• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从健康专业人员视角看直接面向消费者的基因检测:文献系统综述

Direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature.

作者信息

Goldsmith Lesley, Jackson Leigh, O'Connor Anita, Skirton Heather

机构信息

Faculty of Health, Education and Society, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Plymouth University, Room 300, Hepworth House, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK,

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2013 Apr;4(2):169-80. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0135-8. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1007/s12687-012-0135-8
PMID:23322235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3666834/
Abstract

Since the 1990s, there has been a rapid expansion in the number and type of genetic tests available via health professionals; the last 10 years, however, have seen certain types of genetic and genomic tests available direct-to-consumer. The aim of this systematic review was to explore the topic of direct-to-consumer genetic testing from the health professional perspective. Search terms used to identify studies were 'direct-to-consumer', personal genom*, health* professional*, physician* 'genomic, genetic' in five bibliographic databases, together with citation searching. Eight quantitative papers were reviewed. Findings indicate a low level of awareness and experience of direct-to-consumer testing in health professionals. Inconsistent levels of knowledge and understanding were also found with two studies showing significant effects for gender and age. Concerns about clinical utility and lack of counselling were identified. Health professionals specialising in genetics were most likely to express concerns. There was also evidence of perceived increased workload for health professionals post-testing. However, some health professionals rated such tests clinically useful and cited benefits such as the increased opportunity for early screening. Despite limited awareness, knowledge and experience of actual cases, we concluded that the concerns and potential benefits expressed may be warranted. It may be useful to explore the attitudes and experiences of health professionals in more depth using a qualitative approach. Finally, it is essential that health professionals receive sufficient education and guidelines to equip them to help patients presenting with the results of these tests.

摘要

自20世纪90年代以来,通过医疗专业人员提供的基因检测数量和类型迅速增加;然而,在过去10年中,某些类型的基因和基因组检测已直接面向消费者。本系统评价的目的是从医疗专业人员的角度探讨直接面向消费者的基因检测这一主题。用于识别研究的检索词为“直接面向消费者”、“个人基因组*”、“健康专业人员”、 “医生*”、“基因组、基因”,在五个书目数据库中进行检索,并进行引文检索。共审查了八篇定量研究论文。研究结果表明,医疗专业人员对直接面向消费者的检测的知晓程度和经验水平较低。还发现知识和理解水平不一致,两项研究表明性别和年龄有显著影响。确定了对临床实用性和缺乏咨询的担忧。专门从事遗传学的医疗专业人员最有可能表达担忧。也有证据表明,医疗专业人员在检测后感觉工作量增加。然而,一些医疗专业人员认为此类检测在临床上有用,并列举了诸如增加早期筛查机会等好处。尽管对实际案例的认识、知识和经验有限,但我们得出结论,所表达的担忧和潜在好处可能是有道理的。采用定性方法更深入地探讨医疗专业人员的态度和经验可能会有所帮助。最后,至关重要的是,医疗专业人员应接受足够的教育并获得指导方针,以使他们有能力帮助那些带来这些检测结果的患者。

