• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 Galilei 双重平面角膜断层扫描仪对正常角膜和圆锥角膜进行比较。

Comparison of normal and keratoconic corneas by Galilei Dual-Scheimpflug Analyzer.

机构信息

Departments of Ophthalmology, Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of Medicine, Tokat, Turkey.

出版信息

Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013 Oct;36(5):219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.clae.2013.04.001
PMID:23642799
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of different Galilei Scheimpflug-Analyzer (GSA) parameters in discriminating between keratoconic and myopic eyes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

GSA measurements were obtained for 67 patients (67 eyes) with keratoconus and 151 patients (151 eyes) with myopia or myopic astigmatism. Several parameters, provided by the software or derived from the elevation maps, were evaluated and compared for the two groups.

RESULTS

Between the two groups, statistically significant differences were observed for all corneal parameters obtained by GSA (P<0.001) except for the anterior chamber depth (P=0.149). ROC analysis determined that posterior corneal elevation was the best predictive parameter (area under the curve: 0.99). The posterior corneal elevation, at a cut-off value of 18.5μm, had 98.5% sensitivity and 98.3% specificity in discriminating keratoconus from myopic eyes.

CONCLUSION

Elevation, pachymetric and keratometric parameters measured by the GSA, as well as the specific predictive GSA software parameters can effectively distinguish advanced keratoconus from myopic corneas. Also, keratoconus that is easily diagnosed by other means can be diagnosed easily by GSA software parameters.

摘要

背景与目的

确定不同的 Galilei Scheimpflug 分析仪(GSA)参数在区分圆锥角膜和近视眼中的功效。

患者与方法

对 67 例圆锥角膜患者(67 只眼)和 151 例近视或近视散光患者(151 只眼)进行 GSA 测量。评估并比较了两组的几种由软件提供或从高度图中得出的参数。

结果

两组之间,所有由 GSA 获得的角膜参数均存在统计学显著差异(P<0.001),除前房深度(P=0.149)外。ROC 分析确定,后表面角膜高度是最佳预测参数(曲线下面积:0.99)。在后表面角膜高度的截断值为 18.5μm 时,区分圆锥角膜与近视眼的敏感性为 98.5%,特异性为 98.3%。

结论

GSA 测量的高度、厚度和角膜曲率参数以及 GSA 软件的特定预测参数可有效区分进展期圆锥角膜与近视角膜。此外,通过其他手段容易诊断的圆锥角膜也可以通过 GSA 软件参数轻松诊断。

相似文献

1
Comparison of normal and keratoconic corneas by Galilei Dual-Scheimpflug Analyzer.使用 Galilei 双重平面角膜断层扫描仪对正常角膜和圆锥角膜进行比较。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013 Oct;36(5):219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
2
Evaluation of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation parameters of keratoconic corneas with pentacam.应用 pentacam 评估圆锥角膜的角膜曲率、厚度和高度参数。
Cornea. 2009 Oct;28(9):976-80. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31819e34de.
3
Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus.用于区分正常角膜、亚临床圆锥角膜和圆锥角膜的参考表面形状的影响。
J Refract Surg. 2013 Apr;29(4):274-81. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130318-07.
4
Comparison of three-dimensional optical coherence tomography and combining a rotating Scheimpflug camera with a Placido topography system for forme fruste keratoconus diagnosis.三种光学相干断层扫描技术与旋转 Scheimpflug 相机联合 Placido 角膜地形图系统在诊断亚临床圆锥角膜中的比较。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;97(12):1554-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303477. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
5
Evaluation of corneal elevation in eyes with subclinical keratoconus and keratoconus using Galilei double Scheimpflug analyzer.使用伽利略双倾斜摄影分析仪评估亚临床圆锥角膜和圆锥角膜患者的角膜高度
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013 May-Jun;23(3):377-84. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000226. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
6
Mapping corneal thickness using dual-scheimpflug imaging at different stages of keratoconus.利用角膜共焦显微镜在圆锥角膜不同阶段测量角膜厚度。
Cornea. 2013 Nov;32(11):1470-4. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a7387f.
7
Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas.薄的非圆锥角膜、亚临床圆锥角膜和轻度圆锥角膜之间的Scheimpflug断层扫描参数的比较评估
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;28(5):521-534. doi: 10.1177/1120672118760146. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
8
Combining ocular response analyzer metrics for corneal biomechanical diagnosis.联合眼反应分析仪指标进行角膜生物力学诊断。
J Refract Surg. 2013 Sep;29(9):596-602. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130710-01. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
9
Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging parameters in subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, and normal eyes.评价亚临床圆锥角膜、圆锥角膜和正常眼中的 Scheimpflug 成像参数。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jun;37(6):1116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.12.049.
10
Repeatability and reproducibility of Galilei measurements in normal keratoconic and postrefractive corneas.Galilei测量在正常角膜、圆锥角膜和屈光手术后角膜中的可重复性和再现性。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014 Oct;37(5):331-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Multimodal diagnostics for keratoconus and ectatic corneal diseases: a paradigm shift.圆锥角膜和扩张性角膜疾病的多模态诊断:范式转变
Eye Vis (Lond). 2023 Nov 3;10(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40662-023-00363-0.
2
Changes in Corneal Morphology and Biomechanics in Cases of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction with Prophylactic Accelerated Collagen Cross-Linking.预防性加速胶原交联的小切口透镜切除术病例中角膜形态和生物力学的变化
J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 11;2022:1640249. doi: 10.1155/2022/1640249. eCollection 2022.
3
Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION.
双 Scheimpflug 分析仪、GALILEI G6 和扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪 ANTERION 的眼部生物测量学临床评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 4;12(1):3602. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07696-1.
4
Comparison of Anterior Chamber Depth between Normal and Keratoconic Eyes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.正常眼与圆锥角膜眼的前房深度比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 23;32(1):94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2019.01.010. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
5
Galilei Corneal Tomography for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part II.用于屈光手术候选者筛查的伽利略角膜地形图:文献综述,第二部分
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2019 Fall;8(3):204-218.
6
Comparison of anterior segment measurements obtained by three different devices in healthy eyes.三种不同设备在健康眼中获得的眼前节测量值的比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:498080. doi: 10.1155/2014/498080. Epub 2014 Jun 2.