School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054497. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
A large-scale subjective survey was conducted in six shopping malls in Harbin City, China, to determine the influence of social and behavioural characteristics of users on their evaluation of subjective loudness and acoustic comfort. The analysis of social characteristics shows that evaluation of subjective loudness is influenced by income and occupation, with correlation coefficients or contingency coefficients of 0.10 to 0.40 (p<0.05 or p<0.01). Meanwhile, evaluation of acoustic comfort evaluation is influenced by income, education level, and occupation, with correlation coefficients or contingency coefficients of 0.10 to 0.60 (p<0.05 or p<0.01). The effect of gender and age on evaluation of subjective loudness and acoustic comfort is statistically insignificant. The effects of occupation are mainly caused by the differences in income and education level, in which the effects of income are greater than that of education level. In terms of behavioural characteristics, evaluation of subjective loudness is influenced by the reason for visit, frequency of visit, and length of stay, with correlation coefficients or contingency coefficients of 0.10 to 0.40 (p<0.05 or p<0.01). Evaluation of acoustic comfort is influenced by the reason for visit to the site, the frequency of visit, length of stay, and also season of visit, with correlation coefficients of 0.10 to 0.30 (p<0.05 or p<0.01). In particular, users who are waiting for someone show lower evaluation of acoustic comfort, whereas users who go to shopping malls more than once a month show higher evaluation of acoustic comfort. On the contrary, the influence of the period of visit and the accompanying persons are found insignificant.
在中国哈尔滨市的六个购物中心进行了大规模的主观调查,以确定用户的社会和行为特征对其主观响度和声学舒适度评价的影响。社会特征分析表明,评价主观响度受收入和职业的影响,相关系数或列联系数为 0.10 到 0.40(p<0.05 或 p<0.01)。同时,评价声学舒适度评价受收入、教育水平和职业的影响,相关系数或列联系数为 0.10 到 0.60(p<0.05 或 p<0.01)。性别和年龄对主观响度和声学舒适度评价的影响在统计学上不显著。职业的影响主要是由于收入和教育水平的差异造成的,其中收入的影响大于教育水平的影响。就行为特征而言,评价主观响度受访问原因、访问频率和停留时间的影响,相关系数或列联系数为 0.10 到 0.40(p<0.05 或 p<0.01)。评价声学舒适度受访问场所的原因、访问频率、停留时间以及访问季节的影响,相关系数为 0.10 到 0.30(p<0.05 或 p<0.01)。特别是,等待某人的用户对声学舒适度的评价较低,而每月去购物中心超过一次的用户对声学舒适度的评价较高。相反,访问期和陪同人员的影响不显著。