Yeo Sanghee
Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Korean J Med Educ. 2019 Sep;31(3):261-269. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2019.136. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
The purposes of this study were to analyze the course outcomes of integrated courses of a medical school that introduced an outcome-based curriculum and to suggest ways to improve techniques in the description of outcomes.
In order to investigate the course outcomes of 39 courses in the first and second grades at Kyungpook National University School of Medicine in Korea, verbs for the course outcome were classified according to Bloom's taxonomy and frequency analysis was completed. The appropriateness of use of verbs in description of the outcomes was also analyzed.
The total number of course outcomes for both grades was 497. The number of course outcomes per credit ranged from a minimum of 0.9 to a maximum of 22.0. Most of the course outcomes were classified as the comprehension domain according to Bloom's taxonomy. The most frequently used verb was "explain," accounting for 61.0% (n=303) of the entire course outcome verbs. Some verbs in the outcomes, however, were unmeasurable.
The major findings of this study include the followings. First, the number of course outcomes varied according to courses. Second, several course outcomes included unmeasurable verbs. Finally, most of the verbs used to describe course outcome belonged to the two lower levels of Bloom's taxonomy-knowledge and comprehension. In order to improve the description of course outcomes, this study suggests that it is necessary to adjust the number of course outcomes, applicate overt behavior verbs, and elevate the level of course outcomes from the lower memorizing level to the higher application level.
本研究旨在分析一所医学院引入基于结果的课程后的综合课程的课程成果,并提出改进结果描述技巧的方法。
为了调查韩国庆北国立大学医学院一、二年级39门课程的课程成果,根据布鲁姆分类法对课程成果的动词进行分类,并完成频率分析。还分析了动词在结果描述中的使用适当性。
两个年级的课程成果总数为497个。每学分的课程成果数量从最少0.9个到最多22.0个不等。根据布鲁姆分类法,大多数课程成果被归类为理解领域。最常用的动词是“解释”,占整个课程成果动词的61.0%(n = 303)。然而,结果中的一些动词是不可测量的。
本研究的主要发现如下。第一,课程成果的数量因课程而异。第二,一些课程成果包含不可测量的动词。最后,用于描述课程成果的大多数动词属于布鲁姆分类法的两个较低层次——知识和理解。为了改进课程成果的描述,本研究建议有必要调整课程成果的数量,应用公开行为动词,并将课程成果的层次从较低的记忆层次提升到较高的应用层次。