• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical decision making in renal pain management.肾痛管理中的临床决策
Acta Inform Med. 2012 Mar;20(1):18-21. doi: 10.5455/aim.2012.20.19-21.
2
[Comparative efficiency study, safety and usage of tested drugs in patients with renal colic].[肾绞痛患者中受试药物的比较疗效研究、安全性及使用情况]
Med Arh. 2006;60(6 Suppl 1):37-40.
3
Comparison of cizolirtine citrate and metamizol sodium in the treatment of adult acute renal colic: a randomized, double-blind, clinical pilot study.枸橼酸西唑利汀与安乃近治疗成人急性肾绞痛的比较:一项随机、双盲临床试验研究
Clin Ther. 2004 Jul;26(7):1061-72. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90178-6.
4
Intravenous Morphine vs Intravenous Ketofol for Treating Renal Colic; a Randomized Controlled Trial.静脉注射吗啡与静脉注射氯胺酮-丙泊酚用于治疗肾绞痛的随机对照试验
Emerg (Tehran). 2016 Nov;4(4):202-206.
5
Randomized double blinded placebo controlled trial comparing diclofenac and piroxicam in management of acute renal colic and its clinical implications.比较双氯芬酸和吡罗昔康治疗急性肾绞痛的随机双盲安慰剂对照试验及其临床意义。
Urol J. 2015 Apr 29;12(2):2069-73.
6
Beta-blockers for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的β受体阻滞剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD002003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub2.
7
Double-blind study with dipyrone versus tramadol and butylscopolamine in acute renal colic pain.双盲研究:安乃近与曲马多及丁溴东莨菪碱治疗急性肾绞痛的疗效比较
World J Urol. 1994;12(3):155-61. doi: 10.1007/BF00192278.
8
Treatment of loin pain suspected to be renal colic with papaverine hydrochloride: a prospective double-blind randomised study.盐酸罂粟碱治疗疑似肾绞痛的腰痛:一项前瞻性双盲随机研究。
BJU Int. 2012 Aug;110(3):449-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10793.x. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
9
Linking evidence-based medicine therapeutic summary measures to clinical decision analysis.将循证医学治疗总结指标与临床决策分析相联系。
MedGenMed. 2000 Jan 13;2(1):E6.
10
An assessment of the clinical efficacy of intranasal desmopressin spray in the treatment of renal colic.评估鼻内去氨加压素喷雾剂治疗肾绞痛的临床疗效。
BJU Int. 2001 Mar;87(4):322-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.00068.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain Management in the Emergency Department: a Review Article on Options and Methods.急诊科的疼痛管理:关于选择与方法的综述文章
Adv J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun 24;2(4):e45. doi: 10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.93. eCollection 2018 Fall.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence based medicine: does it make a difference? Use wisely.循证医学:它有作用吗?明智地使用。
BMJ. 2005 Jan 8;330(7482):92; discussion 94. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7482.92.
2
Systematic review of the relative efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the treatment of acute renal colic.非甾体抗炎药与阿片类药物治疗急性肾绞痛相对疗效的系统评价。
BMJ. 2004 Jun 12;328(7453):1401. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38119.581991.55. Epub 2004 Jun 3.
3
A categorization and analysis of the criticisms of Evidence-Based Medicine.对循证医学批评的分类与分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2004 Feb;73(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.11.002.
4
Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders and Predictors of Pain Management Program Success in Patients With Chronic Pain.慢性疼痛患者的共病精神障碍与疼痛管理项目成功的预测因素
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Aug;4(4):137-140. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v04n0404.
5
The two faces of medical evidence.医学证据的两面性。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2002 Jul 27;132(29-30):397-400. doi: 10.4414/smw.2002.10071.
6
Comparative study of electronic vs. paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers.电子视觉模拟评分法(VAS)与纸质VAS评分的比较研究:一项使用健康志愿者的随机交叉试验。
Pain. 2002 Sep;99(1-2):341-7. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00178-1.
7
The treatment of pain in urology.
BJU Int. 2002 Sep;90(5):481-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02908.x.
8
Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease.自我管理项目对慢性病患者的影响。
Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Nov-Dec;4(6):256-62.
9
Pain evaluation of patients with fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, and low back pain.
Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2001 Jan-Feb;56(1):5-10. doi: 10.1590/s0041-87812001000100002.
10
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.循证医学:它是什么以及不是什么。
BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.

