• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开卷考试:搜索行为、用时和考试成绩。

Open-book tests: search behaviour, time used and test scores.

机构信息

University of Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2013 Apr;35(4):330-2. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.759641. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2013.759641
PMID:23327562
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because of the increasing medical knowledge and the focus of medical education on acquiring competencies, the use of open-book tests seems inevitable. Dealing with a large body of information, indicating which kind of information is needed to solve a problem, and finding and understanding that knowledge at the right moment are behaviours that cannot be assessed during closed-book tests.

AIMS

To examine whether there is a relationship between students' search behaviour - using references or not when answering a question - during open-book tests and their test scores.

METHOD

Second- (N = 491) and third-year medical students (N = 325) participated in this study. Search behaviour was operationalized as the number of questions for which students consulted their references. Furthermore, we collected data on the time students spent on answering all open-book questions and their test scores. To determine the relations, we calculated Spearman's and Pearson's correlations.

RESULTS

Second- and third-year students consulted their references for 87% and 73% of the questions and spent 5.0 and 4.3 min on answering an open-book question, respectively. We did not find significant correlations between search behaviour and test scores.

CONCLUSION

Both 'well' and 'poorer performing' students often consulted their references. Spending almost 5 min per open-book question in multiple choice format seems to be too much. More research is needed to establish optimal open-book test time and to explore how 'well performing' students use their references during open-book tests.

摘要

背景

由于医学知识的不断增加以及医学教育注重培养能力,开卷考试似乎不可避免。处理大量信息,指出解决问题所需的信息类型,以及在正确的时刻找到和理解知识,这些行为都无法在闭卷考试中进行评估。

目的

检验学生在开卷考试中回答问题时是否会根据需要查阅参考资料,以及他们的考试成绩与这种行为之间是否存在相关性。

方法

共有 491 名二年级和 325 名三年级医学生参与了这项研究。查阅参考资料的行为通过学生查阅参考资料的问题数量来操作化。此外,我们还收集了学生回答所有开卷问题所用的时间以及他们的考试成绩的数据。为了确定这些关系,我们计算了 Spearman 和 Pearson 相关系数。

结果

二年级和三年级学生在 87%和 73%的问题上查阅了参考资料,分别花费 5.0 和 4.3 分钟来回答一个开卷问题。我们没有发现查阅参考资料的行为与考试成绩之间存在显著相关性。

结论

无论是表现“好”的还是“差”的学生,他们都经常查阅参考资料。在多项选择题格式下,每个开卷问题花费近 5 分钟似乎太多了。需要进一步研究来确定最佳的开卷考试时间,并探索表现“好”的学生在开卷考试中如何使用参考资料。

相似文献

1
Open-book tests: search behaviour, time used and test scores.开卷考试:搜索行为、用时和考试成绩。
Med Teach. 2013 Apr;35(4):330-2. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.759641. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
2
Directing students to profound open-book test preparation: the relationship between deep learning and open-book test time.引导学生进行深入的开卷考试准备:深度学习与开卷考试时间的关系。
Med Teach. 2011;33(1):e16-21. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.530315.
3
Influence of open- and closed-book tests on medical students' learning approaches.开卷考试和闭卷考试对医学生学习方法的影响。
Med Educ. 2008 Oct;42(10):967-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03125.x.
4
Influences of deep learning, need for cognition and preparation time on open- and closed-book test performance.深度学习、认知需求和准备时间对开卷和闭卷考试表现的影响。
Med Educ. 2010 Sep;44(9):884-891. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03732.x.
5
Open book tests: assessment of academic learning in clerkships.开卷考试:临床实习中学术学习的评估
Med Teach. 2005 Aug;27(5):456-62. doi: 10.1080/01421590500097075.
6
Open-book tests to complement assessment-programmes: analysis of open and closed-book tests.开卷考试以补充评估方案:开卷考试与闭卷考试的分析
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Aug;13(3):263-73. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9038-y. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
7
Open-book tests and student-authored exam questions as useful tools to increase critical thinking.开卷考试和学生自主编写的考试题目是培养批判性思维的有用工具。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2005 Sep;29(3):183-4. doi: 10.1152/advan.00024.2005.
8
A comparative study of students' performance in preclinical physiology assessed by multiple choice and short essay questions.一项关于通过多项选择题和短文问题评估学生临床前生理学表现的比较研究。
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2000 Sep-Dec;29(3-4):201-5.
9
Expectancy of an open-book test decreases performance on a delayed closed-book test.开卷考试的预期会降低延时闭卷考试的表现。
Memory. 2011 Nov;19(8):836-52. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.613840. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
10
Comparing narrative and multiple-choice formats in online communication skill assessment.在线沟通技巧评估中比较叙事和多项选择格式。
Med Educ. 2009 Jun;43(6):533-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03368.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Transition from Closed-Book to Open-Book Assessment on Students' Scores in a Pharmacokinetics Course.从闭卷考试转变为开卷考试对药代动力学课程中学生成绩的影响。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Aug 23;11(5):134. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11050134.
2
Assessment during Covid-19: quality assurance of an online open book formative examination for undergraduate medical students.新冠疫情期间的评估:本科医学生在线开卷形成性考试的质量保证。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 15;22(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03849-y.