Universitat de València, Spain.
Psicothema. 2013 Feb;25(1):13-7. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2012.141.
The publication norms of the American Psychological Association recommend the use of a serif font in the manuscripts (Times New Roman). However, there seems to be no well-substantiated reason why serif fonts would produce any advantage during letter/word processing.
This study presents an experiment in which sentences were presented either with a serif or sans serif font from the same family while participants' eye movements were monitored.
Results did not reveal any differences of type of font in eye movement measures -except for a minimal effect in the number of progressive saccades.
There is no reason why the APA publication norms recommend the use of serif fonts other than uniformity in the elaboration/presentation of the manuscripts.
美国心理协会的出版规范建议在稿件中使用衬线字体(Times New Roman)。然而,似乎没有充分的理由说明衬线字体在字母/单词处理过程中会有任何优势。
本研究进行了一项实验,参与者在观看句子时,句子分别使用同一字体族的衬线字体或无衬线字体,同时监测他们的眼动。
结果并未显示字体类型在眼动测量方面有任何差异——除了在递进扫视次数上有一个微小的影响。
美国心理协会的出版规范除了在稿件的阐述/呈现上保持一致性之外,没有任何理由推荐使用衬线字体。