Department of Public Health, Ghent University, University Hospital, (2) Block A, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2013 Mar;28(3):241-7. doi: 10.1007/s10654-013-9764-4. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
The interplay of occupational and leisure time physical activity (LTPA) in affecting cardiovascular health is subject to debate. This study aimed to examine the independent and interacting associations of leisure time and occupational physical activity (OPA) with the incidence of coronary events within the BELSTRESS cohort. The study included 14,337 middle-aged men free from coronary heart disease at baseline. Standardized questionnaires and clinical examinations were used to assess socio-demographic factors, level of physical activity, job strain and classical coronary risk factors. The incidence of clinical coronary events was monitored during a mean follow-up time of 3.15 years. Results demonstrated overall a beneficial relation of LTPA and an adverse relation of physical work demands with cardiovascular health. However, an interaction effect between both physical activity types was observed, showing that men with high physical job demands who also engaged in physical activity during leisure time had an almost four times increased incidence of coronary events after adjusting for socio-demographic and classical coronary risk factors (HR 3.82; 95% CI 1.41-10.36). Stratified analyses revealed that moderate to high physical activity during leisure time was associated with a 60% reduced incidence rate of coronary events in men with low OPA (age adjusted HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.21-0.76), while this protective association was not observed in workers being exposed to high physical work demands (age adjusted HR 1.67; 95% CI 0.63-4.48). These findings suggest that recommendations regarding LTPA should be tailored according to the level of occupational physical activity.
职业和休闲时间体力活动(LTPA)在影响心血管健康方面的相互作用仍存在争议。本研究旨在检验 BELSTRESS 队列中休闲时间和职业体力活动(OPA)与冠心病事件发生的独立和交互关联。该研究纳入了 14337 名基线时无冠心病的中年男性。采用标准化问卷和临床检查评估社会人口因素、体力活动水平、工作压力和经典冠心病危险因素。在平均 3.15 年的随访期间监测临床冠心病事件的发生率。结果表明,LTPA 整体呈有益关系,体力工作需求呈不利关系,但两种体力活动类型之间存在交互作用,表明高体力工作需求的男性如果在闲暇时间也进行体力活动,那么在调整社会人口和经典冠心病危险因素后,冠心病事件的发生率几乎增加了四倍(HR 3.82;95%CI 1.41-10.36)。分层分析显示,中等至高强度的闲暇时间体力活动与低 OPA 男性冠心病事件发生率降低 60%相关(年龄调整 HR 0.40;95%CI 0.21-0.76),而在高体力工作需求的工人中未观察到这种保护关联(年龄调整 HR 1.67;95%CI 0.63-4.48)。这些发现表明,针对 LTPA 的建议应根据职业体力活动水平进行调整。