• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳果糖预防口服吗啡所致便秘的临床观察

[Clinical observation of prophylactic lactulose for prevention of oral morphine-induced constipation].

作者信息

Wang Zhan, Qian Jian-Xin, Jiao Xiao-Dong, Yuan Ling-Yan, Xiao Ming, Gu Xiao-Qiang, Lou Cheng, Wang Miao-Miao, Lan Hai-Feng

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Nov 13;92(42):2968-71. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2012.42.005.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2012.42.005
PMID:23328286
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of different doses of lactulose on preventing oral morphine-induced constipation.

METHODS

From January 2011 to May 2012, a total of 112 patients received oral lactulose solution to prevent morphine-induced constipation at our hospital and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. The doses of morphine were adjusted according to the pain scores and lactulose was taken simultaneously. There were 52 males and 60 females. They were randomized into Group 30 ml/d (n = 40), Group 60 ml/d (n = 43) and Group 90 ml/d (n = 29). The incidences of constipation and adverse reactions were obtained at 1 week after the start of medicine. The measurement data were analyzed with analysis of variance. And the enumeration data were analyzed with χ(2), Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

The incidence of constipation was 67.5% (27/40) in Group 30 ml/d, 46.5% (20/43) in Group 60 ml/d, and 37.9% (11/29) in Group 90 ml/d. And there were statistical differences (P = 0.036). The incidence of constipation in Group 30 ml was significantly higher than Group 90 ml/d (P = 0.015). No statistical difference existed in the incidence of constipation between Groups 30 ml/d and 60 ml/d (P = 0.054) or Groups 60 ml/d and 90 ml/d (P = 0.471). The incidence of vomiting was 34.5% (10/29) in Group 90 ml/d and it was significantly higher than 10.0% (4/40) in Group 30 ml/d (P = 0.013) and 9.3% (4/43) in Group 60 ml/d (P = 0.009). No statistical difference existed in the incidence of vomiting between Groups 30 ml/d and 60 ml/d (P = 0.915). The incidence of diarrhea was 17.2% (5/29) in Group 90 ml/d and it was significantly higher than 0 (0/40) in Group 30 ml/d (P = 0.007). No statistical difference existed in the incidence of diarrhea between Groups 30 ml/d and 60 ml/d (4.7% (2/43), P = 0.170) or Groups 60 ml/d and 90 ml/d (P = 0.072).

CONCLUSION

The correct dosage of lactulose for the prevention of oral morphine-induced constipation is 60 ml/d.

摘要

目的

评估不同剂量乳果糖预防口服吗啡所致便秘的效果。

方法

回顾性分析2011年1月至2012年5月在我院接受口服乳果糖溶液预防吗啡所致便秘的112例患者的临床资料。根据疼痛评分调整吗啡剂量,同时服用乳果糖。其中男性52例,女性60例。随机分为30 ml/d组(n = 40)、60 ml/d组(n = 43)和90 ml/d组(n = 29)。于用药1周后统计便秘及不良反应发生率。计量资料采用方差分析,计数资料采用χ(2)检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验。

结果

30 ml/d组便秘发生率为67.5%(27/40),60 ml/d组为46.5%(20/43),90 ml/d组为37.9%(11/29),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.036)。30 ml组便秘发生率显著高于90 ml/d组(P = 0.015)。30 ml/d组与60 ml/d组便秘发生率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.054),60 ml/d组与90 ml/d组便秘发生率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.471)。90 ml/d组呕吐发生率为34.5%(10/29),显著高于30 ml/d组的10.0%(4/40)(P = 0.013)和60 ml/d组的9.3%(4/43)(P = 0.009)。30 ml/d组与60 ml/d组呕吐发生率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.915)。90 ml/d组腹泻发生率为17.2%(5/29),显著高于30 ml/d组的0(0/40)(P = 0.007)。30 ml/d组与60 ml/d组腹泻发生率差异无统计学意义(4.7%(2/43),P = 0.170),60 ml/d组与90 ml/d组腹泻发生率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.072)。

结论

预防口服吗啡所致便秘的乳果糖正确剂量为60 ml/d。

相似文献

1
[Clinical observation of prophylactic lactulose for prevention of oral morphine-induced constipation].乳果糖预防口服吗啡所致便秘的临床观察
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Nov 13;92(42):2968-71. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2012.42.005.
2
[Lactulose plus live binary Bacillus subtilis in the treatment of elders with functional constipation].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Nov 13;92(42):2961-4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2012.42.003.
3
[Effects of lactulose treatment on the course of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy].乳果糖治疗对亚临床肝性脑病病程的影响
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Jul 10;83(13):1126-9.
4
[Efficacies of lactulose plus live combined Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium capsules in the treatment of functional constipation: a multicenter, randomized, double blind, controlled trial].乳果糖联合枯草芽孢杆菌和屎肠球菌活菌胶囊治疗功能性便秘的疗效:一项多中心、随机、双盲、对照试验
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Nov 13;92(42):2955-60. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2012.42.002.
5
A multi-institutional study analyzing effect of prophylactic medication for prevention of opioid-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction.一项多机构研究分析了预防用药对预防阿片类药物引起的胃肠道功能障碍的效果。
Clin J Pain. 2012 Jun;28(5):373-81. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318237d626.
6
Intravenous morphine can avoid distressing constipation associated with oral morphine: a retrospective analysis of our experience in 11 patients in the palliative care in-patient unit.静脉注射吗啡可避免口服吗啡引起的令人痛苦的便秘:对我们在姑息治疗住院单元11例患者中的经验进行的回顾性分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008 Aug-Sep;25(4):282-4. doi: 10.1177/1049909108315913.
7
Laxative management in ambulatory cancer patients on opioid therapy: a prospective, open-label investigation of polyethylene glycol, sodium picosulphate and lactulose.门诊癌症患者阿片类药物治疗时的泻药管理:聚乙二醇、磷酸钠盐和乳果糖的前瞻性、开放标签研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012 Jan;21(1):131-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01286.x. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
8
[Effects of sustained release morphine hydrochloride tablets in management of cancer pain: a survey of 567 patients].[盐酸吗啡缓释片治疗癌痛的效果:567例患者的调查]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Mar 17;84(6):450-5.
9
[Morphine tablets for chronic non-tumor-induced pain. Which factors modify the success or failure of a long-term therapy?].[用于慢性非肿瘤性疼痛的吗啡片。哪些因素会影响长期治疗的成败?]
Anaesthesist. 1993 Aug;42(8):545-56.
10
Prospective randomized crossover trial comparing fibre with lactulose in the treatment of idiopathic chronic constipation.比较纤维与乳果糖治疗特发性慢性便秘的前瞻性随机交叉试验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2006 Jul;10(2):111-4. doi: 10.1007/s10151-006-0262-5. Epub 2006 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The Efficacy and Safety of Transcutaneous Acupoint Interferential Current Stimulation for Cancer Pain Patients With Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.经皮穴位干扰电刺激对阿片类药物所致便秘的癌症疼痛患者的疗效及安全性:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2018 Jun;17(2):437-443. doi: 10.1177/1534735417734910. Epub 2017 Oct 27.