Robinson Malcolm, Horn John
Department of Medicine, Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Drugs. 2003;63(24):2739-54. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363240-00004.
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) [omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole and esomeprazole] are widely utilised for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, as well as other acid-related disorders. All PPIs suppress gastric acid secretion by blocking the gastric acid pump, H(+)/K(+)-adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase), but the physicochemical properties of these drugs result in variations in the degree of acid suppression, as well as the speed of onset of acid inhibition. Such differences may impact on the clinical performance of PPIs, and this manuscript discusses data that may help clinicians choose between the available PPIs for specific clinical situations and indications. The characteristics of PPIs that have been developed subsequent to omeprazole offer several advantages over this prototype PPI, particularly with respect to the onset of acid suppression and reduced potential for inter-individual pharmacokinetic variation and drug interactions. Newer agents inhibit H(+)/K(+)-ATPase more rapidly than omeprazole and emerging clinical data support potential clinical benefits resulting from this pharmacological property. Although key pharmacokinetic parameters (time to maximum plasma concentration and elimination half-life) do not differ significantly among PPIs, differences in the hepatic metabolism of these drugs can produce inter-patient variability in acid suppression, in the potential for pharmacokinetic drug interactions and, quite possibly, in clinical efficacy. All PPIs undergo significant hepatic metabolism. Because there is no direct toxicity from PPIs, there is minimal risk from the administration of any of them - even to patients with significant renal or hepatic impairment. However, there are significant genetic polymorphisms for one of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes involved in PPI metabolism (CYP2C19), and this polymorphism has been shown to substantially increase plasma levels of omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole, but not those of rabeprazole. Hepatic metabolism is also a key determinant of the potential for a given drug to be involved in clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Omeprazole has the highest risk for such interactions among PPIs, and rabeprazole and pantoprazole appear to have the lowest risk.Thus, whereas all PPIs have been shown to be generally effective and safely used for the treatment of acid-mediated disorders, there are chemical, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences among these drugs that may make certain ones more, or less, suitable for treating different patient subgroups. Of course, the absolute magnitude of risk from any PPI in terms of drug-drug interactions is probably low - excepting interactions occurring as class effects related to acid suppression (e.g. increased digoxin absorption or inability to absorb ketoconazole).
质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)[奥美拉唑、兰索拉唑、泮托拉唑、雷贝拉唑和埃索美拉唑]被广泛用于治疗胃食管反流病以及其他与酸相关的疾病。所有PPIs均通过阻断胃酸泵H(+)/K(+)-三磷酸腺苷酶(ATP酶)来抑制胃酸分泌,但这些药物的物理化学性质导致酸抑制程度以及酸抑制起效速度存在差异。这些差异可能会影响PPIs的临床疗效,本文讨论了一些数据,这些数据可能有助于临床医生针对特定临床情况和适应证在现有PPIs之间做出选择。在奥美拉唑之后开发的PPIs的特性相对于这种原型PPI具有若干优势,特别是在酸抑制起效方面以及个体间药代动力学差异和药物相互作用的可能性降低方面。新型药物比奥美拉唑更迅速地抑制H(+)/K(+)-ATP酶,新出现的临床数据支持了这种药理学特性带来的潜在临床益处。尽管关键药代动力学参数(达最大血浆浓度时间和消除半衰期)在PPIs之间无显著差异,但这些药物肝脏代谢的差异可导致患者间酸抑制、药代动力学药物相互作用可能性以及很可能在临床疗效方面出现变异性。所有PPIs均经历显著的肝脏代谢。由于PPIs无直接毒性,使用任何一种PPIs的风险都极小——即使是对有严重肾或肝功能损害的患者。然而,参与PPI代谢的一种细胞色素P450(CYP)同工酶(CYP2C19)存在显著的基因多态性,且已表明这种多态性可大幅提高奥美拉唑、兰索拉唑和泮托拉唑的血浆水平,但不影响雷贝拉唑的血浆水平。肝脏代谢也是某种药物参与具有临床意义的药代动力学药物相互作用可能性的关键决定因素。在PPIs中,奥美拉唑发生此类相互作用的风险最高,而雷贝拉唑和泮托拉唑的风险似乎最低。因此,尽管所有PPIs已被证明一般可有效且安全地用于治疗酸介导的疾病,但这些药物在化学、药效学和药代动力学方面存在差异,这可能使某些药物更适合或不太适合治疗不同的患者亚组。当然,就药物相互作用而言,任何一种PPI的绝对风险程度可能较低——不包括作为与酸抑制相关的类效应而发生的相互作用(例如地高辛吸收增加或酮康唑吸收不良)。