肾痛管理中的临床决策

Clinical decision making in renal pain management.

作者信息

Aganovic Damir, Prcic Alen, Kulovac Benjamin, Hadziosmanovic Osman

机构信息

Urologiy clinic, Sarajevo University Clinical Center, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

出版信息

Acta Inform Med. 2012 Mar;20(1):18-21. doi: 10.5455/aim.2012.20.19-21.

DOI:10.5455/aim.2012.20.19-21
PMID:23322949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3545323/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the optimal medication for the treatment of renal colic using evidence based medicine (EBM) parameters (RR, ARR, NNT, NNH, ARI, RRI).

SAMPLE AND METHODOLOGY

During 2010, an ITT study was conducted on 400 outpatients of the Sarajevo University Clinical Center Urology Clinic in order to investigate renal colic pain relief drugs. Each group consisting of 100 patients was administered either Metamizol amp. i.v., or Diclofenac amp. i.m., or Butylscopolamine amp. i.v., while 100 patients belonged to the placebo group that was given distilled water (aqua redestilata). All patients completed visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) from 0 to 10 prior to and after the treatment.

RESULTS

Using EBM parameters Diclofenac Na and Metamizol were shown to be the most efficient in the treatment of renal colic. In these two groups, relative risk (RR) was 21 and 8,5% respectively; Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) was 74 and 86% respectively, and Number Needed to Treat (NNT) was 1 for both groups, while chi-squared (X2) test has shown that there is no statistically significant difference between these two drugs when it comes to their effect. In the Butylscopolamine group, RR was 81; ARR 18%, while NNT was 5. With respect to side effects, only in his group it was shown that Relative Risk Increase (RRI) was 84, ARI 83%, while Number Needed to Harm (NNH) was 2.

CONCLUSION

The most optimal medication for the treatment of renal colic according to EBM parameters is Diclofenac Na, followed by Metamizol. Butylscopolamine is not recommended for the treatment of renal colic.

摘要

目的

运用循证医学(EBM)参数(相对危险度、绝对危险度降低率、需治疗人数、需伤害人数、归因危险度增加率、相对危险度增加率)确定治疗肾绞痛的最佳药物。

样本与方法

2010年期间,在萨拉热窝大学临床中心泌尿外科门诊对400名门诊患者进行了意向性分析研究,以调查缓解肾绞痛的药物。每组100名患者,分别静脉注射安乃近、肌肉注射双氯芬酸、静脉注射丁溴东莨菪碱,另有100名患者属于安慰剂组,给予蒸馏水。所有患者在治疗前后均完成了0至10的视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAPS)评分。

结果

运用EBM参数显示,双氯芬酸钠和安乃近在治疗肾绞痛方面最为有效。在这两组中,相对危险度(RR)分别为21%和8.5%;绝对危险度降低率(ARR)分别为74%和86%,两组的需治疗人数(NNT)均为1,而卡方(X2)检验表明,这两种药物在疗效方面无统计学显著差异。在丁溴东莨菪碱组中,RR为81%;ARR为18%,而NNT为5。关于副作用,仅在该组显示相对危险度增加率(RRI)为84%,归因危险度增加率(ARI)为83%,而需伤害人数(NNH)为2。

结论

根据EBM参数,治疗肾绞痛的最佳药物是双氯芬酸钠,其次是安乃近。不推荐使用丁溴东莨菪碱治疗肾绞痛。