Bradshaw Matt, Ellison Christopher G, Marcum Jack P
Carolina Population Center.
Int J Psychol Relig. 2010;20(2):130-147. doi: 10.1080/10508611003608049.
Drawing broadly on insights from attachment theory, the present study outlines a series of theoretical arguments linking styles of attachment to God, perceptions of the nature of God (i.e., God imagery), and stressful life events with psychological distress. Main effects and potential stress-moderator effects are then evaluated using data from a nationwide sample of elders and rank-and-file members of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). Key findings indicate that secure attachment to God is inversely associated with distress, whereas both anxious attachment to God and stressful life events are positively related to distress. Once variations in patterns of attachment to God are controlled, there are no net effects of God imagery on levels of distress. There is only modest support for the hypothesis that God images moderate the effects of stressful life events on psychological distress, but no stress-moderator effects were found for attachment to God. Study limitations are identified, and findings are discussed in terms of their implications for religion-health research, as well as recent extensions of attachment theory.
本研究广泛借鉴依恋理论的见解,概述了一系列理论观点,将对上帝的依恋风格、对上帝本质的认知(即上帝意象)以及压力性生活事件与心理困扰联系起来。然后,利用来自美国长老会全国范围内的老年人和普通成员样本的数据,评估了主效应和潜在的压力调节效应。主要研究结果表明,对上帝的安全依恋与困扰呈负相关,而对上帝的焦虑依恋和压力性生活事件均与困扰呈正相关。一旦控制了对上帝的依恋模式差异,上帝意象对困扰水平就没有净效应。对于上帝意象调节压力性生活事件对心理困扰影响的假设,仅有适度的支持,但未发现对上帝的依恋存在压力调节效应。研究指出了局限性,并根据研究结果对宗教与健康研究以及依恋理论的最新扩展的意义进行了讨论。