Department of Psychology, Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University–New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan;5(1):13-34. doi: 10.1111/tops.12003.
The idea that perceptual and cognitive systems must incorporate knowledge about the structure of the environment has become a central dogma of cognitive theory. In a Bayesian context, this idea is often realized in terms of "tuning the prior"-widely assumed to mean adjusting prior probabilities so that they match the frequencies of events in the world. This kind of "ecological" tuning has often been held up as an ideal of inference, in fact defining an "ideal observer." But widespread as this viewpoint is, it directly contradicts Bayesian philosophy of probability, which views probabilities as degrees of belief rather than relative frequencies, and explicitly denies that they are objective characteristics of the world. Moreover, tuning the prior to observed environmental frequencies is subject to overfitting, meaning in this context overtuning to the environment, which leads (ironically) to poor performance in future encounters with the same environment. Whenever there is uncertainty about the environment-which there almost always is-an agent's prior should be biased away from ecological relative frequencies and toward simpler and more entropic priors.
认为感知和认知系统必须包含有关环境结构的知识,这已成为认知理论的核心教条。在贝叶斯语境中,这个想法通常以“调整先验”来实现——广泛认为是指调整先验概率,使其与世界事件的频率相匹配。这种“生态”调整经常被视为推理的理想模式,实际上定义了“理想观察者”。但是,尽管这种观点很普遍,但它直接违背了贝叶斯概率哲学,后者将概率视为置信度而不是相对频率,并明确否认它们是世界的客观特征。此外,将先验调整为观察到的环境频率容易产生过拟合,这意味着在这种情况下,对环境的过度调整会导致(具有讽刺意味的是)在未来遇到相同环境时表现不佳。只要对环境存在不确定性——几乎总是如此——代理人的先验就应该偏向于简单和更具熵的先验,而不是偏向于生态相对频率。