 与埃索美拉唑 40mg 治疗糜烂性食管炎的疗效等效性证据。

Evidence for therapeutic equivalence of lansoprazole 30mg and esomeprazole 40mg in the treatment of erosive oesophagitis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Medical School, 676 N. St Clair Avenue, Suite 880, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2002;22(2):99-109. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200222020-00004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of lansoprazole 30mg once daily and esomeprazole 40mg once daily on healing and symptom relief in patients with erosive oesophagitis.

DESIGN

Phase IV, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, multicentre study.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

284 patients with endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis (grade ≥2).

METHODS

Patients were randomised to treatment with lansoprazole or esomeprazole. The primary efficacy endpoint was the healing of erosive oesophagitis (defined as grade 0 or 1) at week 8. Healing rates at week 4 and the percentages of patients reporting no daytime or night-time heartburn after 1 day, 3 days and 1 week of treatment, as well as the rate of healing or improvement of oesophagitis by two grades, were also analysed.

RESULTS

Healing rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) at week 8 were 91.4% (85.4, 95.5%) for lansoprazole 30mg once daily and 89.1% (82.7, 93.8%) for esomeprazole 40mg once daily, respectively. For any baseline grade, greater than 90% of lansoprazole-treated and 81% of esomeprazole-treated patients exhibited healing or improvement of erosive oesophagitis by two grades from baseline to week 8. Healing rates at week 4 were also comparable: 77.0% (95% CI 69.1, 83.7%) for lansoprazole 30mg and 78.3% (95% CI 70.4, 84.8%) for esomeprazole 40mg. The percentages of heartburn-free patients after 1 day, 3 days and 1 week of treatment were slightly higher for lansoprazole compared with esomeprazole, although the differences did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

In erosive oesophagitis, lansoprazole 30mg once daily and esomeprazole 40mg once daily are equally effective in healing erosions and relieving heartburn.

摘要

目的

比较兰索拉唑 30mg 每日一次和埃索美拉唑 40mg 每日一次对糜烂性食管炎患者的愈合和症状缓解作用。

设计

IV 期、随机、双盲、活性对照、多中心研究。

患者和参与者

284 例内镜证实的糜烂性食管炎(等级≥2)患者。

方法

患者随机分为兰索拉唑或埃索美拉唑治疗组。主要疗效终点为 8 周时糜烂性食管炎的愈合(定义为等级 0 或 1)。还分析了 4 周时的愈合率以及治疗后 1 天、3 天和 1 周报告无日间或夜间烧心的患者百分比,以及食管炎愈合或改善两个等级的发生率。

结果

兰索拉唑 30mg 每日一次组的愈合率和 95%置信区间(CI)为 91.4%(85.4,95.5%),埃索美拉唑 40mg 每日一次组为 89.1%(82.7,93.8%)。对于任何基线等级,大于 90%的兰索拉唑治疗患者和 81%的埃索美拉唑治疗患者在第 8 周时表现出食管炎愈合或改善两个等级。第 4 周的愈合率也相当:兰索拉唑 30mg 组为 77.0%(95%CI 69.1,83.7%),埃索美拉唑 40mg 组为 78.3%(95%CI 70.4,84.8%)。与埃索美拉唑相比,兰索拉唑治疗后 1 天、3 天和 1 周的无烧心患者比例略高,但差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。两种治疗均耐受良好。

结论

在糜烂性食管炎中,兰索拉唑 30mg 每日一次和埃索美拉唑 40mg 每日一次在愈合糜烂和缓解烧心方面同样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验