• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈丛阻滞与全身麻醉在颈动脉手术中的应用:单中心经验。

Cervical plexus block versus general anesthesia in carotid surgery: single center experience.

机构信息

Center for Anesthesia, Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Arch Med Sci. 2012 Dec 20;8(6):1035-40. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2012.32411. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

DOI:10.5114/aoms.2012.32411
PMID:23319978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3542493/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Carotid endarterectomy may be performed under general (GA) or regional anesthesia (RA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of anesthetic techniques on perioperative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing carotid surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study included 1098 consecutive patients operated on between 2003 and 2009 (773 underwent cervical plexus block and 325 underwent general anesthesia).

RESULTS

There were 6 deaths, 3 (0.9%) after GA and 3 (0.4%) after RA (p = 0.272). Neurological complication rates were not significantly different (GA 2.1% vs. RA 1.1%, p = 0.212). Incidence of myocardial infarction was similar (GA 0.31% vs. LA 0.39%, p = 0.840). Shunt placement rate was the same in both groups, 11.1%. Total operating time and carotid clamping time were significantly shorter in RA patients (RA: 92 min vs. GA: 106 min; p < 0.001 and RA: 18 min vs. GA: 19 min; p = 0.040). There was no significant difference in number of reinterventions (RA: 1.0% vs. GA: 0.6%; p = 0.504). Pulmonary complications were common in the GA group (RA: 0 vs. GA 0.9%; p = 0.007). Time to first postoperative analgesic was significantly shorter in the GA group (RA: 226 min vs. GA: 139 min; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Type of anesthesia does not affect the outcome of surgical treatment of carotid disease. However, it should be stressed that fewer respiratory complications, later requirement for first postoperative analgesic, and an awake patient who can continue oral therapy early after surgery, give priority to regional techniques of anesthesia.

摘要

简介

颈动脉内膜切除术可在全身麻醉(GA)或区域麻醉(RA)下进行。本研究旨在评估麻醉技术对颈动脉手术患者围手术期死亡率和发病率的影响。

材料和方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了 2003 年至 2009 年间连续进行的 1098 例手术患者(773 例行颈丛阻滞,325 例行全身麻醉)。

结果

共有 6 例死亡,3 例(0.9%)发生在 GA 后,3 例(0.4%)发生在 RA 后(p = 0.272)。神经并发症发生率无显著差异(GA 2.1% vs. RA 1.1%,p = 0.212)。心肌梗死发生率相似(GA 0.31% vs. LA 0.39%,p = 0.840)。两组分流器放置率相同,为 11.1%。RA 患者的总手术时间和颈动脉夹闭时间明显更短(RA:92 分钟 vs. GA:106 分钟;p < 0.001 和 RA:18 分钟 vs. GA:19 分钟;p = 0.040)。再次干预的次数无显著差异(RA:1.0% vs. GA:0.6%;p = 0.504)。GA 组肺部并发症更为常见(RA:0 例 vs. GA:0.9%;p = 0.007)。GA 组术后首次镇痛时间明显更短(RA:226 分钟 vs. GA:139 分钟;p < 0.001)。

