a UMR CNRS 5623, Université Paul-Sabatier , Toulouse , France Toulouse , France.
Nat Prod Res. 2013;27(19):1795-9. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2012.755680. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
In this study, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) with CO2 and hydrodistillation (HD) were compared as methods to isolate the essential oil from Cupressus sempervirens. The odour of the oil obtained by SFE at 90 bar and 40°C was very close to the odour of the leaves of C. sempervirens before the extraction. Compounds extracted by both SFE and HD were identified by GC-FID and GC-MS. Moreover, the difference in the chemical composition obtained by SFE and HD was quite noticeable qualitatively and quantitatively. Phenolic composition and antioxidant activity were also determined. Compared to HD, the SFE method presents some advantages: the extraction was completed after 1 h in SFE, although 4 h is necessary for HD, and the yield was improved by 34%. Finally, it has also been shown that SFE is very selective towards some specific components such as manoyl oxide, trans-totarol and α-acoradiene.
在这项研究中,比较了超临界流体萃取(SFE)与二氧化碳和水蒸馏(HD)作为从柏木中提取精油的方法。在 90 巴和 40°C 下通过 SFE 获得的油的气味非常接近提取前柏木叶的气味。通过 GC-FID 和 GC-MS 鉴定了通过 SFE 和 HD 提取的化合物。此外,通过 SFE 和 HD 获得的化学成分的差异在定性和定量上都非常明显。还测定了酚类组成和抗氧化活性。与 HD 相比,SFE 方法具有一些优势:SFE 中的提取在 1 小时内完成,而 HD 需要 4 小时,并且收率提高了 34%。最后,还表明 SFE 对某些特定成分(如曼诺氧化物、反式贝壳杉烯和α-石竹烯)具有很高的选择性。