• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量临床前生物伦理学课程中的认知结果。

Measuring cognitive outcomes in a pre-clinical bioethics course.

机构信息

Department of Community Health, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, 290J White Hall, Dayton, OH 45435-0001 USA.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2012 May;1(2):92-7. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0014-3. Epub 2012 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1007/s40037-012-0014-3
PMID:23316464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3540384/
Abstract

Medical schools universally accept the idea that bioethics courses are essential components of education, but few studies which measure outcomes (i.e., knowledge or retention) have demonstrated their educational value in the literature. The goal of this study was to examine whether core concepts of a pre-clinical bioethics course were learned and retained. Over the course of 2 years, a pre-test comprising 25 multiple-choice questions was administered to two classes (2008-2010) of first-year medical students prior to the start of a 15-week ethics course, and an identical post-test was administered at the end of the course. A total of 189 students participated. Paired t tests showed a significant difference between pre-test scores and post-test scores. The pre-test average score was 69.8 %, and the post-test average was 82.6 %, an increase of 12.9 % after the ethics course. The pre- and post-test results also suggested a shift in difficulty level of the questions, with students finding identical questions easier after the intervention. Given the increase in post-test scores after the 15-week intervention, the study suggests that core concepts in medical ethics were learned and retained. These results demonstrate that an introductory bioethics course can improve short-term outcomes in knowledge and comprehension, and should provide impetus to educators to demonstrate improved educational outcomes in ethics at higher levels of B.S. Bloom's Taxonomy of Learning.

摘要

医学院普遍认为,生物伦理学课程是教育的重要组成部分,但在文献中,很少有研究测量其教育价值(即知识或保留)。本研究的目的是检验临床前生物伦理学课程的核心概念是否被学习和保留。在 2 年的时间里,在一门为期 15 周的伦理学课程开始之前,向两个一年级医学生班级(2008-2010 年)发放了一份包含 25 个多项选择题的前测,并且在课程结束时发放了相同的后测。共有 189 名学生参加。配对 t 检验显示前测分数和后测分数之间存在显著差异。前测平均得分为 69.8%,后测平均得分为 82.6%,在伦理学课程后增加了 12.9%。前测和后测结果还表明问题难度水平有所变化,学生在干预后发现相同的问题更容易。鉴于 15 周干预后后测分数的增加,研究表明医学伦理学的核心概念得到了学习和保留。这些结果表明,入门生物伦理学课程可以提高知识和理解方面的短期学习效果,并且应该促使教育工作者在更高层次的 B.S.布鲁姆教育目标分类学中展示伦理教育的改进成果。

相似文献

1
Measuring cognitive outcomes in a pre-clinical bioethics course.测量临床前生物伦理学课程中的认知结果。
Perspect Med Educ. 2012 May;1(2):92-7. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0014-3. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
2
Role of comprehension on performance at higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy: Findings from assessments of healthcare professional students.布卢姆认知目标分类学高阶水平表现与理解能力的关系:对医疗专业学生评估的研究结果。
Anat Sci Educ. 2018 Sep;11(5):433-444. doi: 10.1002/ase.1768. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
3
Utilizing Bloom's taxonomy to design a substance use disorders course for health professions students.利用布鲁姆的教育目标分类法为健康专业学生设计一门物质使用障碍课程。
Subst Abus. 2018;39(3):348-353. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2018.1436634. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
4
Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: Lessons from a graduate histology course.攀登布鲁姆教育目标分类学金字塔:研究生组织学课程的经验教训。
Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Sep;10(5):456-464. doi: 10.1002/ase.1685. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
5
Medical Students' Exposure to Ethics Conflicts in Clinical Training: Implications for Timing UME Bioethics Education.医学生在临床培训中面临的伦理冲突:对本科医学教育阶段生物伦理学教育时机的启示
HEC Forum. 2020 Jun;32(2):85-97. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09412-w.
6
A learning activity to introduce undergraduate students to bioethics in human clinical research: a case study.一项向本科生介绍人类临床研究中的生物伦理学的学习活动:一个案例研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Dec;9(5):56-63. doi: 10.1177/1556264614557238.
7
An analysis of verbs used in the course outcomes of outcome-based integrated courses at a medical school based on the taxonomy of educational objectives.基于教育目标分类法对一所医学院基于成果的综合课程的课程成果中使用的动词进行的分析。
Korean J Med Educ. 2019 Sep;31(3):261-269. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2019.136. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
8
Redesigning a course to help students achieve higher-order cognitive thinking skills: from goals and mechanics to student outcomes.重新设计一门课程以帮助学生培养高阶认知思维技能:从目标、机制到学生成果。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2017 Jun 1;41(2):194-202. doi: 10.1152/advan.00102.2016.
9
Association Between Dental Student-Developed Exam Questions and Learning at Higher Cognitive Levels.牙科学生编写的考试题目与更高认知水平学习之间的关联
J Dent Educ. 2015 Nov;79(11):1295-304.
10
Comparison of Lecture-Based Learning vs Discussion-Based Learning in Undergraduate Medical Students.本科医学生基于讲座的学习与基于讨论的学习之比较
J Surg Educ. 2016 Mar-Apr;73(2):250-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.09.016. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining how Ethics in Relation to Health Technology is Described in the Research Literature: Scoping Review.研究文献中关于健康技术相关伦理的描述方式:范围综述
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Aug 15;11(2):e38745. doi: 10.2196/38745.
2
Meeting the challenge of teaching bioethics: a successful residency curricula utilizing Team-Based Learning.迎接生物伦理学教学的挑战:成功利用团队为基础的学习的住院医师课程
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):359-368. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.2013523.
3
Team-Based Learning in Bioethics Education: Creating a Successful Curriculum for Residents in an Era of "Curricular Squeeze".生物伦理学教育中的基于团队的学习:在“课程压缩”时代为住院医师创建成功的课程
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Nov 7;30(1):649-658. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00836-9. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
PME aiming for quality, originality and peer recognition.PME追求质量、原创性和同行认可。
Perspect Med Educ. 2012 May;1(2):53-5. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0015-2. Epub 2012 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Biology in bloom: implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology.绽放中的生物学:运用布鲁姆分类法提升生物学课程中的学生学习效果
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008 Winter;7(4):368-81. doi: 10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024.
2
How can we know that ethics education produces ethical doctors?我们如何才能知道道德教育能培养出有道德的医生呢?
Med Teach. 2007 Jun;29(5):431-6. doi: 10.1080/01421590701504077.
3
Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.终身学习的教育技巧:为继续医学教育活动和自我评估模块编写多项选择题。
Radiographics. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2):543-51. doi: 10.1148/rg.262055145.
4
Medical ethics education: where are we? Where should we be going? A review.医学伦理教育:我们现状如何?我们应何去何从?一篇综述。
Acad Med. 2005 Dec;80(12):1143-52. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200512000-00020.
5
A survey of medical ethics education at U.S. and Canadian medical schools.美国和加拿大医学院校医学伦理教育调查。
Acad Med. 2004 Jul;79(7):682-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200407000-00015.
6
Medical ethics education: past, present, and future.医学伦理教育:过去、现在与未来。
Acad Med. 1995 Sep;70(9):761-9.