• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理妇产科服务中的信息和知识:隐私和同意问题。

Managing information and knowledge within maternity services: Privacy and consent issues.

机构信息

Ted Rogers School of Health Services Management and School of Information Technology Management, Chronic Disease Management and Prevention (CDMAP) Research Centre, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Inform Health Soc Care. 2013 Sep;38(3):196-210. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2012.735732. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

DOI:10.3109/17538157.2012.735732
PMID:23323681
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Electronic Patient Records have improved vastly the quality and efficiency of care delivered. However, the formation of single demographic database and the ease of electronic information sharing give rise to many concerns including issues of consent, by whom and how data are accessed and used. This paper examines the organizational and socio-technical issues related to privacy, confidentiality and security when employing electronic records within a maternity service hospital in England.

METHODS

A preliminary questionnaire was administered (n  =  52), in total, 24 responses were received. Sixteen responses were from personnel in the information technology department, 5 from health information department and 3 from midwifery managers. This was followed by a semi-structured interview with representatives from the clinical and technological side.

RESULTS

A number of issues related to information governance (IG) have been identified, especially breaches on sharing personal information without consent from the patients have been identified as one immediate challenge that needs to be fixed.

CONCLUSION

There is an immediate need for more robust, realistic, built-in accountability both locally and nationally on data sharing. A culture of ownership and strict adherence to IG principles is paramount. Focused training in the area of data, information and knowledge sharing will bring in a balance of legitimate usage against the individual's rights to confidentiality and privacy.

摘要

目的

电子病历大大提高了医疗服务的质量和效率。然而,单一人口统计学数据库的形成和电子信息共享的便利性引发了许多关注,包括同意问题、由谁访问和使用数据以及如何访问和使用数据等问题。本文研究了在英格兰一家产科医院使用电子记录时与隐私、保密性和安全性相关的组织和社会技术问题。

方法

初步问卷调查(n=52),共收到 24 份回复。16 份来自信息技术部门的人员,5 份来自健康信息部门,3 份来自助产士经理。随后对临床和技术方面的代表进行了半结构化访谈。

结果

已经确定了一些与信息治理(IG)相关的问题,特别是未经患者同意就共享个人信息的违规行为,被认为是需要立即解决的一个挑战。

结论

在本地和全国范围内,立即需要更强大、更现实、内置的问责制来规范数据共享。拥有所有权和严格遵守 IG 原则至关重要。在数据、信息和知识共享领域进行集中培训,将在合法使用与个人保密和隐私权利之间取得平衡。

相似文献

1
Managing information and knowledge within maternity services: Privacy and consent issues.管理妇产科服务中的信息和知识:隐私和同意问题。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2013 Sep;38(3):196-210. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2012.735732. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
2
e-Consent design and implementation issues for health information managers.电子知情同意书在健康信息管理者中的设计和实施问题。
Health Inf Manag. 2004;33(3):84-8. doi: 10.1177/183335830403300304.
3
Privacy, consent, and the electronic mental health record: The Person vs. the System.隐私、同意与电子心理健康记录:个人与系统之争。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2012 Jan;18(1):46-50. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000410987.38723.47.
4
Is the biggest security threat to medical information simply a lack of understanding?对医疗信息最大的安全威胁仅仅是缺乏了解吗?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;168:179-87.
5
Display methods of electronic patient record screens: patient privacy concerns.电子病历屏幕的显示方法:患者隐私问题。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1029.
6
Cross-border flow of health information: is 'privacy by design' enough? Privacy performance assessment in EUBIROD.跨境卫生信息流动:“隐私设计”是否足够?EUBIROD 的隐私性能评估。
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Apr;23(2):247-53. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks043. Epub 2012 May 4.
7
Post-implementation: making the EHR system work for you.实施后:让电子健康记录系统为你所用。
Med Econ. 2014 Mar 10;91(5):34-6, 38-9.
8
Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases.澳大利亚成年人对保护其健康信息在统计数据库中隐私的看法。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Apr;81(4):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
9
Working with the rules. Data tagging allows selective sharing with EHRs.遵循规则。数据标记允许与电子健康记录进行选择性共享。
Mod Healthc. 2012 Sep 24;42(39):14.
10
Property rights and privacy principles.产权与隐私原则。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2000 Winter;14(4):83-93.

引用本文的文献

1
A framework for health information governance: a scoping review.健康信息治理框架:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 15;22(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01193-9.
2
Privacy of electronic health records: a review of the literature.电子健康记录的隐私性:文献综述
J Can Health Libr Assoc. 2021 Apr 2;42(1):74-84. doi: 10.29173/jchla29496. eCollection 2021 Apr.
3
Patient data and patient rights: Swiss healthcare stakeholders' ethical awareness regarding large patient data sets - a qualitative study.患者数据与患者权利:瑞士医疗保健利益相关者对大型患者数据集的伦理意识——一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Mar 7;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0261-x.