Ferreira Oranice, Passos Afonso Dinis Costa
Centro Regional de Hemoterapia de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2012;34(6):411-5. doi: 10.5581/1516-8484.20120103.
This study aimed to investigate the frequency of positive results for hepatitis B and C, HIV and syphilis in blood donations at the Centro Regional de Hemoterapia de Ribeirão Preto, to describe donors with positive results according to some demographic and socioeconomic variables, to identify risk factors associated to these donors and the reasons that they were not detected during clinical screening.
A descriptive study was performed between July 1(st) 2005 and July 31(st) 2006 by interviewing 106 donorsafter medical consultations where they were informed of positive results for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV or syphilis.
There was a predominance of first-time donors, males, under 50-year olds, married individuals, from Ribeirão Preto, with elementary education, low economic status and of people who donated at the request of friends or relatives. Hepatitis C was the most frequently detected infection (56.6%), followed by hepatitis B (20.7%), HIV (12.3%) and syphilis(10.4%). About 40% of donors had omitted risk factors for different reasons: because they trusted the results of serological tests, did not feel comfortable about talking of risk factors or did not consider them relevant. Other justifications were the duration of the interview, the interviewer was unskilled, embarrassment and doubts about confidentiality.
The results indicate the need for changes in the approach to clinical screening and a review of methods to attract and guide potential donors.
本研究旨在调查里贝朗普雷图地区血液中心献血者中乙肝、丙肝、艾滋病毒和梅毒检测呈阳性结果的频率,根据一些人口统计学和社会经济变量描述检测呈阳性结果的献血者,识别与这些献血者相关的风险因素以及他们在临床筛查中未被检测出的原因。
2005年7月1日至2006年7月31日期间进行了一项描述性研究,对106名在被告知乙肝、丙肝、艾滋病毒或梅毒检测呈阳性结果的医学咨询后接受访谈的献血者进行了调查。
首次献血者、男性、50岁以下、已婚、来自里贝朗普雷图、具有小学教育程度、经济状况较差以及应朋友或亲属要求献血的人占多数。丙肝是最常检测出的感染(56.6%),其次是乙肝(20.7%)、艾滋病毒(12.3%)和梅毒(10.4%)。约40%的献血者因不同原因隐瞒了风险因素:因为他们相信血清学检测结果,对谈论风险因素感到不自在或认为其无关紧要。其他理由包括访谈时间、访谈者不熟练、尴尬以及对保密性的怀疑。
结果表明需要改变临床筛查方法,并对吸引和指导潜在献血者的方式进行审查。