Van Dort Sandra, Coyle Julia, Wilson Linda, Ibrahim Hasherah Mohd
School of Rehabilitation Sciences (Speech Sciences), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, 50300 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Feb;15(1):90-5. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2012.757707.
The lead article by Wylie, McAllister, Davidson, and Marshall (2013) puts forward pertinent issues facing the speech-language pathology profession raised by the World Report on Disability. This paper continues the discussion by reporting on a capacity building action research study on the development, implementation, and evaluation of a new approach to early intervention speech-language pathology through clinical education in Malaysia. This research evaluated a student-led service in community-based rehabilitation that supplemented existing and more typical institution-based services. A Malaysian community-based rehabilitation project was chosen due to its emphasis on increasing the equitability and accessibility of services for people with disabilities which was a catalyst for this research. Also, expanding awareness-building, education, and training activities about communication disability was important. The intention was to provide students with experience of working in such settings, and facilitate their development as advocates for broadening the scope of practice of speech-language pathology services in Malaysia. This article focuses on the findings pertaining to the collaborative process and the learning experiences of the adult participants. Through reflection on the positive achievements, as well as some failures, it aims to provide deeper understanding of the use of such a model.
怀利、麦卡利斯特、戴维森和马歇尔（2013年）撰写的首篇文章提出了《世界残疾报告》所引发的言语语言病理学专业面临的相关问题。本文通过报告一项能力建设行动研究来延续这一讨论，该研究针对马来西亚通过临床教育开展早期干预言语语言病理学新方法的开发、实施和评估。这项研究评估了一项由学生主导的社区康复服务，该服务补充了现有的以及更典型的机构康复服务。选择马来西亚的一个社区康复项目是因为其强调提高残疾人服务的公平性和可及性，这是本研究的一个催化剂。此外，扩大关于沟通障碍的认识、教育和培训活动也很重要。目的是为学生提供在这种环境中工作的经验，并促进他们成长为倡导者，以拓宽马来西亚言语语言病理学服务的实践范围。本文重点关注与协作过程以及成年参与者学习经历相关的研究结果。通过反思积极成果以及一些失败之处，旨在更深入地理解这种模式的应用。
