Kaspar Kai, Wehlitz Thea, von Knobelsdorff Sara, Wulf Tim, von Saldern Marie Antoinette Oktavie
Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Int J Psychol. 2015 Oct;50(5):372-8. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12160. Epub 2015 Feb 22.
Text-based communication is one of the substantial ways of spreading scientific information. While the content and contextual aspects of written words have been widely researched, the impact of font characteristics on text perception is an almost blank page. The following study deals with the influence of serifs on the evaluation of online-presented scientific abstracts. Yet there is only evidence for faster reading times when texts are presented in sans-serif fonts, although the opposite is stated in parts of the literature. The present work examines if the presence or absence of serifs also have an impact on the appraisal of scientific texts when all other important font characteristics do not change. For this purpose, 188 university students participated in an online experiment and rated different aspects of scientific abstracts as well as of the research outlined in the abstracts. The results show that missing serifs led to increased reading speed. However, and in contrast to the perceptual fluency hypothesis, the presence of serifs had a positive effect on all evaluation dimensions. The results of a second study with 187 participants also indicated that reading fluency counteracted the liking of texts. Implications for future studies and media production are discussed.
基于文本的交流是传播科学信息的重要方式之一。虽然书面文字的内容和语境方面已经得到了广泛研究,但字体特征对文本感知的影响几乎还是一片空白。以下研究探讨了衬线对在线呈现的科学摘要评价的影响。然而,尽管部分文献有相反表述,但只有证据表明无衬线字体呈现文本时阅读速度更快。本研究考察在所有其他重要字体特征不变的情况下,衬线的有无是否也会对科学文本的评价产生影响。为此,188名大学生参与了一项在线实验,对科学摘要以及摘要中概述的研究的不同方面进行评分。结果表明,没有衬线会提高阅读速度。然而,与感知流畅性假设相反,衬线的存在对所有评价维度都有积极影响。另一项有187名参与者的研究结果也表明,阅读流畅性会抵消对文本的喜爱。文中还讨论了对未来研究和媒体制作的启示。