相似文献

1
Direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature.从健康专业人员视角看直接面向消费者的基因检测:文献系统综述
J Community Genet. 2013 Apr;4(2):169-80. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0135-8. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
2
Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives.直接面向消费者的基因组检测:用户视角文献的系统综述。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Aug;20(8):811-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.18. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.基于互联网的直接面向消费者的基因检测:一项系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 14;17(12):e279. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4378.
8
Direct to consumer genetic testing: a systematic review of position statements, policies and recommendations.直接面向消费者的基因检测:立场声明、政策和建议的系统评价。
Clin Genet. 2012 Sep;82(3):210-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01863.x. Epub 2012 Apr 8.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an updated systematic review of healthcare professionals' knowledge and views, and ethical and legal concerns.直接面向消费者的基因检测:医疗保健专业人员知识和观点的最新系统评价,以及伦理和法律问题。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Dec;30(12):1331-1343. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01205-8. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
2
Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework.制定直接面向消费者的基因检测法规的考量:使用3-I框架的范围综述
J Community Genet. 2022 Apr;13(2):155-170. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00582-3. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
3
May direct-to-consumer genetic testing have an impact on general practitioners' daily practice? a cross-sectional study of patients' intentions towards this approach.直接面向消费者的基因检测会对全科医生的日常实践产生影响吗?一项针对患者对此方法意向的横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Apr 26;22(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01428-6.
4
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Barriers toward Genetic Testing and Pharmacogenomics among Healthcare Workers in the United Arab Emirates: A Cross-Sectional Study.阿联酋医护人员对基因检测和药物基因组学的知识、态度及感知障碍:一项横断面研究
J Pers Med. 2020 Nov 9;10(4):216. doi: 10.3390/jpm10040216.
5
The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review.高收入国家临床遗传学劳动力的构成和能力:范围综述。
Genet Med. 2020 Sep;22(9):1437-1449. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0825-2. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
6
European citizens' perspectives on direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an updated systematic review.欧洲公民对直接面向消费者的基因检测的看法:一项最新的系统综述。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 May 3;33(5):947-53. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz246.
7
Returning Results in the Genomic Era: Initial Experiences of the eMERGE Network.基因组时代的结果反馈:eMERGE网络的初步经验
J Pers Med. 2020 Apr 27;10(2):30. doi: 10.3390/jpm10020030.
8
Informing Integration of Genomic Medicine Into Primary Care: An Assessment of Current Practice, Attitudes, and Desired Resources.告知将基因组医学纳入初级保健:对当前实践、态度和所需资源的评估。
Front Genet. 2019 Nov 21;10:1189. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01189. eCollection 2019.
9
Physician Experience with Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing in Kaiser Permanente.凯撒医疗集团中医生对直接面向消费者的基因检测的体验
J Pers Med. 2019 Nov 1;9(4):47. doi: 10.3390/jpm9040047.
10
Comparison of Nutrigenomics Technology Interface Tools for Consumers and Health Professionals: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Investigation.面向消费者和健康专业人员的营养基因组学技术界面工具比较:一项序列解释性混合方法调查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 28;21(6):e12580. doi: 10.2196/12580.

本文引用的文献

1
A critical view of the general public's awareness and physicians' opinion of the trends and potential pitfalls of genetic testing in Greece.对希腊公众对基因检测趋势和潜在陷阱的认知以及医生看法的批判性审视。
Per Med. 2011 Sep;8(5):551-561. doi: 10.2217/pme.11.48.
2
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: more questions than benefits?直接面向消费者的基因检测:问题多于益处?
Per Med. 2008 Jul;5(4):317-320. doi: 10.2217/17410541.5.4.317.
3
Association between health-service use and multiplex genetic testing.医疗服务利用与多重基因检测的关联。
Genet Med. 2012 Oct;14(10):852-9. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.52. Epub 2012 May 17.
4
An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice.探索遗传健康专业人员在临床实践中直接面向消费者的基因检测经验。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Aug;20(8):825-30. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.13. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
5
Five years of GWAS discovery.GWAS 发现的五年。
Am J Hum Genet. 2012 Jan 13;90(1):7-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.11.029.
6
Prospective comparison of family medical history with personal genome screening for risk assessment of common cancers.前瞻性比较家族病史与个人基因组筛查在常见癌症风险评估中的应用。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 May;20(5):547-51. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.224. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
7
Educational needs of primary care physicians regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing.初级保健医生对直接面向消费者的基因检测的教育需求。
J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):469-78. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9471-9. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
8
The impact of risk information exposure on women's beliefs about direct-to-consumer genetic testing for BRCA mutations.风险信息披露对女性关于直接面向消费者的 BRCA 基因突变基因检测的信念的影响。
Clin Genet. 2012 Jan;81(1):29-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01797.x. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
9
Primary care physicians' awareness, experience and opinions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.初级保健医生对直接面向消费者的基因检测的认知、经验和看法。
J Genet Couns. 2012 Feb;21(1):113-26. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9390-9. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
10
Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants.个性化基因组学早期采用者的动机与认知:来自研究参与者的观点
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(1):22-30. doi: 10.1159/000327296. Epub 2011 Jun 3.