Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Mar;88(3):547-51. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0628. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
The use of standardized tools for continuous quality improvement of laboratory services is crucial to identify service gaps, plan targeted interventions, and prove successes. Laboratory quality improvement tools (LQITs) were developed and applied for 18 months at five health centers and one faith-based hospital laboratories in Southwest Showa Zone in Ethiopia to assess and monitor the quality of malaria and acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy total testing processes. For the six laboratories, baseline malaria microscopy scores were 55%, 42%, 52%, 55%, 54%, and 61%. Similarly, baseline AFB microscopy scores were 49%, 41%, 46%, 58%, 44%, and 70%. On the sixth quarter for the first four laboratories and the fourth quarter for the last two laboratories, malaria microscopy scores were 89%, 88%, 88%, 90%, 88%, and 89%, whereas AFB microscopy scores were 90%, 88%, 89%, 95%, 88%, and 90%. All laboratories scored above 85% for both services at the end of interventions.
使用标准化工具持续改进实验室服务对于发现服务差距、规划有针对性的干预措施以及证明成果至关重要。在埃塞俄比亚西南部昭和区的五个卫生中心和一个信仰医院实验室中,开发并应用了实验室质量改进工具(LQITs),以评估和监测疟疾和抗酸杆菌(AFB)显微镜总检测过程的质量。对于这六个实验室,基线疟疾显微镜检查评分分别为 55%、42%、52%、55%、54%和 61%。同样,基线 AFB 显微镜检查评分分别为 49%、41%、46%、58%、44%和 70%。在前四个实验室的第六个季度和后两个实验室的第四个季度,疟疾显微镜检查评分分别为 89%、88%、88%、90%、88%和 89%,而 AFB 显微镜检查评分分别为 90%、88%、89%、95%、88%和 90%。所有实验室在干预结束时均在这两项服务中获得了 85%以上的评分。