Suppr超能文献

孟加拉国对八种砷安全饮用水选择的接受和使用。

Acceptance and use of eight arsenic-safe drinking water options in Bangladesh.

机构信息

Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science & Technology, Department of System Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling, Dübendorf, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053640. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

Abstract

Arsenic contamination of drinking water is a serious public health threat. In Bangladesh, eight major safe water options provide an alternative to contaminated shallow tubewells: piped water supply, deep tubewells, pond sand filters, community arsenic-removal, household arsenic removal, dug wells, well-sharing, and rainwater harvesting. However, it is uncertain how well these options are accepted and used by the at-risk population. Based on the RANAS model (risk, attitudes, norms, ability, and self-regulation) this study aimed to identify the acceptance and use of available safe water options. Cross-sectional face-to-face interviews were used to survey 1,268 households in Bangladesh in November 2009 (n = 872), and December 2010 (n = 396). The questionnaire assessed water consumption, acceptance factors from the RANAS model, and socioeconomic factors. Although all respondents had access to at least one arsenic-safe drinking water option, only 62.1% of participants were currently using these alternatives. The most regularly used options were household arsenic removal filters (92.9%) and piped water supply (85.6%). However, the former result may be positively biased due to high refusal rates of household filter owners. The least used option was household rainwater harvesting (36.6%). Those who reported not using an arsenic-safe source differed in terms of numerous acceptance factors from those who reported using arsenic-safe sources: non-users were characterized by greater vulnerability; showed less preference for the taste and temperature of alternative sources; found collecting safe water quite time-consuming; had lower levels of social norms, self-efficacy, and coping planning; and demonstrated lower levels of commitment to collecting safe water. Acceptance was particularly high for piped water supplies and deep tubewells, whereas dug wells and well-sharing were the least accepted sources. Intervention strategies were derived from the results in order to increase the acceptance and use of each arsenic-safe water option.

摘要

饮用水砷污染是一个严重的公共卫生威胁。在孟加拉国,有八种主要的安全水供应方式可以替代受污染的浅层管井:管道供水、深井、池塘沙滤器、社区除砷、家庭除砷、挖井、共享井和雨水收集。然而,目前还不确定这些方案在高危人群中被接受和使用的程度如何。基于 RANAS 模型(风险、态度、规范、能力和自我调节),本研究旨在确定可用安全水供应方案的接受程度和使用情况。本研究于 2009 年 11 月(n = 872)和 2010 年 12 月(n = 396)在孟加拉国进行了横断面面对面访谈调查了 1268 户家庭。问卷评估了水的消耗量、RANAS 模型的接受因素以及社会经济因素。尽管所有受访者都至少有一项砷安全饮用水选择,但只有 62.1%的参与者目前正在使用这些替代方案。最常使用的选择是家庭除砷过滤器(92.9%)和管道供水(85.6%)。然而,由于家庭过滤器拥有者的高拒绝率,这一结果可能存在正向偏差。最不常使用的选择是家庭雨水收集(36.6%)。那些报告不使用砷安全水源的人与报告使用砷安全水源的人在许多接受因素上存在差异:非使用者的脆弱性更大;对替代水源的味道和温度的偏好较小;认为收集安全水相当耗时;社会规范、自我效能和应对规划水平较低;收集安全水的承诺程度较低。对管道供水和深井的接受程度特别高,而挖井和共享井是最不受欢迎的水源。根据研究结果制定了干预策略,以提高每种砷安全水供应方案的接受度和使用率。

相似文献

4
9
A randomised intervention trial to assess two arsenic mitigation options in Bangladesh.一项评估孟加拉国两种砷减排方案的随机干预试验。
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2007 Oct;42(12):1897-908. doi: 10.1080/10934520701567197.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验