结论

麻醉类型不影响颈动脉疾病手术治疗的结果。然而,应强调的是,区域麻醉技术具有更少的呼吸并发症、术后首次镇痛需求时间更晚以及术后早期清醒患者可继续口服治疗等优势。

相似文献

1
Cervical plexus block versus general anesthesia in carotid surgery: single center experience.颈丛阻滞与全身麻醉在颈动脉手术中的应用:单中心经验。
Arch Med Sci. 2012 Dec 20;8(6):1035-40. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2012.32411. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
2
Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy according to the Anesthetic Method: General versus Regional Anesthesia.根据麻醉方法进行颈动脉内膜切除术的结果:全身麻醉与区域麻醉对比
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Dec;52(6):392-399. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.6.392. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
3
Ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block under dexmedetomidine sedation versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective pilot study.右美托咪定镇静下超声引导颈浅丛阻滞与全身麻醉用于颈动脉内膜切除术的回顾性初步研究
Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2018 Jun;35(1):45-53. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2018.35.1.45. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
4
Anesthetic type and risk of myocardial infarction after carotid endarterectomy in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)中颈动脉内膜切除术后的麻醉类型与心肌梗死风险
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):3-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.047. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
5
Anesthesia Type is Associated with Decreased Cranial Nerve Injury in Carotid Endarterectomy.麻醉类型与颈动脉内膜切除术颅神经损伤减少相关。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;70:318-325. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.12.033. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
6
Incidence of and indications for conversion of cervical plexus block to general anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid surgery: a single center experience.颈动脉手术患者颈丛阻滞转为全身麻醉的发生率及指征:单中心经验
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Jun;56(3):441-6. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
7
Locoregional versus general anesthesia in carotid surgery: is there an impact on perioperative myocardial ischemia? Results of a prospective monocentric randomized trial.颈动脉手术中局部区域麻醉与全身麻醉的比较:对围手术期心肌缺血有影响吗?一项前瞻性单中心随机试验的结果
J Vasc Surg. 1999 Jul;30(1):131-8. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70185-0.
8
Increased resource utilization and overall morbidity are associated with general versus regional anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy in data collected by the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative.在密歇根外科质量协作组织收集的数据中,与颈动脉内膜切除术采用全身麻醉相比,采用区域麻醉会增加资源利用和总体发病率。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Sep;66(3):802-809. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.060. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
9
The impact of general versus local anesthesia on early subclinical cognitive function following carotid endarterectomy evaluated using P3 event-related potentials.使用 P3 事件相关电位评估全身麻醉与局部麻醉对颈动脉内膜切除术早期亚临床认知功能的影响。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Mar;154(3):433-8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-011-1270-4. Epub 2012 Jan 15.
10
Anesthetic type and hospital outcomes after carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative database.从血管质量倡议数据库看颈动脉内膜切除术的麻醉类型与医院转归。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 May;67(5):1419-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.028. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy - general or loco-regional?颈动脉内膜切除术的麻醉——全身麻醉还是局部区域麻醉?
Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Apr;22(1):17-24.
2
Cervical plexus anesthesia versus general anesthesia for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery: A randomized clinical trial.颈前路椎间盘切除融合手术中颈丛麻醉与全身麻醉的比较:一项随机临床试验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(7):e6119. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006119.

本文引用的文献

1
General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.颈动脉手术全身麻醉与局部麻醉对比研究(GALA):一项多中心随机对照试验
Lancet. 2008 Dec 20;372(9656):2132-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61699-2. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
2
Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术的局部麻醉与全身麻醉
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD000126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000126.pub3.
3
Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy--improving the gold standard ?颈动脉内膜切除术的局部麻醉与全身麻醉——改进金标准?
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Aug;36(2):145-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 May 15.
4
Carotid Artery Stump Pressure (CASP) in 1135 consecutive endarterectomies under general anesthesia: an old method that survived the test of times.1135例连续全麻下动脉内膜切除术患者的颈动脉残端压力(CASP):一种经受住时间考验的古老方法。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2007 Dec;48(6):677-81.
5
Accuracy of cerebral monitoring in detecting cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy: a comparison of transcranial Doppler sonography, near-infrared spectroscopy, stump pressure, and somatosensory evoked potentials.颈动脉内膜切除术期间脑监测检测脑缺血的准确性:经颅多普勒超声、近红外光谱、残端压力和体感诱发电位的比较
Anesthesiology. 2007 Oct;107(4):563-9. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000281894.69422.ff.
6
Regional or general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy? Evidence from published prospective and retrospective studies.颈动脉内膜切除术采用区域麻醉还是全身麻醉?来自已发表的前瞻性和回顾性研究的证据。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Feb;21(1):127-32. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.07.022. Epub 2006 Oct 24.
7
Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery.腹主动脉手术中硬膜外镇痛与基于全身性阿片类药物的镇痛效果比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD005059. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005059.pub2.
8
Hemodynamic status following regional and general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1989 Mar;1(1):35-40. doi: 10.1097/00008506-198903000-00007.
9
Perioperative stress response to carotid endarterectomy: the impact of anesthetic modality.颈动脉内膜切除术围手术期应激反应:麻醉方式的影响
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jun;39(6):1295-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.02.002.
10
Local versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: report of 329 cases.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2003 May-Jun;37(3):171-7. doi: 10.1177/153857440303700303.