Suppr超能文献

颈丛阻滞与全身麻醉在颈动脉手术中的应用:单中心经验。

Cervical plexus block versus general anesthesia in carotid surgery: single center experience.

机构信息

Center for Anesthesia, Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Arch Med Sci. 2012 Dec 20;8(6):1035-40. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2012.32411. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Carotid endarterectomy may be performed under general (GA) or regional anesthesia (RA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of anesthetic techniques on perioperative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing carotid surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study included 1098 consecutive patients operated on between 2003 and 2009 (773 underwent cervical plexus block and 325 underwent general anesthesia).

RESULTS

There were 6 deaths, 3 (0.9%) after GA and 3 (0.4%) after RA (p = 0.272). Neurological complication rates were not significantly different (GA 2.1% vs. RA 1.1%, p = 0.212). Incidence of myocardial infarction was similar (GA 0.31% vs. LA 0.39%, p = 0.840). Shunt placement rate was the same in both groups, 11.1%. Total operating time and carotid clamping time were significantly shorter in RA patients (RA: 92 min vs. GA: 106 min; p < 0.001 and RA: 18 min vs. GA: 19 min; p = 0.040). There was no significant difference in number of reinterventions (RA: 1.0% vs. GA: 0.6%; p = 0.504). Pulmonary complications were common in the GA group (RA: 0 vs. GA 0.9%; p = 0.007). Time to first postoperative analgesic was significantly shorter in the GA group (RA: 226 min vs. GA: 139 min; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Type of anesthesia does not affect the outcome of surgical treatment of carotid disease. However, it should be stressed that fewer respiratory complications, later requirement for first postoperative analgesic, and an awake patient who can continue oral therapy early after surgery, give priority to regional techniques of anesthesia.

摘要

简介

颈动脉内膜切除术可在全身麻醉(GA)或区域麻醉(RA)下进行。本研究旨在评估麻醉技术对颈动脉手术患者围手术期死亡率和发病率的影响。

材料和方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了 2003 年至 2009 年间连续进行的 1098 例手术患者(773 例行颈丛阻滞,325 例行全身麻醉)。

结果

共有 6 例死亡,3 例(0.9%)发生在 GA 后,3 例(0.4%)发生在 RA 后(p = 0.272)。神经并发症发生率无显著差异(GA 2.1% vs. RA 1.1%,p = 0.212)。心肌梗死发生率相似(GA 0.31% vs. LA 0.39%,p = 0.840)。两组分流器放置率相同,为 11.1%。RA 患者的总手术时间和颈动脉夹闭时间明显更短(RA:92 分钟 vs. GA:106 分钟;p < 0.001 和 RA:18 分钟 vs. GA:19 分钟;p = 0.040)。再次干预的次数无显著差异(RA:1.0% vs. GA:0.6%;p = 0.504)。GA 组肺部并发症更为常见(RA:0 例 vs. GA:0.9%;p = 0.007)。GA 组术后首次镇痛时间明显更短(RA:226 分钟 vs. GA:139 分钟;p < 0.001)。

结论

麻醉类型不影响颈动脉疾病手术治疗的结果。然而,应强调的是,区域麻醉技术具有更少的呼吸并发症、术后首次镇痛需求时间更晚以及术后早期清醒患者可继续口服治疗等优势。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术的局部麻醉与全身麻醉
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD000126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000126.pub3.
8
Hemodynamic status following regional and general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1989 Mar;1(1):35-40. doi: 10.1097/00008506-198903000-00007.
10
Local versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: report of 329 cases.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2003 May-Jun;37(3):171-7. doi: 10.1177/153857440303700303.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验