• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残疾养老金领取者福利资格的普遍标准:结构和文化因素的影响。

Popular Criteria for the Welfare Deservingness of Disability Pensioners: The Influence of Structural and Cultural Factors.

作者信息

Jeene Marjolein, van Oorschot Wim, Uunk Wilfred

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Soc Indic Res. 2013 Feb;110(3):1103-1117. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9974-7. Epub 2011 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1007/s11205-011-9974-7
PMID:23329864
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3545196/
Abstract

Research has shown that several criteria underlie people's opinions about the welfare deservingness of benefit recipients. However, it remains unknown which factors are associated with the emphasis that people place on such criteria. Using a 2006 Dutch national survey on the welfare deservingness of disability pension recipients, we study the influence of structural and cultural factors on people's emphasis on three deservingness criteria: control, need, and reciprocity. OLS regression analyses show that people's emphasis on specific deservingness criteria is strengthened by structural factors that indicate the possibility of resource competition such as the following: age, lower levels of education, unemployment, and lower income. However, actual personal experience with receiving welfare benefits weakens criteria emphasis. Cultural factors such as the espousal of views from the political right and the possession of a strong work ethic are associated with a heightened emphasis on deservingness criteria.

摘要

研究表明,人们对福利领取者应得福利的看法有几个标准作为依据。然而,人们对这些标准的重视程度与哪些因素相关仍不清楚。我们利用2006年荷兰关于残疾养老金领取者应得福利的全国性调查,研究结构和文化因素对人们对三个应得福利标准(控制、需求和互惠)的重视程度的影响。普通最小二乘法回归分析表明,表明资源竞争可能性的结构因素,如年龄、教育程度较低、失业和收入较低,会加强人们对特定应得福利标准的重视。然而,实际领取福利的个人经历会削弱对标准的重视。文化因素,如支持政治右派观点和拥有强烈的职业道德,与对应得福利标准的更高重视程度相关。

相似文献

1
Popular Criteria for the Welfare Deservingness of Disability Pensioners: The Influence of Structural and Cultural Factors.残疾养老金领取者福利资格的普遍标准:结构和文化因素的影响。
Soc Indic Res. 2013 Feb;110(3):1103-1117. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9974-7. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
2
Welfare deservingness opinions from heuristic to measurable concept: The CARIN deservingness principles scale.从启发式概念到可衡量概念的福利资格意见:CARIN 福利资格原则量表。
Soc Sci Res. 2020 Jan;85:102352. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102352. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
3
Disabled but not deserving? The perceived deservingness of disability welfare benefit claimants.残疾却不应得?残疾福利金申领者的应得感认知
J Eur Soc Policy. 2021 Jul;31(3):337-351. doi: 10.1177/0958928721996652. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
Deservingness put into practice: Constructing the (un)deservingness of migrants in four European countries.实施中的应得感:构建四个欧洲国家移民的(应得与不应得)。
Br J Sociol. 2020 Jan;71(1):112-126. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12721.
5
Who deserves what and why during the COVID-19 pandemic: Applying the CARIN principles of deservingness to the American welfare state.在新冠疫情期间谁应得什么以及为何应得:将应得性的关爱原则应用于美国福利国家
Soc Policy Adm. 2022 Sep 6. doi: 10.1111/spol.12859.
6
A Recast Framework for Welfare Deservingness Perceptions.一个关于应得福利感知的重塑框架。
Soc Indic Res. 2022;159(3):927-943. doi: 10.1007/s11205-021-02774-9. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
7
Getting what you deserve: How notions of deservingness feature in the experiences of employees with cancer.得到应得的:应得观念如何影响癌症员工的体验。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Sep;237:112447. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112447. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
8
[Fluctuations in unemployment and disability in Iceland 1992-2006].[1992 - 2006年冰岛失业率与残疾率的波动情况]
Laeknabladid. 2008 Mar;94(3):193-8.
9
Citizenship deservingness justifies exclusive national boundary making: A socio-dynamic mixed-methods approach to social representations of citizenship.公民资格应得性为排他性国界划分提供了正当理由:一种关于公民资格社会表征的社会动态混合方法。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62(1):84-103. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12586. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
10
[Educational level, occupation and income of those who became disability pensioners in Iceland in the year 1997.].[1997年冰岛成为残疾抚恤金领取者的人群的教育程度、职业和收入情况。]
Laeknabladid. 2001 Dec;87(12):981-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Settlement deservingness perceptions of climate change, economic, and political migrant groups across partisan lines.跨党派的气候变化移民群体、经济移民群体和政治移民群体应得安置的认知。
Front Sociol. 2025 Jan 30;10:1510672. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1510672. eCollection 2025.
2
The Legality of Labor and Perceptions of Deservingness of Rights and Services for Sex Workers.性工作者的劳动合法性和权利与服务应得感的认知。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Oct;53(9):3609-3624. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02951-0. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
3
Disabled but not deserving? The perceived deservingness of disability welfare benefit claimants.残疾却不应得?残疾福利金申领者的应得感认知
J Eur Soc Policy. 2021 Jul;31(3):337-351. doi: 10.1177/0958928721996652. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
The perceived deservingness of COVID-19 healthcare in the Netherlands: a conjoint experiment on priority access to intensive care and vaccination.荷兰对新冠肺炎医疗保健的感知应得性:关于重症监护和疫苗接种优先获取的联合实验
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 5;21(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10488-3.
5
The Social Norm to Work and the Well-Being of the Short- and Long-Term Unemployed.工作的社会规范与短期和长期失业者的幸福感。
Soc Indic Res. 2018;139(3):1037-1064. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1723-0. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
6
Varying Opinions on Who Deserves Collectively Financed Health Care Services: A Discrete Choice Experiment on Allocation Preferences of the General Public.关于谁应获得集体资助的医疗保健服务的不同观点:一项关于公众分配偏好的离散选择实验
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958017751981. doi: 10.1177/0046958017751981.