Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术期间脑监测检测脑缺血的准确性:经颅多普勒超声、近红外光谱、残端压力和体感诱发电位的比较

Accuracy of cerebral monitoring in detecting cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy: a comparison of transcranial Doppler sonography, near-infrared spectroscopy, stump pressure, and somatosensory evoked potentials.

作者信息

Moritz Stefan, Kasprzak Piotr, Arlt Matthias, Taeger Kai, Metz Christoph

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2007 Oct;107(4):563-9. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000281894.69422.ff.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compares the accuracy of cerebral monitoring systems in detecting cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy.

METHODS

The authors compared transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD), near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), stump pressure (SP) measurement, and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) in 48 patients undergoing carotid surgery during regional anesthesia. Cerebral ischemia was assumed when neurologic deterioration occurred. During clamping, the minimum mean middle cerebral artery velocity (TCD(min)), its percentage change (TCD%), the minimum regional saturation of oxygen (NIRS(min)), its percentage change (NIRS%), the mean SP, and the changes of SEP amplitude were recorded. To analyze the corresponding sensitivity and specificity of each parameter, the authors performed receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Neurologic deterioration occurred in 12 patients. SP and NIRS were successfully performed in all patients. TCD monitoring was not possible in 10 (21%); SEP was not possible in 2 patients (4%). All parameters provided the ability to distinguish between ischemic and nonischemic patients. TCD% and NIRS% showed significantly better discrimination than TCD(min) and NIRS(min) (P < 0.05). The highest area under the curve (AUC) was found for TCD% (AUC = 0.973), but there was no significant difference compared with NIRS% (AUC = 0.905) and SP (AUC = 0.925). The lowest AUC was found for SEP (AUC = 0.749), which was significantly lower than that for TCD%, NIRS%, and SP.

CONCLUSIONS

TCD%, NIRS%, and SP measurement provide similar accuracy for the detection of cerebral ischemia during carotid surgery. Lower accuracy was found for SEP monitoring. Because of the high rate of technical difficulties (21%), TCD monitoring was the least practical of the investigated monitoring devices.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了颈动脉内膜切除术期间脑监测系统检测脑缺血的准确性。

方法

作者比较了48例在区域麻醉下接受颈动脉手术患者的经颅多普勒超声(TCD)、近红外光谱(NIRS)、残端压力(SP)测量和体感诱发电位(SEP)。当出现神经功能恶化时,假定发生脑缺血。在夹闭期间,记录大脑中动脉最小平均血流速度(TCD(min))、其百分比变化(TCD%)、最小局部氧饱和度(NIRS(min))、其百分比变化(NIRS%)、平均SP以及SEP波幅的变化。为分析各参数相应的敏感性和特异性,作者进行了受试者工作特征分析。

结果

12例患者出现神经功能恶化。所有患者均成功进行了SP和NIRS测量。10例患者(21%)无法进行TCD监测;2例患者(4%)无法进行SEP监测。所有参数都能够区分缺血和非缺血患者。TCD%和NIRS%的鉴别能力明显优于TCD(min)和NIRS(min)(P<0.05)。TCD%的曲线下面积(AUC)最高(AUC = 0.973),但与NIRS%(AUC = 0.905)和SP(AUC = 0.925)相比无显著差异。SEP的AUC最低(AUC = 0.749),明显低于TCD%、NIRS%和SP。

结论

TCD%、NIRS%和SP测量在颈动脉手术期间检测脑缺血方面具有相似的准确性。SEP监测的准确性较低。由于技术困难发生率高(21%),TCD监测是所研究的监测设备中实用性最低的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验