Kirkpatrick L A, Davis K E
Department of Psychology, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187-8795.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Mar;66(3):502-12. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.3.502.
Adult attachment styles in 354 heterosexual couples in serious dating relationships were examined. Principal findings included the following: (a) male and female attachment styles were nonrandomly paired, for example, no anxious-anxious or avoidant-avoidant pairs were found; (b) male and female styles related to concurrent relationship ratings of both partners in different but theoretically meaningful ways; (c) male and female styles contributed significantly to longitudinal prediction of relationship stability and status, even when prior duration and commitment to the relationship were statistically controlled; (d) specifically, relationships of avoidant men and of anxious women were surprisingly stable over 3 years, particularly in light of the relatively poor ratings of these relationships by both partners at Time 1. Discussion focuses on the need to integrate gender role considerations and relationship dynamics and processes into theorizing on adult attachment.
对354对处于认真恋爱关系中的异性恋情侣的成人依恋风格进行了研究。主要研究结果如下:(a) 男性和女性的依恋风格并非随机配对,例如,未发现焦虑-焦虑或回避-回避型的配对;(b) 男性和女性的依恋风格以不同但理论上有意义的方式与双方同时期的关系评价相关;(c) 即使在对恋爱关系的持续时间和投入程度进行了统计学控制之后,男性和女性的依恋风格对恋爱关系稳定性和状态的纵向预测仍有显著贡献;(d) 具体而言,回避型男性和焦虑型女性的恋爱关系在3年中惊人地稳定,尤其是考虑到双方在时间1时对这些关系的评价相对较差。讨论集中在将性别角色考量以及关系动态和过程纳入成人依恋理论的必要性上。