Suppr超能文献

使用伽利略双倾斜摄影分析仪评估亚临床圆锥角膜和圆锥角膜患者的角膜高度

Evaluation of corneal elevation in eyes with subclinical keratoconus and keratoconus using Galilei double Scheimpflug analyzer.

作者信息

Jafarinasab Mohammad Reza, Feizi Sepehr, Karimian Farid, Hasanpour Hossein

机构信息

Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013 May-Jun;23(3):377-84. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000226. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To measure corneal elevations in eyes with subclinical keratoconus and those with keratoconus using the Galilei Scheimpflug analyzer and to determine the optimal corneal elevation cutoff points to maximize sensitivity and specificity in discriminating keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus from normal corneas.

METHODS

A total of 136 normal eyes, 23 eyes with subclinical keratoconus, and 51 eyes with keratoconus were enrolled. Maximum anterior and posterior corneal elevation was measured in the central 3-, 5-, and 7-mm zones using the Galilei double Scheimpflug camera. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the measured parameters and to identify optimal cutoff points for discriminating keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus from normal corneas.

RESULTS

Mean anterior and posterior corneal elevations in all zones were statistically higher in keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus versus normal corneas. The posterior elevation measurement in the 3-mm zone had the strongest power to distinguish keratoconus from normal. The corresponding figure for the 7-mm zone, however, had the strongest power to distinguish eyes with subclinical keratoconus (area under the curve, 0.98 and 0.92, respectively). Optimal cutoff point for posterior elevation in the 3-mm zone was 18.5 µm for keratoconus (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 95%). The corresponding figure in the 7-mm zone was 50.5 µm for subclinical keratoconus (sensitivity, 79.9%; specificity, 94.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior and posterior elevations measured by the Galilei analyzer in the 3-mm zone can effectively discriminate keratoconus from normal corneas. These measurements in the 7-mm zone can be considered to distinguish subclinical keratoconus.

摘要

目的

使用伽利略(Galilei)旋转棱镜分析仪测量亚临床圆锥角膜患者和圆锥角膜患者的角膜高度,并确定最佳角膜高度截断点,以最大限度地提高鉴别圆锥角膜和亚临床圆锥角膜与正常角膜的敏感性和特异性。

方法

共纳入136只正常眼、23只亚临床圆锥角膜眼和51只圆锥角膜眼。使用伽利略双旋转棱镜相机测量中央3mm、5mm和7mm区域的最大角膜前表面和后表面高度。采用受试者操作特征曲线比较测量参数的敏感性和特异性,并确定鉴别圆锥角膜和亚临床圆锥角膜与正常角膜的最佳截断点。

结果

与正常角膜相比,圆锥角膜和亚临床圆锥角膜所有区域的角膜前表面和后表面平均高度在统计学上更高。3mm区域的后表面高度测量区分圆锥角膜与正常角膜的能力最强。然而,7mm区域的相应测量区分亚临床圆锥角膜眼的能力最强(曲线下面积分别为0.98和0.92)。圆锥角膜在3mm区域后表面高度的最佳截断点为18.5μm(敏感性92%;特异性95%)。亚临床圆锥角膜在7mm区域的相应截断点为50.5μm(敏感性79.9%;特异性94.0%)。

结论

伽利略分析仪测量的3mm区域角膜前表面和后表面高度可有效鉴别圆锥角膜与正常角膜。7mm区域的这些测量可用于鉴别亚临床圆锥角膜。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验